Opinion "The Boys" gives us a grim warning of Trumpism's endgame

Link (Archive)

"The Boys" gives us a grim warning of Trumpism's endgame​

In 2018, I had a short conversation with a well-known TV journalist that I’ll never forget about “The Handmaid’s Tale.” This person had asked me about a commentary I wrote about its harrowing second season and weighed in with a contrary view that went along the lines of, “Actually, it makes me feel optimistic.” Baffled by that interpretation, I asked why.

“Because that will never happen here,” they said.

There is no way this person could have known Roe v. Wade would be overturned four years later. Scratch that — maybe they could have, if they noticed the steady erosion of reproductive freedoms already in motion.

I share this anecdote to illustrate the pitfalls of cloaking real-world crises in elaborate settings, costumes and dystopian oddity. Don't take that the wrong way; these descriptors apply to some of my favorite stories.

But the proliferation of such unrealities allows many to accept “The Handmaid’s Tale” at face value, drawing relief from its alternate reality designation. Who would ever think that the right to work, read or exist apart from men would be stripped from women? Or that a woman's reproductive rights would be controlled by the state? Or that we'd ever find ourselves where we are now?

Genre fiction traffics in extremes that make certain scenarios seem impossible. But nearly all such work is influenced by events that have already happened or are happening someplace on Earth. Just not here. Never here. And that is how people who should know better, like my colleague, can confidently dismiss concerns that these doom-filled stories might actualize as baseless.

My memory of that conversation turned over in my head as I rewatched the fourth season finale of “The Boys.” The Prime Video series made headlines on Thursday when the episode went live with a new “Viewer Discretion Advised” title card that also reads, “This episode contains scenes of fictional political violence. Any similarities to recent events are completely coincidental and fictional. Prime Video, MGM Studios, Sony Pictures Television and the producers of The Boys oppose, in the strongest terms, real-world violence of any kind.”

The finale, which was filmed in 2023, was originally titled “Assassination Run.” In light of the July 13 assassination attempt on Trump at a Pennsylvania rally, it is now simply called “Season Four Finale.”

I’ve already written about the fourth season’s uncanny prescience and brazen anti-Trumpism for which the series’ creator Eric Kripke does not apologize. “I clearly have a perspective, and I’m not shy about putting that perspective in the show,” he told The Hollywood Reporter in June. “Anyone who wants to call the show ‘woke’ or whatever, that’s OK. Go watch something else. But I’m certainly not going to pull any punches or apologize for what we’re doing.”

Kripke declined to talk about the finale with Salon, and a request to Prime Video for an interview with the episode’s writers Jessica Chou and David Reed went unanswered.

The finale’s title is not worth discussing in depth beyond the unsettling coincidence in its timing. Other movies and TV shows have had to postpone their debuts or rename episodes in light of violent tragedies, most of them related to school shootings.

“The Boys,” however, is an outsized apologue of the worst-case ending that is the product of outsized political rhetoric, years and years of it, that demonizes anyone that doesn’t agree with you.

Kripke, Chou and Reed are simply expanding what they already knew about our partisan atmosphere in 2023 to its darkest end. What I wanted to ask them is whether they consulted Project 2025 as they were writing these scripts. It's not as if they needed to, since most of what these superhuman overlords say and do are slight variations of what Donald Trump promises at his rallies, along with Fox News pundits' talking points.

Homelander and his Congressional allies also have a vast propaganda machine devoted to portraying them as heroes, or at worst wrathful (but just!) gods and their critics into demons. Topping that list is Starlight (Erin Moriarty), a former member of Homelander's team who defects to become the face of progressive dissent. Firecracker paints her as a "baby-killer" and a pedophile to her Vought News viewers, inviting them to hunt her supporters, called Starlighters.

The nation’s wealthy conspire with them to build and operate internment camps into which any dissenters opposing their oligarchy can disappear.

“Season Four Finale” shows the culmination of those plans, dropping in on the show’s version of Jan. 6. The House speaker moves to certify the election results making President-elect Robert Singer (Jim Beaver) the new Commander-in-Chief with Victoria Neuman (Claudia Doumit) as his Vice President. Elsewhere the show’s non-powered vigilante heroes are moving quickly to take out Neuman since they and Singer know she’s actually a Supe.

They’re also aware she’s working with the show’s Trump stand-in Homelander (Antony Starr) to invoke the 25th Amendment, placing her in power and giving Homelander a green light to hunt his "enemies," starting with Singer.

But the top hero isn’t content to let events occur as planned and outs Neuman as “super-abled” on national television, sparking riots across the country. While this is happening, a shapeshifter assassin pretending to be Starlight tries to kill Singer in his bunker.

The chameleon nearly succeeds before the actual Starlight emerges from her imprisonment and dispatches her impersonator. But it’s all for nothing since they record Singer talking about his plan to take out Neuman.

That clip leaks to the press right after The Boys’ ousted leader Billy Butcher (Karl Urban) murders Neuman, setting in motion Homelander’s master plan. Singer is arrested, the Speaker of the House is named president and by executive order declares martial law, naming Homelander the country’s top cop.

His first act is to hunt anyone who threatens his reputation, or that he just doesn’t like. He and the three remaining members of his squad The Seven begin his purge by murdering half of his company's employees.

Before she’s killed Neuman warns him that for his plan to work, he must take out half the country, a task easily handled once he deputizes everyone with powers. A handful make quick work of The Boys, who are swiftly renditioned despite their best efforts to disappear before everything goes sideways on a global scale.

This happens as the backdrop to Vought Network talking head and Christian fascist Firecracker (Valorie Curry) theatrically celebrating this violent regime change with her 2024 version of “It’s Morning in America”:

“We wake up to a new world where hope, purity, and Jesus’ love shine down on us all,” she says, “. . . Where America finally sees the woke mob for what it is: monsters who want to destroy our heritage, traffic our children and feminize our men. Where, with Homelander’s guidance, we will come together in unity.”

There’s it is again, the recurring buzzword at last week’s Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. Of course, as Salon's senior politics writer Amanda Marcotte observed after interviewing convention attendees, Trump's followers interpret "unity" in all kinds of ways while denouncing Democrats for reminding the public of Trump's statement that he would be a dictator "on day one," and citing his followers' readiness to embrace fascism and violence.

Supporters like Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts, who declared on Real America's Voice network that "we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be."

It may have been easier in the past to simply view “The Boys” as nihilistic escapism or somehow comfort ourselves by pointing to its impossible components as evidence that our society would never fall that far. This is despite many people citing our culture’s love affair with superheroes as a symptom of our willingness to associate wealth and celebrity with suitability for leadership.

The “if/then” game of speculative writing is devoted to reshaping the possible into situations the reader or viewer can assure themselves aren’t real and never could be. But these latest chapters of “The Boys” contain too many correlations to current events to not view it as a warning.

Even so, this fourth season of “The Boys,” its penultimate, promotes the belief that most people harbor good intentions while understanding that is not enough to save us.

This is the conclusion its everyman hero Hughie (Jack Quaid) lands on when their chances of survival have diminished to nothing. “If we’re ever going to win against monsters,” he says, “I think we need to start acting human.”

That only works if those aligned against you don't get off on inhumanity. Our last view of Hughie shows him being stuffed into a windowless truck by people in black uniforms. He signals to his fiancée Starlight to fly away, not fight. With that, she flings herself into the endless unknown, throwing her lot in the rest of us.
 
There is no way this person could have known Roe v. Wade would be overturned four years later. Scratch that — maybe they could have, if they noticed the steady erosion of reproductive freedoms already in motion.
Oh no the federal government lost some power, how fucking terrible.
People cannot tell the difference between fiction and reality.

Some people can, at least most of the time. But there is a huge swath of the population whose opinions on real life issues can be swayed this way.
This bullshit didn't fly for Jack Thompson and his crusade against pixelated blood and it damn sure makes even less sense here. Get a fucking grip.
 
Is there anything redeemable about this show? My friend made me watch the first episode because he thinks seasons 1-3 are good and I thought it was mid but overall inoffensive.

The more i read about it the more insufferable it becomes. Is there like a moderately good story somewhere in there??? Should I continue to watch to see for myself?
It would be OK if it followed the comics without the mandatory goyslop injection. The premise is refreshing during a time where tons of entertainment mediums are seemingly related to Marvel/Disney or DC.

The show is just shock theater. Lots of crude gore and sex-adjacent shit. Toni Starr does a really great job portraying this version of Homelander. I said this in another thread and I’ll repeat it here. If the premise of the show intrigues you; an organization of zeroes trying to get rid of “heroes” who have become celebrities and have taken too many liberties, download the scans of the comics and give them a go. They’re pretty good.
 
There are literally no parallels between the circumstances that allowed the Sons of Jacob to take power and Trump's presidential campaign.

In any case anybody who considers the novel "alternative reality" doesn't know their history. Gliead is heavily influenced by the real-world Iranian Revolution, interpreted in the context of a future United States. It's the proverb "the road to hell is paved with good intentions" in its purest form, just like Iran itself.
It's funny how the people who talk so much about Media Literacy have basically retroactively decided that A Handmaid's Tale is actually about America literally and parallels [insert current Republican bad guy here], despite the obvious real world context it was written in.
 
It's funny how the people who talk so much about Media Literacy have basically retroactively decided that A Handmaid's Tale is actually about America literally and parallels [insert current Republican bad guy here], despite the obvious real world context it was written in.
I think the United States was chosen because it had similarities to Iran in its own part of the world - it's big, rich, powerful and it going down is shocking, something nobody would expect. This was also the era of the hypocritical televangelists and Moral Majority types who show up in it as well.

However, anyone who thinks that novel is remotely anti-Christian didn't read it right.
 
It's funny how the people who talk so much about Media Literacy have basically retroactively decided that A Handmaid's Tale is actually about America literally and parallels [insert current Republican bad guy here], despite the obvious real world context it was written in.
Media Literacy thread when? Please?
 
I’ve already written about the fourth season’s uncanny prescience and brazen anti-Trumpism for which the series’ creator Eric Kripke does not apologize. “I clearly have a perspective, and I’m not shy about putting that perspective in the show,” he told The Hollywood Reporter in June. “Anyone who wants to call the show ‘woke’ or whatever, that’s OK. Go watch something else. But I’m certainly not going to pull any punches or apologize for what we’re doing.”

wow, how Stunning and Brave to be a leftist anti-Trump partisan in Hollywood. guess what, MAGA morons... I got OPINIONS! the SAME opinions as everyone else in my cultural bubble! that's right, and if you don't like it... TAKE A HIKE!!!

There’s it is again, the recurring buzzword at last week’s Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. Of course, as Salon's senior politics writer Amanda Marcotte observed after interviewing convention attendees, Trump's followers interpret "unity" in all kinds of ways while denouncing Democrats for reminding the public of Trump's statement that he would be a dictator "on day one," and citing his followers' readiness to embrace fascism and violence.

the sheer lack of cognitive dissonance in this article is truly impressive. libs really don't understand why their massive, multi-level, all-hands-on-deck, almost decade-long hate campaign against Trump and everyone who has any level of political sympathy towards him might be viewed as divisive. they're just correctly "reminding" everyone what's self-evidently true. Trump is the divisive one because he lied and said our political system is corrupt. why are you booing me? I'm right.

not only that, the premise of the entire article is that fiction isn't real life, but it does reflect real life, which means that fiction can be used to predict real life because... well, the logic doesn't go that far. American culture is generally dominated by retards whose primary interaction with the real world is the consumption of media, which means they interpret events primarily through the lens of media they've consumed. as Handicapper General Glampers stated earlier:

People cannot tell the difference between fiction and reality.

Some people can, at least most of the time. But there is a huge swath of the population whose opinions on real life issues can be swayed this way.

this is because, in the human mind generally, and in the modern mind especially, media and information create a feedback loop in which one informs the other. reality informs the creation of media, and media informs the interpretation of reality. and the longer the feedback loop runs, the further it wanders from anything resembling a baseline, consensus reality. this is why everyone exists in these increasingly schizoid culture bubbles that intersect less and less with each other as their information loops continue to iterate. and as hypernormalization progresses, the force of the percussive shock necessary to break those loops increases with it. the last great loop reset was, arguably, COVID. before that, the 2016 election. before that, the 2008 election. before that, 9/11. but something is different now. an inflection point has been passed. the Trump assassination attempt should have been a loop reset, but it barely caused any turbulence at all. a critical number of bubbles have lost their intersection, and the ability for singular events to ripple across multiple cultural spheres has become severely handicapped. and at this - the new peak of our modern derangement crisis - now comes the sage Columnist, highly educated Thinker of Truths, to condescend to the lumpen, unwashed masses: "if you think about it dude this totally fictional show tells you a lot about what real life could be like actually." no self-awareness whatsoever. truly a fascinating creature.

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a retard drooling on another retard's face--forever.
 
The Boys is make believe, and most of make believe is written by leftoid faggots.
So, no, a stupid TV show written by retards is not an example of "Trumpism's Endgame".

I wish Trump was half the Hitler these people bleat about, just so that we can send them to the camps where they belong.
 
President-elect Robert Singer (Jim Beaver)
Isn't that Jim Beaver's character from Supernatural?
This bullshit didn't fly for Jack Thompson and his crusade against pixelated blood and it damn sure makes even less sense here. Get a fucking grip.
People (with above retarded iqs) don't confuse actions in stories for actions in reality - that was and is stupid bullshit. But they do confuse ideas and narratives in stories for reality all the time. If they didn't you couldn't ruin someone's week by making them binge Chernobyl or get them fired up by playing a song they associate with winning.
It's hilarious to witness how transparent, ham-fisted and hacky the propaganda has become lately. If you watch it as an exercise on how NPCs are programmed it can be informative/amusing.
I honestly find it incredibly depressing, because it's still fucking working. I had a guy - a smart guy who is generally switched on - tell me yesterday that he is now hopeful because the democrats have a smart eloquent prosecutor who will easily beat convicted felon Trump and his hateful rhetoric. What do you even say to someone that deep in denial?
 
Oh boy can't wait for another 8 years of TDS.
Just remember, TDS is not Trump's fault. Nobody has to sperg out so hard over the politicians they don't like that they become mentally ill. The Left will do this about whoever steps up after Trump, and they will pretend they never did it to Trump at all. Just like Dubya and McCain.
 
not only that, the premise of the entire article is that fiction isn't real life, but it does reflect real life, which means that fiction can be used to predict real life because... well, the logic doesn't go that far.
We had a similar article about the Acolyte posted here a couple of weeks ago. You know, in that heady time before someone tried to murder an American presidential candidate and the incumbent president dropped out of the race while not resigning.

It worked off the same logic, explaining that the show proved everyone needed to start listening to women because they are always right as demonstrated by this work of fiction. I think it's a sign that a lot of people have started spotting the manipulation within the fiction so the fallback is now to directly instruct them that they are being manipulated and this is how they are required to think after viewing it.

Pretty funny really. I suspect Beria and Goebbels are getting a real chuckle out of it in hell.
 
The Boys is make believe, and most of make believe is written by leftoid faggots.
So, no, a stupid TV show written by retards is not an example of "Trumpism's Endgame".

I wish Trump was half the Hitler these people bleat about, just so that we can send them to the camps where they belong.
Honestly these dipshits want a legit facist boot on their necks so bad it's teetering on the edge of fetishism.
 
Scary how many people out there treat the Real World as just a place to pick up tips on how to build a more realistic fever dream to mentally live in forevermore.....
 
Back