Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

Whatever Trump, good job trading away 50% of the voters for the 5% or whatever incels and MRAs make up (even though those were going to vote for you anyway), I guess everyone has a deplorable moment sometimes.
The rumor is that Trump wanted Bergum (which would be a safe pick) but his sons convinced him to pick Thiel's butt buddy. Not sure why.

It's been hilarious so far though. Incels hanging out on Discord servers with their brethren all day are convinced that everyone secretly thinks like them but just won't express it openly. But now they get to see how the public truly reacts on a national stage! And your boy's favorability ratings are a tire fire.
 
I really like this article and feel like it belongs in this thread.
The Patriarchal Illusion of Control
Ruinous drive for power and control primarily masculine
"We have long thought of ourselves as masters of the natural world, but now that drive to dominate and control is having dangerous consequences. Can we change the way we see our relationship with the other life forms on Earth?"

Now wait a minute. Does that description really apply to all of us? I suspect that most women, at least, find it hard to imagine ourselves as "masters" of very much, let alone masters of the natural world that we are all part of.
Edit to add quote this thing has a mind of its own lmao
 
In this house...

... And also we don't believe in science but accept the best interpretation of the data.
Love is love but leave the kids alone.
Etc, you get the idea.
Also, no soliciting.
1722063444985.png
You can get this one for $20, but they really gouge you on the shipping.
 
This might be genuinely one of the viler things I've read in this thread, and that says a lot. She needs to abort NOW, and if she doesn't, considering how much she says she's been drinking due to her depression and his sick fetish, she'll have a baby worthy of the Tard Baby General.

It's not just that he screams fucking a latex glove between two couch cushions ick, it's that he's absolutely fucking deranged too. Here he is saying that people with kids should get votes based on their kids. That's right, he wants Americans without kids to have votes considered of lesser value, have less of a voice, because people without kids "aren't invested in the future", As if childfree people won't also possibly live to be 80 years old or even older. I hope Trump genuinely regrets ever choosing this absolute fucking retard.
https://x.com/patrynard/status/1816183353772761538
https://archive.ph/PlAbI

View attachment 6236027
It’s a baffling stance from a logical perspective too. Boomers and Gen Xers had children (obviously) and they still voted (and keep voting) to destroy everything. Millennials have less children, but we still vote for these same imbeciles. Biden has children (and literally nothing else left to live for) yet he was still very eager to start a war in Europe, and fund the one in Israel, killing a hundred thousand of children. People do things that fuck the children over all the time.
 
IIRC MkultraGF is a Troon. Having sex segregated bathrooms in public isn't the same as your private residence. You're not accepting every stranger off the street into your home, are you? Better start letting the drug addicted homeless guy into your home, you libshit feminist.

Yeah, it's "big brain thinking." "But you have males at home sharing that space!" And you scream at me that I need to accept males in my spaces or else they'll get raped. Fucking handmaidens.
 
DEI: it definitely does happen, no denying that, but any woman in any high position isn’t automatically a DEI hire. It’s also why I want DEI done away with, it just hurts who it claims to help, like affirmative action
It's always funny how when a woman is working an industry that has a heavily male demographic, she's always the DEI hire or a diversity hire to push out a specific agenda because God forbid a woman actually being interested in a job that's usually associated with men, but when a man starts working in female-dominated job fields, he's such a hecking gigachad because "It's so hard to work a job associated with women as a man because you face discrimination and stigma if you're a man working these jobs!!1 🥺" and you MUST believe that a man working in a female job industry has good/well-meaningful intentions otherwise you're a discriminating misandrist.

There's something funny about men berating women for being uncomfortable with the idea of a male gynecologist, but then the very same men are also the ones throwing a temper tantrum and saying how DIVERSITY RUINS EVERYTHING!!!1 when they see a woman working engineering or technology related jobs.
 
Last edited:
And when it's more or less equal, it's bad too, you can't appease some kinds of men. Recently I've seen some old fart surgeon complaining that women are taking over medicine and more and more women are studying it, and that will cause the field ''lose its prestige''.
Like, wtf? As if waiting times for specialists weren't months here, as if there was enough dentists in smaller towns, as if people did not wait years for their creaky knees to be repaired. And as if the medical staff wasn't forced to do inhuman shifts.
And isn't the education system and its entrance exams the same for everyone? Doesn't it demand extraordinary discipline? Weren't its basics formed in the time female students weren't taken in account at all...? Don't even make me begin about why there used to be no female doctors in first place, but I suppose that was discussed here many times.
 
And isn't the education system and its entrance exams the same for everyone? Doesn't it demand extraordinary discipline? Weren't its basics formed in the time female students weren't taken in account at all...? Don't even make me begin about why there used to be no female doctors in first place, but I suppose that was discussed here many times.
Yeah it's one of the most merit-driven fields thanks to an obsession with standardized testing.

Funnily enough it's usually Pajeets complaining about women in medicine despite the fact that a lot of them don't really earn their way into practice by merit. Lots of Pajeets go to med school in Costa Rica or Poland (with Rajidaddy's money) because they can't get into a US med school and then match into some shitty Family Medicine residency.

If you ever see a doctor like that just run. None of them ever know what they're doing.
 
Having sex segregated bathrooms in public isn't the same as your private residence. You're not accepting every stranger off the street into your home, are you? Better start letting the drug addicted homeless guy into your home, you libshit feminist.
I think that's exactly what they're saying in the second paragraph, just through text-based sarcasm
 
It's always funny how when a woman is working an industry that has a heavily male demographic, she's always the DEI hire or a diversity hire to push out a specific agenda because God forbid a woman actually being interested in a job that's usually associated with men, but when a man starts working in female-dominated job fields, he's such a hecking gigachad because "It's so hard to work a job associated with women as a man because you face discrimination and stigma if you're a man working these jobs!!1 🥺" and you MUST believe that a man working in a female job industry has good/well-meaningful intentions otherwise you're a discriminating misandrist.

There's something funny about men berating women for being uncomfortable with the idea of a male gynecologist, but then the very same men are also the ones throwing a temper tantrum and saying how DIVERSITY RUINS EVERYTHING!!!1 when they see a woman working engineering or technology related jobs.
And when it's more or less equal, it's bad too, you can't appease some kinds of men. Recently I've seen some old fart surgeon complaining that women are taking over medicine and more and more women are studying it, and that will cause the field ''lose its prestige''.
Like, wtf? As if waiting times for specialists weren't months here, as if there was enough dentists in smaller towns, as if people did not wait years for their creaky knees to be repaired. And as if the medical staff wasn't forced to do inhuman shifts.
And isn't the education system and its entrance exams the same for everyone? Doesn't it demand extraordinary discipline? Weren't its basics formed in the time female students weren't taken in account at all...? Don't even make me begin about why there used to be no female doctors in first place, but I suppose that was discussed here many times.
Yeah it's one of the most merit-driven fields thanks to an obsession with standardized testing.

Funnily enough it's usually Pajeets complaining about women in medicine despite the fact that a lot of them don't really earn their way into practice by merit. Lots of Pajeets go to med school in Costa Rica or Poland (with Rajidaddy's money) because they can't get into a US med school and then match into some shitty Family Medicine residency.

If you ever see a doctor like that just run. None of them ever know what they're doing.
"Dee Eee Eye this" "Dee Eee Eye that"
The medical university score scandal in Tokyo (and maybe throughout Japan) still makes me seethe to this day. They deduced points from the exams of female students to keep the percentage of female doctors low and in some cases they lowered the bar for male students so more of them could get in over women. Shouldn't the outrage have burned the world down? From what I see, letting in the underqualified and unqualified into positions of power was the worst thing you can do, right? Diversity hires? What about homogeny hires? What about nepo and legacy hires?
 
This is a man hate post with a dash of mystery, and genuine spoilers:
Pinned by Zealous Beast
@ZealousBeast
5 months ago
Hey everyone, I just spoke with two of Wayne's daughters about his case, and I wanted to clarify some points which, in my opinion, potentially sway how a reasonable person would view the case. This isn't everything we talked about, but it's the distilled points that I can adequately state in a YT comment.
1. Saying that there were serious martial issues was an understatement. Things were very bad between Wayne and his wife, and he was in a position where hurting her emotionally/financially would have been appealing to him
2. Wayne was, at one point, having an affair with a woman in another state
3. To get where it was found, Wayne's car would have been driven right past his parents' ranch
4. Wayne's company was facing serious money issues, even before he disappeared
5. He once told a dock worker that he saw on occasion that he had brain cancer. There are no hospital records that they are aware of that would indicate this was true
6. The search dogs went from the car, over the embankment, and lost the scent at the road.
7. I don't want to put specific names in just a comment, but it's their feeling they know someone who would have helped him disappear by picking him up where he dumped his car
8. Wayne was learning Spanish at the time, which was purportedly out of his character
9. Wayne frequently talked about wanting to relocate to Australia
10. He was legally declared dead in either 2002 or 2003
 
Decided to clip Josh's recent rant on men, particularly terminally online /pol/tards who blame white women for everything.


Youtube penis bros aren't happy about this
1722123747518.png

"Man...Jersh used to be so based and gigachad when he constantly joked about white women fucking dogs, made fun of niggers, trannies and jews for being retarded (he still does that btw)...
But now when he said.. That politically obsessed men (aka me) that blame white women for everything and want to strip them off their rights are idiots and made
fun of me... That's to far.... He's so biased it's fucked up...Doesn't he know that women are the ones that initiate divorce..?"

1722124018971.png

Speaking of "women being the ones more likely to initiate divorce" fact men love to use as a gotcha to prove how women are vile creatures that revel in destroying things out of nowhere, I decided to do some research about this because despite constantly spouting this fact, men that never ask WHY is that.

Most of research and articles discussing this phenomenon mentions that one of the main reasons women tend to initiate divorces is because even in a more modern progressive society, women are still the ones that get to deal with domestic responsibilities such as cooking and cleaning even if they are working because men STILL consider these assignments as "women's jobs".
1722127662931.png
From here

1722127511888.png
From here


1722128206332.png1722128060746.png
From here

The phrase of "Single married parent" exists for a reason. There are also much more "simpler" explanations on why divorce is initiated due to infidelity and women choosing not to put up with it as they had to in previous generations.
1722128863225.png
1722128930978.png
From here

Also while reading this, another very interesting thing that comes up is that divorce is way more likely to happen if the woman is the breadwinner or earns more than her husband.
1722129214127.png
From here

There is also this more in-depth study into this phenomenon too.

It's almost like there's nuance in this whole topic, but instead of trying to understand it, it's just easier to say "WOMEN INITATE DIVORCE BECAUSE THEY WANT TO DIVORCE RAPE THEIR HUSBANDS AND MAKE THEM HOMELESS!!" because it makes them feel better about themselves and validates their view that men are poor dindu muffins stuck in a gynocentric world controlled by evil matriarchs that are just waiting to find an opportunity to screw them over.
 
Perhaps this is just the first time in history where something that was an unspoken truth is not only said out loud, but passed on via technological advances. In past times, maybe a certain group did something radical that slowly trickled down into shaping general views but we could not exchange ideas like this.

For the first time, women were able to openly communicate with each other across the world and all of them have been saying the same thing about men since the beginning of time. The extremely hard fact is: you will not all reproduce. But every culture in the past attempted to erode women's rights to push them into reproducing with shitty men who begat more shitty men and so on and so forth until we have our current day crisises across the board. The only way for women to contribute to saving civilization is by not reproducing with shitty men. It would be our moral duty and obligation to push away and ostracize every ineligible man until nature takes him away. If that means a portion of eligible women losing their valuable genetics, we will have to make that sacrifice for future women.

I've been dating for a few years now and have been on at least 25+ dates but have spoken to probably hundreds of men. Whenever I mention this it's always a me problem - I must swipe too much, I must only be interested in the top 10% of men, I must not be taking the matches seriously because one cannot imagine holding more than one conversation at a time despite the multi tasking women especially are known for.

When I first started freshly dating after my last relationship, I tried to be open to online dating advice - of which almost all of it is written by men either for men or to degrade a woman's self esteem so much that she will accept the first match she gets. I read that perhaps I was too picky, perhaps I had too many needs in a partner, perhaps I was too superficial and unwilling to give less attractive men a chance.

My typical rambling cut for size...

So I would be very casual about my swiping. I had a few hard preferences I will never change but otherwise, I'd swipe if they were basically white and under 300lbs. I was told by the advice columns I don't need to worry about having things in common, the right person will just click.

I will say the exposure I put myself through by listening to such advice is why I now hate men as much as I do. Even after a terrible abusive relationship I still believed that on average, men would be decent. Of course, I'd encounter the few that'll just send a dick pic but I'm sure that's what... 3 out of 40 guys?

On average, all men from all walks of life between the ages of 20-50 will be unable to hold a conversation that does not focus on himself. About 10% will offer to pay for a date and that 10% basically needs to offer as incentive because they otherwise have no personality, are obsessed with Warhammer or videos games or cars, are overweight to the point suggesting a walk is too much activity for them, will immediately espouse some extra right wing take that clearly red flags their distaste for women, will tell you that basically they want a partner to take care of them in exchange for them "loving them". Very few of these men ever have anyone entertain a conversation with them so if you do they will immediately simp extra hard about how you're so smart and they rarely talk to someone so smart and self aware meanwhile I've had this conversation 75 times this month with the exact same version of a man in various forms.

Since I've been on the apps so long, I also regularly get likes and matches from men I absolutely already spoke to and had negative experiences with and they don't even remember me. Just today I received a like from a man who previously called me a tranny when I mentioned his profile had no photos. The more a woman exposes herself to dating, the more she will be insulted on a regular basis, treated less than human, fighting off potential assaults and stalkers while paying for the privilege to have it happen to her. Even if a man is not "like other men" - the only way he will ever be successful is to fully acknowledge as Josh puts it, the dire situation women are in. He truly must prove he has the ability and fortitude to be a genuine protector of the family unit, not of his future assets. And that's not a job, in my world, as we have seen the richest men be the biggest scumbags. Simply providing money means nothing without the context of why it's provided - security, nourishment, luxury and the nuances of those things.

Otherwise he is a liability that no one needs around by nature of being a defective man. We should send such men to labor camps to extract some value from them as they leech oxygen from the planet before they inevitably die at 55 from those bad genetics. Especially if you want to remove abortion and divorce, as then we have more social security that the sex pests have been removed from the selection pool.

As a woman who was once stupid enough to listen to the bros - it's all men. Whatever 40% Josh refers to as eligible genetics - that's across 8 billion people. Essentially the number of non-potential rapists equals the population of China. As much as we'd like to talk about the Chinese take over, I only see maybe a dozen genuinely obvious Chinese people a month. And if you think about it, all the fucking Asians look Chinese so you can't even tell without cultural references if it's Chinese or Korean. So bad men can easily be disguised as the good men as well and Im supposed to find the single Chinese guy in my 100km radius? There might only be a couple thousand if I'm lucky and those guys might already be taken. So now I'm down to maybe a thousand I have to actively find and meet over a dozen some odd cities also before my own eggs shrivel up and I risk producing autists or worse. While working a full time job.

It is by far statistically easier to remain single as a woman in this era than any other era before. It is what our collective grandmothers gave to us and what we can maintain for our future collective daughters.
 
Back