- Joined
- Oct 16, 2023
Since menstruation is being discussed I have a question:Just gonna requote myself here:
is fear of blood less common in women because of repeat exposure?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since menstruation is being discussed I have a question:Just gonna requote myself here:
I almost cried that I'm not alone on this holy shit, every time I've complained about it I get looked at like I'm crazyon the topic of things that are mostly just annoying: seatbelts. i don't know if this is consistent across all makes and models, but oh my god i cannot fucking stand how, if you have anything larger than an a-cup, the seatbelt slides up until it's right against your neck. no amount of adjusting keeps it from moving around either.
i'm sure the design that only considered male bodies worked great back in the fifties, but there's no reason not to change it in current year where almost every single woman i know has a driver's license that she uses on the regular.
What bras do you own where putting it between is an option? Asking for a friendSeatbelts and other straps in general get weird above an A cup.
"Don't put it between the boobs, it look sexual"
"Don't put it under the boobs, that's not safe."
"Don't put it over the boobs, it will choke you."
This is entirely anecdotal, but I only know two people who are afraid of blood (one man, one woman). In both cases, it's caused by trauma from seeing gruesome deaths, so maybe it's even?Since menstruation is being discussed I have a question:
is fear of blood less common in women because of repeat exposure?
i could be wrong, but wouldn't the fact it doesn't sit properly on the rider cause additional injuries if there's a wreck? i feel there's a risk of all that forward momentum concentrating on the wrong areas, like, you know, the fucking neck instead of the ribcage.Seatbelts and other straps in general get weird above an A cup.
"Don't put it between the boobs, it look sexual"
"Don't put it under the boobs, that's not safe."
"Don't put it over the boobs, it will choke you."
You are correct. The strap is supposed to go like this:i could be wrong, but wouldn't the fact it doesn't sit properly on the rider cause additional injuries if there's a wreck? i feel there's a risk of all that forward momentum concentrating on the wrong areas, like, you know, the fucking neck instead of the ribcage.
I think this may be part of what made Mean Girls such a cultural touchstone. We've all known a Regina George. I'd make the same argument for Jennifer's Body, which for some reason was marketed towards teen boys but really is more a feminist revenge story that explores toxic friendships and how they can change during adolescence.There's all these fucking buddy comedies and memes and shit centered on the male coming-of-age experience and all the awkward shenanigans that come with it. Boys can watch that shit and feel seen. We don't get that same privilege. Not really, anyway. It is incredibly rare to find a piece of mainstream media with an actually realistic, relatable representation of female adolescence. Tbh, the shit targeted at boys, like Diary of a Wimpy Kid, was usually way more relatable than the shit meant to be targeted at girls.
Fun fact. The movie Mean Girls was based on a psychology book for adolescent teen girls, "Queen bees & Wannabees"I think this may be part of what made Mean Girls such a cultural touchstone. We've all known a Regina George.
I wouldn't. Outside of Patrick Star threatening to feed someone their testicles that movie kind of sucks ass.I'd make the same argument for Jennifer's Body
Given some of the posts here, it sounds like Cuties might be a candidate. Not necessarily for the contents (I haven't seen it and refuse to do so) but for it's, I don't know, aura?, of inappropriate sexualisation and general (male gaze) sleaze of it.realistic, relatable representation of female adolescence
I mean, that's what it's supposed to be about. But it's so inherently creepy that the "artistic message" of the film kinda takes a backseat to the deep feeling of unease.Given some of the posts here, it sounds like Cuties might be a candidate. Not necessarily for the contents (I haven't seen it and refuse to do so) but for it's, I don't know, aura?, of inappropriate sexualisation and general (male gaze) sleaze of it.
I was polite and possibly helpful
I remember Thirteen being fairly decent despite it's shoe string budget. Although that one was more of a drama and not comedy.I think this may be part of what made Mean Girls such a cultural touchstone. We've all known a Regina George. I'd make the same argument for Jennifer's Body, which for some reason was marketed towards teen boys but really is more a feminist revenge story that explores toxic friendships and how they can change during adolescence.
That shot overlaid on a SpongeBob clip was the reason I watched the film in the first place. I’d heard someone call it a cult classic and looked it up before, but all the marketing made it seem like a boy’s film I wouldn’t be interested in. Was pleasantly surprised to find it a decent adolescence story about toxic friends. I’m not calling it a masterpiece, just terribly mismarketed.I wouldn't. Outside of Patrick Star threatening to feed someone their testicles that movie kind of sucks ass.
It's funnier actually, he says he'll turn someone's nuts into a door knocker.
reminds me of when one of my clients got into a car accident and the seatbelt left a nasty bruise behind -- i assume it would've been this bad if she wasn't just pulling out from a turn. and making seatbelts less likely to garrote someone would be such an easy fix too. just put the top anchor thing on a little track with locking notches where you can adjust it up or down according to your height, weight, and general preference, and wow would you look at that, now everyone can actually be safe and comfortable instead of the most perfectly average-sized adult men.And if you need some additional motivation for why you want to invest in these, this is what an accident injury looks like (NSFW):
Description: Injured breasts of an elderly woman caused by a seatbelt cutting a breast in halfThis private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
What is "feminine chat behavior"?Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems for women it's more of a bind, because it causes you to have to negate what you are to prevent this kind of attention. Or more likely, just have to deal with it. It's so strange: no picture, no feminine chat behavior, no age, no voice and that's enough to get the attention.
Nevermind that stuff guys can talk about doing or weird body stuff they deal with, and it's chuckled over and commiserated, BUT if a girl says it?We can't freely relate stories of our awkward childhood/coming-of-age experiences the way that men can because of the way we are uniquely sexualized. My favorite male vidyagame youtubers/streamers can openly, unashamedly tell stories of the embarrassing/gross/stupid shit they did as kids, and it's funny! Media like South Park can have joke after joke based on the 9-year-old male characters' sex and masturbation mishaps, and it's funny! If we try to talk about our experiences with that sort of thing, or perhaps try to portray them through art, men will inevitably just treat it as jerkoff material. Someone else has said this before, but you could never have a gender-swapped South Park because when boys do that stuff, it's comedy, but when girls do that stuff, it's porn.I know it's dumb, but I'm really envious of them for that lol.
Back in the day it was using emoticons at all.What is "feminine chat behavior"?
Or using exclamation points correctlyBack in the day it was using emoticons at all.