US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
Do we have a source for origin of the image of the shooter? Was it Twitter or 4chan or reddit or Tumblr? I do not understand how, with
the info that was available at the time, he was identified or that picture was found.

1000021433.jpg

I believe this was a glowie op. We know the deep state exists, we know they have assassinated presidents before, have destroyed presidents before, and have been actively working against Donald Trump.

1000021429.jpg

Why was the shooter able to post himself in an elevated position 130 yards away with clear line of sight without consequence? Catastrophic incompetence? I genuinely doubt it, but it is possible.

The USSS seem to have been alerted to a shooter on the roof minutes before and did not respond. Again, is this just incompetence or is it something more sinister?

If this was orchestrated, how many USSS agents were involved? Was the sniper on the roof actually looking directly at the shooter waiting to take a shot only after Trump was killed? I can't tell. He was being filmed from a long way away on a phone camera and the perspective may be off.



He pops his head up and readjusts right before the shooter gets his first shot off and fires back immediately.

After the attempted assassination, throughout the Cathedral, social media and news orgs, they started to question the reality of the situation, starting with President Obama himself:

1000021431.jpg

Was this a contingency plan if the assassination failed? To muddy the waters, to start the "it was staged" theory amongst the more retarded of their base? If Trump had died (inches away from happening, Jesus Christ...), Obama would not have written that. Obama is a smart man and is very careful about what he says and there is no doubt that the motivation here was to sow suspicion.

So back to the image of the shooter which appears to show him the day of the rally on site, before his name was released. I suspect this shooter will not be the deranged leftist, antifa troon we all would imagine a lone wolf shooter to be.

He will be a "registered republican". He will be a big 2A guy. He was wearing a Demolition Ranch shirt lmao.

Big tech had their orders to scrub his Internet presence before the name was released. His entire persona can now be manufactured whole cloth. I wonder what type of person they will create?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Bindo, scrub, Lady Round Buns and 22 others
Ralph Barnhardt said:
200 pages have been added since this whole thing started so forgive me if this has already been broached. I saw that the shooter had registered as a republican in '21, which would've been the earliest he would've been able to vote, and has only voted in '22 midterms. I remember that there was a push, albeit a small one, to have, I don't know what to call them, sleeper agents I guess, register as republicans in an attempt to screw with elections. I don't know if that's the case here. I doubt it but it might be a possibility.
Click to expand...
In the context of him donating to the extreme lefty ballot-stuffing "get-out-the-vote" org Actblue, and just generally looking like a tranny, I'd say that there's a very strong possibility that participation in that whole Nikki Haley gayop was the reason he registered as a Republican.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Bindo, Netizennameless, spiritofamermaid and 10 others
Ralph Barnhardt said:
The weirdest thing to me is that at about 8 seconds in the sniper takes his eye away from the scope and looks like he's doing a double take before the first shot rings out and the he scrunches down. I can tell if he takes a shot at that point or tries to hide. I'm leaning towards him hiding as, one, the other guy behind him does the same and, two, all the shots that follow sound the same.

I've rewatched this one clip for a few minutes now and now I'm not sure. It looks like he's the one who takes the first shot. His head goes up, he recognizes the threat but because he took his eye away from the scope he has to reset himself. It might be artifacting from the cell camera but it looks like there's muzzle flash. He does bounce back right as the first shot rings out like it's from the recoil.

But now that I think about it, that doesn't make sense because the first shot hit Trump or hit the glass that hit trump if that's what happened. There are three shots at Trump followed by a brief pause followed by what I assume is returned fire.

I don't know. I think shenanigans are afoot but I don't know exactly who, where, or why. I'm just trying to puzzle it out.
Click to expand...
Same thing me and my buddy were evaluating. It was almost cartoonish.

That counter-sniper is out of a job.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, spiritofamermaid, AStupidMonkey and 4 others
Lots and lots of questions.

So either this was a deep state op or a lone wolf attack by an ANTIFA retard.

The DEI SS security detachment either was so fucking incompetent to not have all the roofs in the general area watched (very possible because well..DEI hires, only half joking)

or they were aware of a possible attack and left a big giant hole in their security perimeter and then pointed a sniper directly at it so when the potential assassin attacked, they could kill him quickly with the goal of letting Trump get killed and then silencing his assassin.

Either way Trump may be better off bolstering his security with private citizens who believe in his cause and not mostly relying on the SS. I understand that he has private security hired but the SS still makes up most of his team.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Higgs Bonbon and invisibult plus+
Pepito The Cat said:
There were like 20 cameramen down there and you really underestimate their skills to take epic shots. I work with guys like those all the time and let me assure you, they would do a better job at braining someone 200 yards away than the power-mullet kid that actually tried to kill Trump.
Click to expand...
Not to mention, everything was focused on the stage and the flag was behind it. You don’t even have to try taking that shot. It will just happen normaly.

There is no need for camera wizardry in any of this.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Pepito The Cat, ATI Escapee and 2 others
Ghostse said:
Its 100% easy and clear:
You are government bureaucrat sitting in the air-conditioned party van trailer. You have gotten important enough to sit in the big boy chair during a political rally. You have a report from a sniper of a man with a gun getting into position on the roof. You have plainsclothes agents already moving in verify and deal with the threat. You also have no reports of dangerous political idealogues at the rally.

Do you:
A) approve the sniper to fire, which will not only result in the person being killed but also triggering the close-in protective detail to protectively tackle the candidate on stage and get them to the safe zone, ending the rally in a newscycle worthy event to which you will be very attached. Bear in mind the sniper may not be able to positively ID the person as having a weapon due to angle/distance.

B) Have the sniper hold fire so the person can be intercepted by the plainsclothes agents in a much more low key, the rally continues uninterrupted, and you don't have to wonder if the sniper mis-Identified a camera or toy as a gun.

Again, there is plenty of space for reasonable tinfoilery, but its also very understandable why the sniper would have held fire until he was 100% certain it was an active shooter. And its also easy to see how bad call at the top didn't have the guy preemptively ventilated, and why the person making that bad call wouldn't have thought it was a bad call at the time.
Click to expand...
Wrong, wrong and wrong.

First of all, that rooftop should have been occupied by security personnel. No way do you EVER leave a rooftop that has line of site to the President open and unguarded. It’s unthinkable.

Then, as a sniper, you’re trained to take out threats post haste so that an assassin does NOT get a shot off. Security of the President takes precedence above all else.

Finally, security detail snipers have superior scopes and they sometimes also have spotters. They could see the assassin’s weapon crystal clear.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Bindo, Fatsuit Shinji, Vernon Dozier and 15 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back