Ava Chris Tyson / Christopher Stephen Tyson / “Christine Tyson” / “Chris The Meme God” - MrBeast’s litigious troon sidekick & divorcé. Lolicon-loving narcissistic queer

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
View attachment 6227036View attachment 6227046
Not sure if it was covered in this thread, but Chris was apparently posting lewds on his private account like the fucking autogynephile he is. The replies to his tweets are full of tranny chasers lusting after him:
View attachment 6227042View attachment 6227084
"Untuck" as in this freak wants Kris to pull his cock out of his panties.

Upon further inspection I found some of the lewds he posted which got reposted by a troon chaser subreddit centered around him, God help my clipboard and God help your eyes:
There's definitely more but I refuse to stomach that subreddit.
Kind of crazy tbh that mrbeast didn't cut ties with her when she started posting ass pics for everyone to see.
 
I’m starting to think we need a thread on Charlie at some point
No way, he doesn't have direct milk himself as a lolcow. He's the biggest commentary slop drop creator specifically because he's so inoffensive and devoid of interesting controversy.

The few things he has done which are scummy are mostly forgettable anyways, like sweeping for xQc cheating in chess tournaments with cash prizes because they were both part of the same streaming collective. Even that was nearly half a decade ago and there's nothing to really discuss about it.
 
Still a bit weird fence sitting from Muta here. What Chris says is a flat out lie. There are no people encouraging real-life activity or cowtipping, those who do get warned and eventually threadbanned. Probably has KWF mixed up with doxbin or something.
There will always be one wiredo who does, who will get negrated to the ground and berated by other members and I've even seen mod notes on said posts with a warning sign and an edit saying something like "don't do this".

I mean, we have 113,000 forum members at this point, there's bound to be some poop touchers in there, but it's neither encouraged or tolerated by site culture.

And as far as I'm aware none of us think swatting is funny or cool.
 
Brain scans cannot identify if a brain is female or male

This is outdated and incorrect:

1721828038414.png

Machine learning can sort male and female MRIs without a spec of overlap or confusion. Trannies BTFO. Cope & Seethe. "Female brain in a male body" my ass.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6228251
View attachment 6228252
View attachment 6228256
(https://archive.fo/Z3hYG)
I found an archive of some of the replies.

This tweet in particular is disgusting:
View attachment 6228262
None of this surprises me, Oney used to pal around with actual trannies and have them on his show. I get the impression he's chaser, and as such a porn-sick individual who will tolerate a lot. He is a step removed from Zach and Michael, but he is definitely involved in the show. Still, I doubt this would sink Smiling Friends in and of itself.

I do wonder if Zach has ever said anything in defense of Shad, that would be pretty damning.
 
This is outdated and incorrect:

View attachment 6228863

Machine learning can sort male and female MRIs without a spec of overlap or confusion. Trannies BTFO. Cope & Seethe. "Female brain in a male body" my ass.
I've seen this bandied about, though I'm not a neuroscientist so a lot of the jargon in the paper itself goes over my head, however on a high level I'd like to see a replication of these findings specifically singling out trans-identifying individuals to see if there's any more similarity in the measured effects than between the averages of each biological sex. I have a funny feeling that would be a hard paper to get funded in modern academia, though.
 
No because there's literally nothing wrong with that, why equate that to jerking to drawn cp?
It still would not matter though. If you understand the minds of normies, they would see me as a bad person for consuming Moonman for the same reasons normies see Kris Tyson as a bad person for consuming Shadbase because that's how normies are.

I don't disagree with you but this is just an insight to how the normie mind works; the normie is an optics cuck.

If you admitted to a normie that you consume Moonman, the normies would still cancel you and dogpile on you regardless because that is the way normies are. Most normies still think Kiwi Farms are bad people because we use the naughty gamer words, it doesn't matter that expose people like Kris Tyson, we're still bad because we use the word 'nigger' (hence why Mutahar still condemned us even after exposing someone like Kris Tyson).
 
I don’t like Mr. Beast (proud to say I haven’t watched even a second of any video) but consider the following two options:
  1. Chris has some type of dirt on Mr. Beast whether it is sex pestery related, financial, familial, etc. He knew if he fired him there was a big risk that Chris would go nuclear on social media with the “tea” and would have absolute impunity due to his status as the current special pet group of current year politics.
  2. Chris has no dirt but would go nuclear with the “I was fired only because my supposed friends don’t respect me as a true and honest wahmen!” Unfortunately this group of people, despite being an exceedingly small minority, are extremely vocal with an even louder group of defenders. Corpos treat them like they’re sacred cash cows and thus put them on a pedestal. They would 100% choose whatever dollars or social credit they get from appeasing the rainbow alphabet than the revenue Mr. Beast generates.
If it’s the former then he deserves whatever is coming to him and that can’t come soon enough. If it is the latter then I guess I might have a modicum of understanding.

Also consider that people generally don’t want to believe bad things about friends or family.
Denial over the behavior and actions of loved ones can run deep and in particularly bad cases become an inexcusable, unhealthy delusion. Maybe Mr. Beast thought the Shad art poster was some kind of funny meme or hung on the wall ironically. Maybe he thought his friend was just in weird phase.

Nobody really knows right now (myself included, though I lean toward option 1) but I don’t think it is fair to assume Mr. Beast being naive or in denial is impossible.
 
Mr Beast gives me much more insidious vibes, I’m not sure how to describe it, but it’s very uncanny valley. You know how Eskimo’s would recoil from a snake without knowing it was even a thing to worry about? Nature gives us these natural instincts, highly poisonous bugs are neon coloured, Jews physiognomy warns you to their doings. There’s something “wrong” with Mr Beast, and it’s been obvious since he called himself “beast” and counted to a million in one sitting.
I think the only thing he really cares about is influencing people. Not even 'being popular'; just influencing people. At some point he calculated that the best way to influence others was to make money and be inoffensive so that he can do big things that grab peoples' attention. He did some interview last year about how he wanted to be president one day, and has some kind of gameplan for how he will get there. He wants influence, and will do whatever he can do get there on his terms. Having branded food was the next step beyond just being a YouTuber.

The problem with trying to be inoffensive so that you can keep influencing people is that at some point, you're going to allow something to happen that shouldn't.
 
I've seen this bandied about, though I'm not a neuroscientist so a lot of the jargon in the paper itself goes over my head, however on a high level I'd like to see a replication of these findings specifically singling out trans-identifying individuals to see if there's any more similarity in the measured effects than between the averages of each biological sex.

The journo in the article basically says the same thing. Machine learning requires a lot of data so the best you will get is throwing a few troon MRIs into the existing model and seeing where they land (hint: there are no dots in the middle).

I have a funny feeling that would be a hard paper to get funded in modern academia, though.

This is the Neuroscience vs. Sociology reckoning that Pinker warned about in the 90's after the Sokal Hoax. Constructivist academics (all of them) look at that graph and rock back and forth nervously.
 
Back