Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Cad an Hell]

Him trying to do a Bible stream while screeching at chat to stop judging him for going out with his mistress is incredible.

Eh.. he doesn't seem sober to me here?

 

[Angry Crustacean]

As his children are still going to the old church, it is possible Nick and Kayla would not be allowed to go as well since that would constitute unsupervised visitation. Anyone with experience with CPS who would like to affirm or deny this speculation would be greatly appreciated.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

- Nick invokes the Protestant idea of reading the bible to understand it and claims that whatever he personally reads in the bible as saying must be the truth.
- He then brags about his personal innovation which is bringing literary criticism techniques and deconstructionism to reading the bible.

Everything Nick asserts about his interpretation of the bible is completely self serving, especially the concept of grace, that god will excuse anything you do if you say a couple of hail Mary's afterwards. The more you lean on this crutch the less you mean it and Grace isn't about words but about the meaning behind those words. If what Nick says before god has no real meaning put into it then there is no Grace to be found for him.

I'm sure Nick could cleverly misinterpret the bible in a million different funny and weird ways that all culminate in that "Everything I ever do is proper and correct" and he's so prideful and arrogant that he'll do it every time. What Nick is doing with the bible has been done countless times before, he's not original, and it almost always ends up badly.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

he

Eh.. he doesn't seem sober to me here?

he definitely sounds like he's coking out. the constant hyper string of thoughts plus sounds like his mouth is trying to catch up with his brain.

 

[Sam Losco's Wife]

The more you lean on this crutch the less you mean it and Grace isn't about words but about the meaning behind those words.

If you don't believe Jesus Christ bore the sins of humanity, died and was risen again by the Father 3 days later there is no grace.

If you do not believe in the Son you fall short of the glory of God and you will be thrown into the Lake of Fire after the 2nd resurrection and white throne judgement. Grace is a free gift but it's on the condition you believe in His finished work.

The way junkie Rekieta butchers scripture it tells me he has not been sealed by the Holy Spirit which means he's not a believer, which means there is no grace offered.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Eh.. he doesn't seem sober to me here?

We really have never had a baseline to judge what a sober Nick looks like.

 

[Lemon-Lime Turpentine]

Add Smug Snaked Nick to anything

If Godzilla attacks Minnesota, don't worry. The Qoverfield Monster will be there to ward him off.

 

[Stupor Mario]

Everything Nick asserts about his interpretation of the bible is completely self serving, especially the concept of grace, that god will excuse anything you do if you say a couple of hail Mary's afterwards.

Yeah, Nick's ideas are more like the ye olde concept of papal indulgences from hundreds of years ago that became popular during Martin Luther's time where people thought their salvation had a pay-to-play exploit. You want to sin? No problem. Just buy an indulgence. No true repentance required.

- He then brags about his personal innovation which is bringing literary criticism techniques and deconstructionism to reading the bible.

Which is hilarious for him to think that considering biblical scholars have only been doing that for over a hundred years.

Far be it for me to question the erudite biblical scholarship of rogue pastor Nick, but:

- As others have pointed out, the parables of the lost coin, the lost lamb, and the prodigal son are about genuine repentance not some kind of bullshit endorsement of laissez-faire libertinism. The end of the parable of the prodigal son when the righteous son is indignant about the his father embracing his wayward brother is about people who are unforgiving of the genuinely repentant person who admits they went astray, but sincerely wants to clean up their act and then rejoin the fold.

- As others have mentioned, people in bible stories were polygamous, but that doesn't mean they were having threesomes or orgies. In the Book of Genesis, the patriarch Jacob is married to Leah and Rachel who are bitter rivals. In one story, one of Leah's sons finds some mandrakes. Rachel wants some and Leah agrees on the condition that she gets to sleep with Jacob that night. She wouldn't have needed to do that if the idea was that they were having threesomes.

- If Nick thinks everything was cool with David, he's either illiterate or mentally deficient. King David was punished severely for his adultery. The prophet Nathan told David that because of this the sword would never depart from his house, the Lord would raise up evil against him from within his own house, his wives would be taken from before his eyes and given to his neighbor and everyone would know this, and his son would die.

- Also, just in general, if you actually bother to read the bible, having multiple wives is not really depicted as being super awesome. Polygamy is often depicted as a constant source of strife and conflict. Just a total headache. King Solomon is said to have 700 wives and 300 concubines, and they are said to be the reason why Solomon became corrupted leading to his kingdom being split into two rival kingdoms.

 

[DuranceVile]

I feel compelled to go full Sunday School lesson here on a couple of Nick's points. Have a seat, class.

The Bible doesn't specifically say something is wrong at times, but rather shows the consequences of the action. For instance, Moses murders an Egyptian guard in a rage and has to flee Egypt. He was a prince and probably could've ordered the guy to stop mistreating the Israelite slaves, but it seems anger was a problem for Moses (see his ultimate failing in striking a rock for water rather than speaking to it, because he was mad, or him busting the original ten commandments). The Bible just shows that he had to flee Egypt and spend a long time in the wilderness after that. God took care of him and still used him to free Israel, as God works all things for good for those who love him and are called according to his purpose, but murdering a man in cold blood is no bueno.

Polygamy is a good example of that. Let's look at Nick talking about Abraham.

Abraham was originally known as Abram before God told him he'd make his descendants as plentiful as the stars in the sky or the sand on a beach. Abraham and his wife Sarah (originally named Sarai) were both advanced in years, and the idea of God turning them into a huge nation was pretty absurd. Sarah wasn't getting pregnant. So Abraham gets in his head that he'll help God out by marrying one of Sarah's servants named Hagar. Abraham and Hagar have as on named Ishmael.

Sarah immediately becomes very jealous of this arrangement and treats Hagar and Ishmael horribly. God intervenes, informs Abraham that he messed up royally, and says he needs to banish both of them. Abraham does. God does help Hagar live on her own and take care of Ishmael, but the damage is done. He declares that Ishmael will be at odds with his brothers for many generations. It's generally accepted that Ishmael's descendants are directly responsible for the creation of Islam and the many, many years of strife that has resulted from that.

Abraham's eventual son with Sarah was Isaac. Isaac only had one wife, Rebekah. But they had two boys, Esau and Jacob. Despite being younger, Jacob ended up being the one who carried on the family line. Fun fact about Esau, he's one of the few people in the Bible God directly says he wasn't a fan of (Malachi 1:3). Yikes. But anyway, Jacob steals Esau's birthright and blessing from Isaac through some shenanigans and has to run away for a long time. He ends up working for his mother's brother Laban. He falls in love with one of Laban's daughters, Rachel. Laban tells him he can marry her if he works for him for seven years. He does, has a wedding where he gets real liquored up. Wakes up in bed next to Rachel's older sister, Leah. Laban informs him that he kinda forgot to mention that the custom there is for the oldest daughter to be married off before the younger. He then offers Jacob another seven years of work in exchange for Rachel. Jacob, filled with the simp spirit, agrees. Seven years pass and he gets to marry Rachel.

The problem now is that Jacob treated Leah badly as he loved only Rachel. God takes pity on Leah and blesses her with children, while he keeps Rachel from having any. These are where the twelve tribes of Israel come from. Ten of which are Leah's children. The other two are Rachel's when God eventually allowed her to have children, Benjamin and Joseph. This is where things get murkier. Jacob treated Joseph and Benjamin a lot better than the children from Leah. This created further resentment, and ended in several of Joseph's children kidnapping Joseph and selling him into slavery. That's the whole Coat of Many Colors incident. God used that to save Israel, and quite a bit of the world, from a huge famine, but it was still all due to having multiple wives and preferential treatment.

Jumping ahead several centuries, we have Solomon who Nick also referenced. Solomon was the son of King David, 'a man after God's own heart' (Acts 13:22). David was a man who sought God in most everything, and when he screwed up - which he did, multiple times and bigly - he repented of his wickedness. Solomon was the king after David died. One of his first acts was to create a sacrifice to God so massive and impressive that God showed up to ask him what kind of blessing he'd like. Solomon asked humbly for the wisdom to lead his people. God was so impressed that he blessed Solomon with the most wisdom anyone in the world has ever had, and also with power and wealth. Israel thrived under Solomon's leadership.

But Solomon also decided to use his wisdom to try everything the world had to offer. Among the things he tried was having lots of marriages. He reportedly had about 1,000 wives and concubines together. His many wives all came from different cultures who worshipped different gods, so they led him astray. It was under Solomon's reign that the first cracks of faithful service to God began. Solomon became so disillusioned with his reckless pursuit of a hedonistic lifestyle, that the first part of Ecclesiastes, written by Solomon, is him lamenting the meaninglessness of life.

Fast forwarding to the New Testament, Paul wrote several things about marriage. For example, 1 Corinthians 7:2 and 1 Timothy 3:2. Both of those are pretty clear that man should 1: have a wife and 2: be faithful to her and her alone. I have a feeling Nick is of the (equally heretical) school of thought that the Apostle Paul's letters are just the writings of a man, and that they should be taken as such. It's often cited by people who dislike what he has to say, whether it be about sexual purity or women's role in the church. This is nonsense, as scripture is meant to be taken as the single divinely inspired word of God that tells the story of man's fall and redemption through Jesus Christ - and God's commandment to go and make believers of all the world.

tl;dr Nick's theology is dumb, a mess, and is easily picked apart by anyone who knows what they're talking about.

 

[Shig O'nella]

Why do all his interpretations sound so butthurt? He needs to find loopholes everywhere

I do keep asking if we're absolutely sure he's not a Jew, for that reason.

He's always trying to fucking rules-lawyer the Almighty.

 

[Makoto Niijima]

To be unburdened by what has been

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

Oh I love Nose’s interpretation of the Lost Son Parable. I already knew it but reread both the KJV and NIV, and here it is in a nutshell.

Spoiler

The son asks his father for his half of inheritance early, then fucks off on his own to a “distant country.” Consider what era this took place in, so communication between family was exceedingly difficult. The father more than likely had no idea what his son was doing during his absence. Then after squandering his wealth and being forced to resort to caring for pigs, he says “Oh dang! I’ve fumbled the bag and seriously fucked up! I was so wrong! I must ask my dad for forgiveness!”

Upon returning to his family he is welcomed by his father who, remember, likely has no idea
what did and did not transpire with the son during his absence. He can only infer what may have happened based on his appearance and repentant behavior. He probably learned more after talking to the Prodigal Son for a while afterward.

There was nothing “judgemental” about the father. The older brother is judgemental and
resentful, but he has a good reason for being that way. He didn’t squander his wealth or engage in any kind of debauchery and chose to remain at home with his family. Why wouldn’t he be upset that his shitass younger brother got a big “welcome home, it’s all good bro” party?

Honestly if anything, people that have “golden child” siblings and/or narc parents can probably relate to this older brother bigtime. Oldest siblings in general probably relate to him.

Consider that the Prodigal Son came to the conclusion he was wrong and “fumbled the bag” on his own and where his life of debauchery took him in the end. Nick is retarded so he didn't or chose to ignore it.

I'm not sure I would take the interpretation of the father's ignorance of what the prodigal son did as the correct one. The point as I understand it is that the Father is standing in for God and is meant to teach that God has mercy even for the biggest scumbags as long as they truly repent and change their heart. The loyal son is likely the Pharisees, who that chapter is addressing, those who had kept the law and would try to jealously keep those rewards (which are only God's to render).

The whole point is that God seeks repentance and conversion of heart. This is a repeated message throughout the entire Bible. Nick is, however, only looking for ways to use Jesus as a free "hoes and blow" pass.

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 6218767
LFG bible chads!!!!! I wonder what known sinner, heretic and retard Nick Rekieta has to say about a chapter he skimmed using SparkNotes.

This fucking faggot cokehead degenerate even mentioning the Bible might as well be spitting in the face of Christ. Kill yourself, Nick. Oh wait, you already are, you dumb piece of shit with a faggot-ass Satanic snake tattoo.

Somehow I think Nick will skip over the "repent" part of it. Then he's going to tell the faithful Christians what they should do to be more Christian.

Remember what this demon-possessed faggot constantly says about actual Christians (like the ones who saved his kids from him).

Nick is such a stereotype at this point. He needs to go to reddit, his true home.

Ouch! Sounds like someone is embarrassed he got caught in 4k getting trashy tattoos with his side hoe and being a stinky smelly outfit repeater.

Quit crying like a little bitch you stinking, filthy, child-abusing felon who is reading this thread right now, and just change your fucking clothes, loser. Preferably ones that have been through a washing machine recently.

 

[Law]

The biggest "conversion of heart" he could do would be to renounce e-fame completely and go back to lawyerin' to earn money to buy groceries and shit for his kids.

 

[AnOminous]

But the truth is that the moment the coke dries up then so will April and she'll be outta there, she's there for the drugs, not for Nick, and he knows it.

She's already a dried-up, nasty-ass, trailer trash wigger whore.

- No one can judge him. They don't have the facts. He likes watching them scramble when the FACTS come out that contradict their preconceptions.

Lol wut when has this ever happened? I suppose we've "scrambled" when the facts turn out even WORSE than what we were JOKING about.

- He mentions David with seeming ignorance. He doesn't seem to understand that David's great sin was taking another man's wife as his own.

Something that pisses me off more about Nick than his obvious atheism (he clearly does not believe in God and was faking it all along), but his illiteracy. I've never heard him be remotely right about ANYTHING in the Bible. David was punished for that shit for the rest of his life even AFTER repenting.

Nick will never repent. If there is a Hell, he's going there. His current life, which he chose, is also Hell. Suffer, Nick, you worthless cocksucking coke-snorting, child-abusing faggot piece of SHIT! We all know you're reading this right now you insufferable turd.

 

[Angry Crustacean]

The biggest "conversion of heart" he could do would be to renounce e-fame completely and go back to lawyerin' to earn money to buy groceries and shit for his kids.

The cocaine addiction is a bigger impediment to reunification for Nick and Kayla in my opinion. I believe they could downgrade their expenses and be able to survive on whatever the trust fund pays, so his employment isn't an issue. However, his unwillingness to cooperate with KCHHS means reunification will not happen. Even if he manages to miraculously get his criminal case tossed, that is a separate issue from reunification as I understand it.

His inability to admit his fault in his criminal charges indicate a serious lack of remorse, so if he can't get his criminal case tossed on a technicality, I think the judge will think long and hard about the terms of the presumptive suspended sentence.

 

[AnOminous]

- He then brags about his personal innovation which is bringing literary criticism techniques and deconstructionism to reading the bible.

Remember, this faggot is bringing critical theory, a postmodern philosophy invented by French faggot S&M pervert child molesters like Michel Foucault, who deliberately infected minor males with the AIDS he eventually died from, to the Bible. Literal desecration of the Scriptures.

Honestly if anything, people that have “golden child” siblings and/or narc parents can probably relate to this older brother bigtime. Oldest siblings in general probably relate to him.

That's why it's a Bible story in the first place. There are plenty of people in the position of the older brother and they do resent being in that situation, and it isn't just because they're dicks or something. The story is meant to explain why they should set that natural feeling aside.

The moral, obvious to people who aren't sociopathic faggots like Nick, is REPENTANCE.

This seething faggot hasn't even admitted he's done anything wrong much less repented for it. He is not the prodigal son. He is the faggot who needs to be punished.

I think he's probably not doing drugs, or at least timing his use so he tests clean. He made a big deal about how he's submitting clean drug tests for the CPS.

I'm not going to believe that unless I see it, and even then, he's probably cheating and I seriously doubt he's doing hair tests that would actually prove something. Nick is a lying liar who lies and is almost certainly lying now.

he definitely sounds like he's coking out. the constant hyper string of thoughts plus sounds like his mouth is trying to catch up with his brain.

He has the delusion he shares with all cokeheads that whatever drug-addled gibberish is coming out of his mouth is articulate and witty, and not just the dope ramblings of a complete shithead loser.

The way junkie Rekieta butchers scripture it tells me he has not been sealed by the Holy Spirit which means he's not a believer, which means there is no grace offered.

Nick is possessed by demons.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

So. Is the consensus that this is pill stream, or no? His pupils do look pinned out in that one pic, and the level of horsesh and rambling incoherence @Himedall All-seeing Waifu details sounds like one of his coke streams.

He actually sounded somewhat sober, just coping hard.

Apologies everybody, I had a busy day and was away from my PC during the extremely RARE occurrence of a Balldo man stream.

Locals must have changed it's backend infrastructure and no longer allows my third-party download accelerator application to fetch the video file, so I had to use the analog hole to screen record it. WARNING: Video may still be processing, enjoy!

Rekieta Locals Stream 21-07-24

View attachment 6219837

I just use CoCoNut Chrome extension.

Some religious analysis of Nick's latest stream:

I agree with this in main, but I'll add that Nick fails to see that the point of the lesson is to see ourselves in EACH character and ponder what we would/should do in their place. Nick is assigning himself the most palatable role of the forgiven without wanting to do any of the suffering involved. A lot of people want to be heroes, but want to skip all thr pain and struggle that made them who they are. They become unironic 'ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE ME!' creeps.

TL;DR: You are supposed to introspect in these readings, and Nick is too obsessed with telling other people what they need to learn.

Oh I love Nose’s interpretation of the Lost Son Parable. I already knew it but reread both the KJV and NIV, and here it is in a nutshell.

Spoiler

The son asks his father for his half of inheritance early, then fucks off on his own to a “distant country.” Consider what era this took place in, so communication between family was exceedingly difficult. The father more than likely had no idea what his son was doing during his absence. Then after squandering his wealth and being forced to resort to caring for pigs, he says “Oh dang! I’ve fumbled the bag and seriously fucked up! I was so wrong! I must ask my dad for forgiveness!”

Upon returning to his family he is welcomed by his father who, remember, likely has no idea
what did and did not transpire with the son during his absence. He can only infer what may have happened based on his appearance and repentant behavior. He probably learned more after talking to the Prodigal Son for a while afterward.

There was nothing “judgemental” about the father. The older brother is judgemental and
resentful, but he has a good reason for being that way. He didn’t squander his wealth or engage in any kind of debauchery and chose to remain at home with his family. Why wouldn’t he be upset that his shitass younger brother got a big “welcome home, it’s all good bro” party?

Honestly if anything, people that have “golden child” siblings and/or narc parents can probably relate to this older brother bigtime. Oldest siblings in general probably relate to him.

Consider that the Prodigal Son came to the conclusion he was wrong and “fumbled the bag” on his own and where his life of debauchery took him in the end. Nick is retarded so he didn't or chose to ignore it.

The older son was in the wrong, but had a different issue. There are more than one applications in these stories. Sometimes in life we are the fuck up younger brother ans we need to follow his model back to a proper path, but when we are not, we need to NOT follow the older brother's example. We should not be too caught up amd sure that we are always one character.

This is what Nick is missing.

I was thinking about this. Does he have to go to a new church because he doesn't have custody of his kids, and only supervised visits? So seeing his kid at church would be like an unsupervised visit and the state wouldn't be ok with it?

I'm sure he'd feel embarassed to be attending his old church anyway, I just wonder if the state forced him to not go there, or if they could even do that.

If he went to his old church, even if they somehow "accepted him back" it would literally only be seen as a way to taunt them or retaliate for turning him in. Also he would be shunned almost certainly regardless. Honestly I am curious how much of this has bled into the new church.

In such a small town, do you think that the minosters are talking? We will know if he slergs out about it.

Also, I wonder if this attendance is a ploy he came up with to try to bamboozle CPS, or if he is trying to placate Kayla?

Everything Nick asserts about his interpretation of the bible is completely self serving, especially the concept of grace, that god will excuse anything you do if you say a couple of hail Mary's afterwards. The more you lean on this crutch the less you mean it and Grace isn't about words but about the meaning behind those words. If what Nick says before god has no real meaning put into it then there is no Grace to be found for him.

I'm sure Nick could cleverly misinterpret the bible in a million different funny and weird ways that all culminate in that "Everything I ever do is proper and correct" and he's so prideful and arrogant that he'll do it every time. What Nick is doing with the bible has been done countless times before, he's not original, and it almost always ends up badly.

Nick is taking the most convenient and self-swrving interpretation (when there are many) amd proclaiming it as the ONLY one that matters when it is helpful to him.

Yeah, Nick's ideas are more like the ye olde concept of papal indulgences from hundreds of years ago that became popular during Martin Luther's time where people thought their salvation had a pay-to-play exploit. You want to sin? No problem. Just buy an indulgence. No true repentance required.

This is funny given the fact that he lambasted the medieval church for not wanting people to 'just read the Bible'.

There is a balance. Nick I'd setting up a flash dichotomy and flawed analogy to try to incite passions based on dislike of a commonly accepted bad thing.

 

[Captain Manning]

Why is he streaming from the dog’s bathroom? Are mommy and mommy fighting?

I read this and lol'd.

Does anybody else think there's no way this polycule will last? Like even if they faced absolutely no external criticism whatsoever (i.e. the Farms didn't exist) there's no way there's not gonna be serious internal friction at some point.

Those bitches are gonna be at each other's throats at some point, if they haven't been already, and it's gonna be funny reading about it.

And no, I refuse to believe the bible ever endorsed threesomes. I hope God turns Spicer into a smoldering pile of salt, this morning.

It doesn't.

The closest it ever came was the story of Lot and his daughters in the cave. But that was a weird situation where they mistakenly believed God had blown up the world again (instead of just two cities). It would not have happened otherwise, and I don't think the Bible "endorses" it.

 

[AnOminous]

The biggest "conversion of heart" he could do would be to renounce e-fame completely and go back to lawyerin' to earn money to buy groceries and shit for his kids.

I don't care what crimes some poor dude committed, it's a violation of the right to counsel to have an incompetent lunatic like Nick as a lawyer. You should only be given a lawyer like Nick AFTER getting convicted while represented by COMPETENT counsel. As the sentence.

To be unburdened by what has been

Is this cocaine-addled cuck actually wearing the Viballdo while raving and coping and seething and blaspheming the Bible?