"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Lidl Drip said:
She and Pippa literally sang a song about a little girl getting raped together.

Click to expand...
To give both of them the benefit of the doubt, the song they are singing was made by the hypocritical VTuber Nyanners, who is infamous for completely denouncing her old “4chan part” and started melting down whenever someone mentions it, which caused huge controversy. This could very well just be a dig at her retardation, as this stream was around the same time as her meltdown.
 
Last edited:
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MrReeShopper, Tenko Hinanawi, keklmao and 6 others
Dire Dire Cocks said:
To give both of them the benefit of the doubt, the song they are singing was made by the hypocritical VTuber Nyanners, who is infamous for completely denouncing her old “4chan part” and started melting down whenever someone mentions it, which caused huge controversy. This could very well just be a dig at her retardation, as this stream was around the same time tad her meltdown.
Click to expand...
They joke about the "Nyanners' bridge" being burned when Kirsche talks about her roommate being pissed about Nyanners' hypocrisy. Kirsche also (jokingly) mentions that if she were to collab with Nyanners (meaning she didn't consider it off the table at the time) that she would have to get her roommate to leave for the duration.

I only watched about two minutes from before they started singing, and I don't want to watch after the singing or during it because both of them are incredibly fucking cringe.

Edit: I can't spell "roommate" correctly.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Markass the Worst and Dire Dire Cocks
Dire Dire Cocks said:
To give both of them the benefit of the doubt, the song they are singing was made by the hypocritical VTuber Nyanners, who is infamous for completely denouncing her old “4chan part” and started melting down whenever someone mentions it, which caused huge controversy. This could very well just be a dig at her retardation, as this stream was around the same time tad her meltdown.
Click to expand...
They did an entire stream together where they defend lolicon.

Screenshot_20240726-163300.png
>Kirsche recites a lolicon meme

wow she sure does that a lot, surely it's only ironic

Screenshot_20240726-163442.png
If these arguments sound familiar it's because they are straight out of the lolipedo playbook.

Screenshot_20240726-163630.png

Just fucking vile.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Arminius, Markass the Worst, CrispyLegs and 13 others
Null said:

In all the "Illegal" states, you must carry even a fetus doomed to die at birth to term. I think some even block incest and rape.

The based conservatives want women raped by niggers to carry nonviable mixed race babies to term so they can watch it die. That's not hysteria, that's the world. And then you're like "durrr women don't vote conservative as much as men". no shit dumbfuck faggot.
Click to expand...
Oh look, more shit I've been screaming from the rooftops for years and getting shunned for it. I hope all of our incel friends enjoy the accelerated replacement they're celebrating as schools and gibbs programs are swarmed with with demonic shitskin rape babies born from teenage girls who have had their entire futures, both professional and familial, violently robbed from them by Africans, pajeets, goat fuckers and beaners. That's the "based" future and present they wanted and are getting, just because dey supah angwy that we won't suck them their penises. They'll never let go of their brain rotting Virgin Rage, dude.

Ingmar Aspergman said:
I don’t think the women of KF have much of a reason for. But somehow that is important enough to tolerate all the other shit that you supposedly hate. But how does this affect you personally?
Click to expand...
I can very easily tell that you're not white because you lack the cognitive function to process cause/effect and empathy. But if you want to play by that set of rules, then I could argue that you have no reason to care one way or the other about abortion, since you can't get pregnant and obviously aren't getting anyone else pregnant in any remotely moral context. Aborting darkies should be a priority because your kind must be prevented from continuing to breed like rats, especially when it's so oftentimes done by force, and oftentimes on gentile girls at that. Darkies GTFO of our countries, our economies and most importantly, our bodies.

BTW, how flat is your forehead?
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Disagree
Reactions: CorvidFag, CrispyLegs, The Honeyed Cat and 6 others
Ingmar Aspergman said:
I think those policies are retarded and do push women away, but if the Republican Party was 100% pro-Abortion I do not think it would make that significant of a difference, disregarding the nobodies you won’t stop giving attention to.
Click to expand...
meh, probably about a 10 point difference, you're right, nbd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Markass the Worst
Ingmar Aspergman said:
@Nonconsentual Pronouns so how is voting left going to help TND lol.
Click to expand...
right now you have to make a snap decision between two lives for you:

1) you must suck a dick on demand every day for the rest of your life. this dick may choose to leave you for another person he prefers at any point. if you have children you are solely responsible for it. you are not entitled to any compensation if he leaves you. you are considered a bad person if he leaves you. every single aspect of your existence depends on this person and therefore your sole objective in life is to make sure this dick does not leave you because if he does it's fucking over.

2) you can work in accounting at Mr. Shekelberg's very-steady-and-reliable megacorp and retire with a 20 year pension.

what do you think is a more attractive option to most people when you reduce it to these elements? why do you think people prefer liberty over no liberty?

you're dense, dumb, and wrong.

the only way to beat #2 is to make the option of building a family more safe, secure, and fulfilling than a regular job.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Core Theorist, 3MMA, Anti Alien Alarm and 32 others
Null said:
1) you must suck a dick on demand every day for the rest of your life. this dick may choose to leave you for another person he prefers at any point. if you have children you are solely responsible for it. you are not entitled to any compensation if he leaves you. you are considered a bad person if he leaves you. every single aspect of your existence depends on this person and therefore your sole objective in life is to make sure this dick does not leave you because if he does it's fucking over.
Click to expand...
Can you point me to a real politician who is saying this shit and not @MohammedRealG on Instagram.

2) you can work in accounting at Mr. Shekelberg's very-steady-and-reliable megacorp while also being sexually harassed by Muslims and troons ,without any means of repercussion, and will die alone in a nation that wants you dead.
Click to expand...
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Peace Or Love, marisa #, Great General Ri Shin and 8 others
I think it's probably on topic for now, is there good reason to think that the world was better off pre-sexual-revolution (pre-birth-control pill)?
I've found a web page with information suggesting that it is. (https://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm)
I don't know what you guys think the solution to our broken modern-world is, but might a large part of the solution be re-arrangeing the world into something like what we had before sex became regarded as simple recreation?
It would however, mean getting ALL the puzzle pieces back together, and I'm not sure what the exact formula is for minimizing the Ethan Ralphs and Chris Tysons of the world. Maybe heavier emphasis on the consensus of the greater family for the romantic decisions of individuals?

If something like I suggested isn't a good solution, then is there a better idea?
Something I always found sort of interesting is if we go full trans-human, and become like an ant-colony, with all our reproduction centralized through state-owned artificial wombs.
I'm sure such a thing would quickly turn dystopic, but it's still an interesting bit of world-building to me.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lidl Drip
Only around 1% of abortions occur because the fetus is a product of rape. Less .5% of abortions occur because it’s a product of incest.
It’s really a non-factor on the question of abortion. The vast VAST majority of abortions occur for other reasons, namely the person doesn’t want or can’t afford a child at that time.

I understand the reason why emotional appeals about rape and incest abortions are brought up, but they’re so statically insignificant that acting like bans on it is in any way affecting the majority of the populace is about as true as saying a ban on tranny surgeries would.
At that point, you’re asking pro-life republicans to compromise deeply held principles for what amounts to edge cases. Yeah sure, politicians don’t actually have principles and whatnot. But actively encouraging abandoning the principles they at least espouse for such a small amount of cases doesn’t really strike me as a sound argument.
 
  • Disagree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Slurs McKenzie, Great General Ri Shin, CorvidFag and 6 others
Fester Chavez said:
I think it's probably on topic for now, is there good reason to think that the world was better off pre-sexual-revolution (pre-birth-control pill)?
I've found a web page with information suggesting that it is. (https://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm)
I don't know what you guys think the solution to our broken modern-world is, but might a large part of the solution be re-arrangeing the world into something like what we had before sex became regarded as simple recreation?
It would however, mean getting ALL the puzzle pieces back together, and I'm not sure what the exact formula is for minimizing the Ethan Ralphs and Chris Tysons of the world. Maybe heavier emphasis on the consensus of the family as a whole for the romantic decisions of individuals?

If something like I suggested isn't a good solution, then is there a better idea?
Something I always found sort of interesting is if we go full trans-human, and become like an ant-colony, with all our reproduction centralized through state-owned artificial wombs.
I'm sure such a thing would quickly turn dystopic, but it's still an interesting bit of world-building to me.
Click to expand...
You believe that increase in violent crime is due to birth control?

:story:

What do we do about violent crime? Deport all non-white men back to their countries first of all. But even "le based republicans" don't want to do that, they would rather cater to them and try (fruitlessly) to gain their votes.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Blackhole, CorvidFag, Inside your walls and 12 others
Lidl Drip said:
But even "le based republicans" don't want to do that, they would rather cater to them and try (fruitlessly) to gain their votes.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure this is baiting fedposting by insinuating nobody wants to do that

You'd probably start freaking out and reeing anyways and this is purely a vehicle to try to discredit people you disagree with not something you actually want
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Great General Ri Shin, Chuck McGill and 8 others
Lidl Drip said:
What do we do about violent crime? Deport all non-white men back to their countries first of all. But even "le based republicans" don't want to do that, they would rather cater to them and try (fruitlessly) to gain their votes.
Click to expand...
Trump literally wants to build a wall and send every taco nigger back. You're wrong.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: Elm Sinclair, CorvidFag, Taxidermied Rat and 13 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back