US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Yeah the hobo eating his own shit under the bridge is actually a fortune telling wizard.
the hobo eating his own shit under the bridge cannot effectively function as a fortune telling wizard because of his lack of ability to articulate, but he can spout words that end up being legitimately clairvoyant in nature, even if they're unclear and cryptic
 
Yeah, but he was funny and likeable, he seemed down to Earth and I had hoped he would be above this "KILL ALL REPUBLICUCKS" bullshit. I'm severely disappointed in him in particular.
He's always been crude and nasty. His only really good movie was School of Rock and that was because he had to tone it down because of all the kids.
 
View attachment 6204544
Yeah, ok, so here's my hot take based on my spiritual studies.

Precognition is *definitely* real, clairvoyance is *definitely* real, but it's often very muddied. Schizos are human beings whose nervous systems are altered in such a way that their 'antennas' pick up things that normal people do not, and some of those things include future events.

I don't believe everything that happens is set in stone, but there are some events that are basically predestined to happen. Quite possible that Thomas Crooks shooting at Trump and grazing Trump's right ear was an event that was "supposed" to happen, in a metaphysical sense as 'scripted' by higher powers as opposed to more mundane sense concocted by human players.

So, a Dutch schizo's nervous system picked up on that part of the 'prophecy,' but processed in a very vague way, and posted it in an incomplete vague way to 4chan. Yes, this sounds like something straight out of fantasy, like a Moth Priest reading an Elder Scrolls, but if you look up precognition, clairvoyance, telepathy, kundalini experiences, the effects of extensive meditative and brahmacharya (e.g. semen retention, fasting) practices, you'll know that this stuff is definitely legit but hard to directly control.

Schizos don't really control what they pick up on, but they do occasionally pick up on future events and relay it in cryptic ways. In many cases, they don't understand what they pick up on, and may have received the 'messages' in a very symbolic fashion as opposed to a literal fashion (e.g. the Dutch schizo may have received symbolic visuals pertaining to a 'Thomas' being claimed to have 'been alone' and a symbolic visual of a right ear being struck by an object)

I hate to bring up that HBO show, but Helaena Targaryen from House of the Dragon is an example. But it's really not confined to fiction. Not, one, bit.
There's a popular theory of people who are Alex Jones or deeper that says the Deep State/Illuminati/etc must always signal what they're going to do in a way that is visible to the public, but that the public will not understand. Allegedly they believe that this grants them more magical power. Thus, you will see a bunch of various references to events in media and other things before it happens, or you see people cryptically warning or confessing to things in retrospect.

I say this, because the theory I just said, no matter how unlikely this may be, is about 500x more likely than that schizophrenics are prophetic and just a little confused.
 
There's a popular theory of people who are Alex Jones or deeper that says the Deep State/Illuminati/etc must always signal what they're going to do in a way that is visible to the public, but that the public will not understand. Allegedly they believe that this grants them more magical power. Thus, you will see a bunch of various references to events in media and other things before it happens, or you see people cryptically warning or confessing to things in retrospect.
That theory goes they have to telegraph what they're doing as an advanced warning to prevent karma from undoing the success of their plan.
 
There's a popular theory of people who are Alex Jones or deeper that says the Deep State/Illuminati/etc must always signal what they're going to do in a way that is visible to the public, but that the public will not understand. Allegedly they believe that this grants them more magical power. Thus, you will see a bunch of various references to events in media and other things before it happens, or you see people cryptically warning or confessing to things in retrospect.

I say this, because the theory I just said, no matter how unlikely this may be, is about 500x more likely than that schizophrenics are prophetic and just a little confused
Isn't that like some sort of perspective reality, where reality is the way it is because we believe it's the way it is?

I would be really, really pissed if reality worked that way.
 
>I would be really, really pissed if reality worked that way.

@Betonhaus Dude I've been saying that Chris Chan escaped conviction and got an IRL girlfriend because of applying this aspect of reality. But this forum is by and large not ready to accept that Law of Attraction, "you can manifest your own reality" shit that the TikTok girls blab about...is actually legit!
 
>I would be really, really pissed if reality worked that way.

@Betonhaus Dude I've been saying that Chris Chan escaped conviction and got an IRL girlfriend because of applying this aspect of reality. But this forum is by and large not ready to accept that Law of Attraction, "you can manifest your own reality" shit that the TikTok girls blab about...is actually legit!
no wonder you have a pink triangle
 
Now of course once Trump is actually elected they can go back to their more comfortable spot of being the "under ground" the "rebellion".
It annoys the fuck out of me when they claim to be “the resistance.” Their positions and narratives are embraced and enforced in lockstep by the mainstream media, Hollywood, corporations, tech industry, school boards, and a sizable majority of the political class.

Yet, they have the gall to call themselves “the resistance” and bitch endlessly that their viewpoints are of the minority, and that the right is more institutionally powerful than they are? Especially amidst the wholesale demonizing of anything to the slightest right of their beliefs? PLEASE.

They have no fucking idea what resistance truly is.


It's no doubt now that Vance will take Harris to the cleaners in a debate. I doubt we will see one but who knows. VP debates don't mean jack shit mostly so they may just say fuck it and roll the dice.
She's going to try some "I am that girl" bullshit with him and it's going to come across as fake and ridiculous.
Remember when she debated Pence in 2020? How she smirked through the whole thing?
IMG_2010.jpeg

I hope she tries that with Vance, and he looks right at her and drops Pesci’s line when he was at the blackjack table in Casino (1995).
IMG_2011.gif
 
>I would be really, really pissed if reality worked that way.

@Betonhaus Dude I've been saying that Chris Chan escaped conviction and got an IRL girlfriend because of applying this aspect of reality. But this forum is by and large not ready to accept that Law of Attraction, "you can manifest your own reality" shit that the TikTok girls blab about...is actually legit!
By your own reasoning, the effect only works collectively. You need a lot of buy-in to make your reality.
 
There's a popular theory of people who are Alex Jones or deeper that says the Deep State/Illuminati/etc must always signal what they're going to do in a way that is visible to the public, but that the public will not understand. Allegedly they believe that this grants them more magical power. Thus, you will see a bunch of various references to events in media and other things before it happens, or you see people cryptically warning or confessing to things in retrospect.

It could just be that they get a kick out of dropping hints early. Like that streamer who murdered his girlfriend while pretending to livestream. He dropped hints in the prerecorded "livestream".
 
It could just be that they get a kick out of dropping hints early. Like that streamer who murdered his girlfriend while pretending to livestream. He dropped hints in the prerecorded "livestream".
That's more realistic. Psychopaths get a thrill out of dropping hints and seeing that no one catches them in time.
 
@Allanon a tripfag on 4chan is likely to not be a Deep Stater or freemason or whatever; this isn't like some random guest on a mainstream media talk show, dropping vague hints at something that is later tied to an actual event
You misunderstand me. I'm saying the chances of it being a Deep Stater are higher than it being a schizo who is just messed up in the head to be prophetic. That is not me saying there is a chance that it is the Deep State.
That theory goes they have to telegraph what they're doing as an advanced warning to prevent karma from undoing the success of their plan.
Right, yeah. Depending on who talks about it, it's either a karma dodging thing or it's some satanic ritual that increases their power. It's pretty pervasive though.
Isn't that like some sort of perspective reality, where reality is the way it is because we believe it's the way it is?

I would be really, really pissed if reality worked that way.
It doesn't matter if reality works that way or not. It only matters if the people doing it think it does. Whether they do or not remains to be seen - there's no hard evidence and obviously no whistleblowers about it, but whether this is how reality works or not is only a distant second behind whether the people orchestrating conspiracies believe it does.

It could just be that they get a kick out of dropping hints early. Like that streamer who murdered his girlfriend while pretending to livestream. He dropped hints in the prerecorded "livestream".

This is frankly the most likely answer. Any time this genuinely happens and isn't just coincidence or pareidolia it's entirely likely that the sociopaths orchestrating mass murder just want to gloat, moreso than they're trying to do some kind of ceremony.
 
Screenshot (819).png
twitter is a great source of schizo posting ever since the shooting. don't get me wrong i'm 100% sure something was up here with the SS, but we're at the point were apparently everyone in attendance was part of the conspiracy.

like this guy is convinced the photographer was in on it because he used a specific camera speed. which beyond the fact that it would be stupid for the glowies to tell a bunch of jurnos about the biggest conspiracy arguably sense JFK, if he knew what was about to happen why would he use a setting designed to catch an image of a bullet if he thought he was taking a photo of an assassination not a near assassination? did jimmy olsen want the shoot actual gore porn? now that i think about it with how much they hate him that would be on brand for jurnos...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back