"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Dude “cheddar ain’t the best” brought down the sticker notifications and Americans love borty more than cheese. We’re fucked for weeks.
So this whole "Lidl and Null have a spergout for five pages and the rest of the thread doesn't take it well" is only temporary, right? We can stop being the biggest, most autistic jackasses who take everything someone else says out of context and as bad faith as possible on the capital-I Internet in a day or so right? At least before the next MATO?
 
Just in case, also a local archive.
View attachment 6217419
Good thing you did this as it's now been pulled from Youtube.

View attachment 6238135

Video gone

Does anyone have the reuploads of his other Bohemian Grove videos, they are also privated.
2 of them are still on PreserveTube. Unknown if there were more.

Bohemian Grove Infiltration
Bohemian Grove Infiltration Pt. 2

I can't upload them as local archives so it'd be appreciated if someone else could before they're gone.
 
So this whole "Lidl and Null have a spergout for five pages and the rest of the thread doesn't take it well" is only temporary, right?
Whenever null talks about wamen, his ballwasher alleged natal woman appears as a faithful lapdog in an instant, providing instant validation. Just throw lidl on an ignore list, then all you'll see of them is occasional angry sticker and nothing else, like a bad smell lingering after a used tampon got thrown out.

The counter to that is that just because you experienced it doesn’t mean it’s anymore accurate. Flinging anecdotal evidence and lived experiences at each other is a fruitless exercise.
Anecdotal evidence of something existing is a proof in itself. Anecdotal evidence of something not existing is instantly disproved by the former.
 
You are completely wrong. Young people now are having less sex than their grandparents generation. The reason you think there is "more sex" is because you watch porn all day.
Not all day, but yeah I watch too much. I acknowledge there being less sex nowadays. The sex that is occuring is too often still of the degenerate type that, when it produces children, produces broken people.

And porn is, from what I can tell, a fairly direct consequence of the sexual revolution. The casualization of sex, makes sexualization of all types more casual. Makes porn less societally shameful.
So, yes, there's less sex. But there is much much more sexual degeneracy.

And to show I'm not contradicting myself. The period I'm referring to as "having more sex" is the decades immediately after the sexual revolution.
Those years set the stage for the decades of stagnant degeneracy we're in now.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Axiom.
Less people are having sex, but those who are engage in it a lot more than those in the past.
Is this based on a real study or based on the incel 80:20 meme? Let's be real, the reason you think this is because you aren't having sex, but you watch a lot of porn giving you the impression that people are having lots of sex, but you are for some unfair reason excluded, which you find frustrating. Your cope for this is "birth control" or "feminism" so you want to ban birth control and take away women's rights purely out of spite because you think it will lead to other people also not having sex. Its really quite transparent.
 
The counter to that is that just because you experienced it doesn’t mean it’s anymore accurate. Flinging anecdotal evidence and lived experiences at each other is a fruitless exercise.
Affirmative action is real and applies to women, the whole 'its impossible for a woman to become an engineer' thing doesn't exist and hasnt for like 20 years minimum. Some of the laziest and most incompetent people at my workplace (and previous one) are women because they are desperate for DEI points due to falling well short of their diversity goal of 50% female. There are exceptions its not like competent women don't exist but broadly speaking they are clearly preferentially hired (although brown people are on average worse some of those show up not knowing any programming languages at all).

The latest place has a DEI URL on the internal homepage (it in fact says 'Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion') explaining this and afaik many places do so I don't understand how this could be construed as a conspiracy theory
 
Last edited:
Whenever null talks about wamen, his ballwasher alleged natal woman appears as a faithful lapdog in an instant, providing instant validation. Just throw lidl on an ignore list, then all you'll see of them is occasional angry sticker and nothing else, like a bad smell lingering after a used tampon got thrown out.
Lidl Derangement Syndrome is so real and I'm tired of pretending it isn't.

Y'all niggas are so damaged by someone disagreeing with you on the Internet, it's insane.
 
Does this not directly disprove the theory that more access to birth control leads to more sex?
Ah I see what you’re getting at now. My bad.
Idk if it directly disproves it. Or at least, that depends on exactly what we set the parameters as.
Like, it doesn’t necessarily disprove causation. E.g. that all else being equal, a person with access to birth control will have more sex than a person without. Because so many other societal changes have occurred that we can’t really say all else is equal now. But that’s also something arguably impossible to test empirically.
But I would agree with your more general thrust, that a society with greater access to birth control will not always show an increase in sexual activity.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Axiom.
Is this based on a real study or based on the incel 80:20 meme? Let's be real, the reason you think this is because you aren't having sex, but you watch a lot of porn giving you the impression that people are having lots of sex, but you are for some unfair reason excluded, which you find frustrating. Your cope for this is "birth control" or "feminism" so you want to ban birth control and take away women's rights purely out of spite because you think it will lead to other people also not having sex. Its really quite transparent.
When da reply includes fanfiction
 
When did I say women are evil? Is it the abortion thing?

I don't consider aborting babies inherently evil.

I do consider it [psychopathic] if a woman doesn't feel sad when she has to do it, because it is killing an innocent human life, and such things deserve grief.
Same with the father.

Abortion is a sad thing, but not [necessarily] a shameful thing.
If a woman does not want to have a child, or as is most often the case, more children, she feels a strong sense of relief after having completed the procedure. PDF

Abortions are dropping off anyway, and White women were never the greatest cohort.
image_2024-07-26_164839093.png
 
Anecdotal evidence of something existing is a proof in itself
Oh don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying anecdotal evidence is pointless. I almost noted that it does show that at least one instance of something exists, and is exceptionally useful for stuff like falsifying.
It’s just that when discussing stuff like policy and societal trends, as is the case here, it’s not that useful. It’s exactly the same as the lived experiences ideas, and how it’s used to prove America is racist or whatnot.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Axiom.
Null, Cloudflare doesn’t make money because they have 50% of the Internet but so much is behind a free plan.

And their DDOS shit tricks only work because they have so much of the Internet routing through them, giving them leeway with transit providers.

But the moment they try to monetize it, that shit stops working and people move on, then they will have to start paying.

They’re actually probably kinda fucked.

Source: moved company websites off cloudflare free because fuck those guys, and shit still works. Who knows what the fuck Akamai does to DDOS mitigate but it doesn’t require SSL termination and other shitty shit.

Cloudflare - the fucking overgrown worthless web application firewall that people think is worth money.
 
Lidl drip, do you have an idea on how to fix modern society? I'm pretty sure you agree it's fucked.
Assuming you think men are the main problem, do you think men's behavior can be fixed culturally?

If not culturally, maybe through gene-tinkering?

Or do you think men as sentient beings ought to be eliminated and reduced to genelines?

Of course that third option would be pretty hard to implement if you aren't able to implement it globally. Since nations that still have sentient men would probably be able to take over pretty easilly.
Second option too, if it fucks with men's combat ability too much.
 
I just want to know what the most popular idea of the Fix is.
And what the best vector for applying the Fix is.
Religion, ideology, genetics, culture?
What if humanity itself is just fundamentally broken on the global scale? Should we change ourselves biologically to adjust or should we revert to a smaller scale of civilization?

Or is it just trying flailingly to mitigate the symptoms of the problem?
 
  • Autistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Axiom. and NoWayBro
Back