@Enig Well, uh, don't take the Possible Girls paper too seriously, the procedure the author outlines won't work (duh) and even in the crazy David Lewis logic it's broken.
David Lewis is a bad logician, but that does not matter here. Not exactly related, but Subjunctive Reciprocity, look it up. This is related to the choice theory of the "girl" (paper term) in question in the face of optimality, see my previous posts in this thread.
To solve this problem there would be required the development of the field of "counterlogical love", and a much more complex procedure would be needed than used in the paper. I reject the idea of multiple instances of the same "possible world" (Lewis term) for mathematical reasons, but this is good because it restores near-guaranteed mutual monogamy with your
imaginary possible girlfriend. I also reject Impossible Girls, because they are not possible.
To be clear, they have to be called girls because the original David Lewis paper is called Possible Worlds, they are not literally girls. On the subject of Impossible Girls, on my understanding of Max Tegmark's multiverse theory, they are ruled out by the internal consistency requirements of mathematics. Max Tegmark's theory probably does not rule out non-computable or uncomputable girls, but I don't know how desirable they would be anyway so I'm leaving them out here. Maybe ask Penrose about them.
Not to be confused with un-computing your girlfriend, something can can only be done on certain types of quantum girls. So, to summarize, I'm talking about computable, 100% Dost compliant, logically possible (but not existing in actuality) "Girls".
I have not read Unsong (Scott Alexander (alias), paperback, 2024), but I have been advised that Neil Armstrong (astronaut) lands on the celestial sphere and sings the praises of God forever (or maybe not, as I said I have not read the book). This reminds me, for no particular reason, of the character Luna from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic (MLP:FIM). Maybe this character can go back to the moon and sing your praises forever, along with the delta encoding
(delta3 encoding? Again for no reason.) between your universe and hers, ordered by stable Z-order space filling curves, encoded into base16 and performed spoken word using the NATO phonetic alphabet. This is good to an extent because Luna is portrayed as an adult, but see the "talking donkey" section of the Possible Girls paper.
Rainbow Dash is not a viable candidate, due to the limited lifespan of such possible creatures. Depending on how the mathematical multiverse works, Luna would have to spend at least hundreds of trillions of years continuously performing, if not much longer or forever.
@Peppermint Swirl would this be a viable replacement for Rainbow Dash? I don't see how your choice could possibly work out, even in the theories of Tegmark and Lewis.
@Lunarfag do you have a preexisting claim?
PS don't talk about "jelqing", I don't know what it is but I know I don't want to hear about it.