Ava Chris Tyson / Christopher Stephen Tyson / “Christine Tyson” / “Chris The Meme God” - MrBeast’s litigious troon sidekick & divorcé. Lolicon-loving narcissistic queer

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Imagine trying to have the moral high ground in a situation like this :story: TTD can't come soon enough.

Woah, and look at whose decided to weigh in on this too! It's Nate the Lawyer, of Rackets reknown, taking a peek out of his lawtube fiefdom to comment on coomergate:

Not gonna bother with an archive, doubt this will get deleted/too large to upload. Someone else go for it pls.
PreserveTube makes archiving Youtube videos so easy that it's basically trivial.

PreserveTube archive
 
Do we have any idea how is trans widow is feeling rn?
no screw that, imagine being the little boy and now you have to grow up knowing your biological "woman"-father is sexually attracted to children and had weird interactions with minors

that takes a fucking toll on a child man, I genuinely feel bad and I hope he finds an actual father-figure to replace this pedo, and help him navigate such a complicated predicament
 
This is essentially the same as saying that if a child consents, it's not considered abuse.
GTScLj2asAAqLdP.jpeg
 
People should really just reframe the question in their minds to realise how absurd it is. "He didn't GROOM me" is becoming such a he said she said stupid ass conundrum that it allows the chomo to quietly deflect from the sidelines by throwing his money at publications.

Because people are fucking retarded it might really be better to ask them if they think it's ok that a grown ass man DMd a then 14 yo kid something about "noods" because the kid said he feels it was ok. Ask them if their child or lil brother was DMing a creep who associates with a cartoon child pornographer about sexual shit, how would they feel about that? Make it clear that it's not someone who draws fictional 1000 year old anime vampire children but REAL children instead, and they're now tangentially associated with your kid. Would they think that's cool?

Maybe that'll make people finally realise.
 
PreserveTube makes archiving Youtube videos so easy that it's basically trivial.

PreserveTube archive
to be sure you have things backed up locally, i always recommend yt-dlp-gui

People should really just reframe the question in their minds to realise how absurd it is. "He didn't GROOM me" is becoming such a he said she said stupid ass conundrum that it allows the chomo to quietly deflect from the sidelines by throwing his money at publications.

Because people are fucking retarded it might really be better to ask them if they think it's ok that a grown ass man DMd a then 14 yo kid something about "noods" because the kid said he feels it was ok. Ask them if their child or lil brother was DMing a creep who associates with a cartoon child pornographer about sexual shit, how would they feel about that? Make it clear that it's not someone who draws fictional 1000 year old anime vampire children but REAL children instead, and they're now tangentially associated with your kid. Would they think that's cool?

Maybe that'll make people finally realise.
if you break these things down to the point where it can't be intentionally misunderstood by a bad faith party it becomes so much harder for them to argue against it.
 
PreserveTube is convenient but remember it sometimes has audio issues and that link rot comes for us all.
Oh damn, I wasn't aware of its audio issues, thanks for the heads up.

As for the linkrot, it can help avoid that by allowing you to easily download the video from PreserveTube itself and then locally archiving here (as I've done in this post). However, that won't help with the audio issues. :'(



Mr beast in his interviews sounds super autistic but his actions are those of a sociopath which one is he?
Por que no los dos?
 
This is essentially the same as saying that if a child consents, it's not considered abuse.
View attachment 6233372
Most grooming victims defend their abusers saying they weren't abused due to they normalized the abuse, or the abuser convince them they wanted it/threaten them.

This is the worst defense anyone can use saying "the victim is ok with it," that is the whole issue with grooming is they normalize the abuse.
 
so his thirsting over drawn IRL children courtesy of shadman has been made public for YEARS, and nobody raised a stink about that?
A lot of people don't care if a man has drawn stuff cause it can be plausibly "fictional" or "protected speech", but they will care a lot if a man actually messages a minor. Not saying this is how it ought to be, just saying this is how many people see it.
I think one of the reasons trans people are disliked so much is the insistence of keeping up with using pronouns even if the person is terrible.
Remember when "Chris Chan raped HER mother with HER penis"?
Men with autogynephilia get their jollies from convincing themselves that they are totally and completely women. When they get reminded that no one actually thinks that and pronouns are a social nicety, their fantasy bubble is popped and the mantrum begins. Cause if you don't call an abusive male rapist "she", then it proves that you "don't actually see them as women" and only use pronouns for transes you respect or are friendly with.
I predict that more people are going to start talking like Jimmy's lawyer-statement: avoiding pronouns altogether. Which will probably make transwomen seethe about "degendering" cause they know it's a refusal to obey.
Whew, if only other troons family members could be this honest.
A lot of them are. Katy Tur detailed how her transwoman father was violent and abusive in her memoir. childrenoftransitioners.org and transwidowsvoices.org have a lot of very honest stories from children and ex-wives, respectively.
 
Most grooming victims defend their abusers saying they weren't abused due to they normalized the abuse, or the abuser convince them they wanted it/threaten them.
People who were abused are also very likely to go ahead and abuse others themselves too.

That's to say they are never the sole arbiters of whether or not they were abused for a lot of reasons.
 
wait, let me clarify this, so Lava, (the alleged groomed minor), says he wasnt groomed at all, and that he was just doing edgy and inappropriate jokes with chris, but since everyone now knows that he's into underage kiddos, chris really WAS trying to have some sort of sexual relationship with this boy, is that correct?

this is a bit new to me, because from what I have seen from internet drama, its almost always the victim who goes on the attack and almost never defends the accused, very rarely I see where the opposite happens
 
Whatever, all I want to know is who the FUCK associates with Shadman, how, why? I get it, a lot of e-famous retards are gooners because that seems to be a common consequence of being the new money version of being a celebrity. Ok, let's assume you're jacking off to some anime-whatever all day like you're Nick Rekieta. WHY >shadman THOUGH? WHY? How could you associate with that level of filth in good conscience? Let's disregard the Keem daughter child pornographer Shad arc and be extremely forgiving. Shadman always drew disgusting fucking shit regardless, and you're hanging out with, and around that guy? Fucking kill yourself.
 
Back