"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Null will spend half an hour relishing in the pain of those like Hickock because they didn't see the looming tornado and didn't invest time in alternative platforms, yet he won't spend five minutes setting up the Monero superchat alternative, even though he has been financially deplatformed in the past and most likely will be again in the future.

Really makes you think.
There are two people asking for this, tops. No American institution even sells Monero anymore. Give it up.
1677968566917160.jpg
Seriously Josh when are going to set up taking my Shiny rocks.
 
Kraken.com sells Monero and it's one of the biggest and oldest exchange. It's an American financial institution.
Websites like ChangeNow.io also sell XMR directly with a credit card payment without needing you to have an account. They're also a US company.
Hell you could setup a ChangeNow.io integration (like Monero.com does) to have people pay with a credit card on the website/KF's donation page and have your address as the recipient of the Monero. So easy even women can do it, and you know that the current amount of friction necessary to send money to KF is too much for most women on this website to go through.

View attachment 6211326View attachment 6211330

I know that you're not deep into the crypto space anymore, but you underestimate the amount of Monero circulating all the time because of people buying drugs. There's a lot of demand for easy XMR access, druggies don't like complexity.
Now the real question is which crypto casinos accept monero :lossmanjack:
 
And this is it cleaned up a little.
How do you say like, "I'm going to join the Mud People Racist Division. We're going to have a proud mud people ethnostate."
Hell yeah. Bring on the Mud People Ethnostate. :gunt:
And the people who maintain that apparatus are intelligent, selected to be intelligent deliberately, and modified to be more intelligent deliberately, and they are accessed by an artificial intelligence system that also currently exists in China. You see it used in governments already that help a small group of people who are already much more clever than the people they rule over, and that small group of people is then enabled to make sweeping decisions easily, effortlessly, with the assistance of machine learning. That's my conspiracy.
tbh if a group of people are smart enough to do all that then they kinda deserve to rule over their lessers huh?
 
Someone negrate me or whatever if I'm wrong or if someone explained this during the superchats (I didn't get to finish the stream yet), but I'm pretty sure Null (and the majority of the media) got the Crowdstrike story wrong.

Crowdstrike is basically just advanced antivirus. It does more invasive stuff than antivirus normally does by essentially rootkiting the computer it's installed on. It's better than other antivirus (supposedly) because it doesn't just use signatures for known viruses, it watches all the processes on the machine for malicious behavior. For example, you can write a bespoke crypto virus and replace cmd.exe with it on a machine protected by crowdstrike, and when it runs it'll still catch it when it sees cmd.exe try to encrypt all your files. Most antiviruses aren't going to stop cmd.exe, and most antiviruses need to have a copy of the virus to be able to detect it, crowdstrike doesn't. Supposedly it uses AI or something.

Crowdstrike does not replace or suppliment any update mechanisms on the machine, or if it does it's a secondary function. The fuck up with crowdstrike was a bad crowdstrike update, not a bad OS update pushed by crowdstrike. For most software, the worst it could do is fuck up the software, but since crowdstrike needs kernel level access to do all the stuff it does, the update broke Windows.

Crowdstrike is also available for Linux to protect servers in basically the same way, and they had a very similar fuckup with Linux not that long ago. It's just significantly less popular on Linux than on Windows because Linux doesn't really require an antivirus the way that Windows does. The vast majority of Linux installs are servers limited to an SSH port and a port for whatever service they're running, and mostly exist in isolated, firewalled networks in a datacenter/cloud with no other local devices, whereas Windows runs on most peoples desktops, most buisnesses' AD servers (which need to be accessible to all the desktops in the company), POS devices connected to the same network as all the desktops, etc., therefore the vast majority of Windows machines (including servers) need an antivirus whereas the vast majority of Linux boxes don't.

Most of the media is calling this a Microsoft problem, but it's really not. It's just a Crowdstrike problem that happens to only affect Microsoft machines this time.

Also, Crowdstrike glows very bright. They're the company the DNC hired to blame the leaks on Russia with no evidence. I doubt that's relevant to what happened with the botched update, but it's worth mentioning.
 
Last edited:
tbh if a group of people are smart enough to do all that then they kinda deserve to rule over their lessers huh?
The concept of "Deserve" in the concept of power politics is defeatist and libtarded. There is no reason to assign yourself as one of the "lessers" when any of the tools and institutions used by these people to get into power are available to any group motivated enough. It's not simple since you need to dedicate most of your life to it and keep the people you're working with organized towards the goal, but it's possible. The critical factor is to remove any populist or revolutionary notion from your mind, look at the world as different factions of elites working with or against each other, and work towards joining or corrupting the one most accessible and moving upward.

Jews and Indians and Chinese and any faction of Whites did not gain power over any territory because they "deserved" it, they gained control over smaller institutions, grew them further, and put their own in charge of those. With the resources from this they gained further power of bigger institutions and did the same. All methods of gaining power in modern civilization is essentially this at larger or smaller scale. The cartels do this in south america by taking over trafficking businesses. The Taliban did this by taking over administration of Afghanistan and becoming the true local ruling power over large areas of the country even before the Americans left.
 
Last edited:
The concept of "Deserve" in the concept of power politics is defeatist and libtarded. There is no reason to assign yourself as one of the "lessers" when any of the tools and institutions used by these people to get into power are available to any group motivated enough. It's not simple since you need to dedicate most of your life to it and keep the people you're working with organized towards the goal, but it's possible. The critical factor is to remove any populist or revolutionary notion from your mind, look at the world as different factions of elites working with or against each other, and work towards joining or corrupting the one most accessible and moving upward.

Jews and Indians and Chinese and any faction of Whites did not gain power over any territory because they "deserved" it, they gained control over smaller institutions, grew them further, and put their own in charge of those. With the resources from this they gained further power of bigger institutions and did the same.
You probably aren't going to convince him. We are in a religious war. And if he believes what he does he probably is a technocrat.
 
@Null a SNICKERDOODLE is a buttery cookie with cinnamon and sugar. They are fucking delicious. You are likely thinking of GOLDENDOODLES, or other doodle "breeds" which are established dog breeds crossbred with poodles.

746A3749-683x1024.jpeg

Now I say "breed" in quotation marks because they aren't recognized breeds, but hybrids. The goldendoodle is the most well known of these hybrids, and are a cross between a golden retriever and a poodle. There are, however, countless other poodle hybrids with oodle or doodle in the name. The whole thing is really VERY gay. On thing you will notice when you return to the US is that these doodle dogs are FUCKING EVERYWHERE. When these hybrids were first created there was a real reason for them to exist. That reason was to create service dogs for people who were normally allergic to dogs. The solution was to introduce the genetics of the incredibly intelligent, beautiful, and low shedding poodles with other breeds typically used as service animals. They were largely very successful for their intended purpose but there was one side effect of this crossbreeding that no one really consider before doing it. That was that these dogs are FUCKING ADORABLE. They look like fucking teddy bears. This ignited a doodle craze that has really peaked in the last few years. Everybody on EARTH wants one of these fucking dogs. This created a huge rush of backyard breeders breeding the fuck out of these doodle dogs using dogs with poor genetics and temperments. Breeding dogs should be done with the health and wellbeing of the dogs as the first and foremost concern. Unfortunately, a lot of people have been breeding them and selling them like fashion accessories. The pendulum has been swinging the other way on them though, and has created a very outspoken group of dedicated doodle haters. It's sad, as they aren't bad dogs, but being extremely intelligent and energetic working dog hybrids with very high demand for proper coat care (grooming them takes a lot of time and effort) a lot of people who get them don't have the capacity to care for or stimulate them properly, so a lot of them end up with behavioral issues. I have a goldendoodle and she is my little golden angel baby, but she takes a lot of time and energy to keep happy and healthy. She's worth it though.
 
You probably aren't going to convince him. We are in a religious war. And if he believes what he does he probably is a technocrat.
To be honest, I am a technocrat too. What I've explained there is essentially a technocrat's analysis. I don't think anyone who matters is motivated by religious faith, and it's a mistake to work on that assumption because you trick yourself into thinking that there is metaphysical or philosophical consistency in your enemy's beliefs. Looking at what a respective faction maintains control of, who they're dependent on to maintain control, how they maintain control, et cetera, I think it's best to analyze and act in those terms rather than attempting to understand the true nature of people.
 
you should stream with josh and explain to him your obsession with ponies in great detail. I think everyone would be interested in hearing that
That'll be the day lmao. It would harken back to the good old days when Jim would invite weirdos on his podcast.
 
Back