US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
MATI moment, but I really cannot understand the normgroidcattle that say Biden was a great president, it's such a baffling thing to believe. What would they say in his defense when pushed? What the fuck has he done that's been beneficial? Or are they just constructing a regime-approved fiction wholecloth?

They're just told what to think. "Biden is the most consequential President of the modern era."

If you ever came across someone saying Biden is "good or "great" in real life. If pushed back, "But what about the wars?" You'd see them think for a second which is more than they'd thought about if that statement was true. Then repeat it and excuse Biden of any responsibility for anything. If you tried to explain why, basic facts and details. They'd be aware of nothing and treat indisputable facts with suspicion.

The same as any NPC is when you ask them basic questions or basic push back to the fake shit they believe.
 
Last edited:
American election poll autist here

Reminder that if you look at FOX's 2020 polling, they underestimated Trump massively everywhere. Fox News' polling operation is a joint effort from Beacon Research (Dem aligned) and Shaw&Company Research (NeverTrump R aligned). Add 5 to 10 points to Trump's numbers in Fox's polling to get a more accurate result.
 
View attachment 6246784

I'd forgotten about that moment.
The people who say JD Vance is weird:
  • Wore pink hats shaped like vaginas
  • Think men can get pregnant
  • Will rub elbows with Islamic terrorists who wouldn't hesitate to rape them and chuck them off of rooftops
  • Collectively cried about their Harry Potter tattoos when they heard JK Rowling say there are only two genders
  • Put a chick in every one of your favorite franchises and made her lame and gay
 
the context doesn't even make it any better. Yang was such a fucking meme
Obama wanted Biden to pick Yang as the VP nominee in 2020. I shit you not. It kinda makes sense to balance out the ultimate establishment candidate with a younger asian "non-establishment" candidate (put in quotes because Yang cowtowed to establishment narratives like the Russia Hoax)
 
They're just told what to think. "Biden is the most consequential President of the modern era."

If you ever came across someone saying this in real life. If pushed back, "But what about the wars?" You'd see them think for a second which is more than they'd thought about if that statement was true. Then repeat it and excuse Biden of any responsibility for anything. If you tried to explain why, basic facts and details. They'd be aware of nothing and treat indisputable facts with suspicion.

The same as any NPC is when you ask them basic questions or basic push back to the fake shit they believe.
When I asked one to describe progressivism and its benefits, they got big mad.

The truth is that conservatism is a valid view across time. We keep traditions and systems for a reason—they work. Progress for the sake of progress alone isn't progress. There are reasons for progress, but the consequences for society and the individual must be weighed carefully before proceeding. "Orange man bad!", "It's her turn!" or "They're going to put us in camps so I had my uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries removed!" ain't it.
 
When I asked one to describe progressivism and its benefits, they got big mad.

The truth is that conservatism is a valid view across time. We keep traditions and systems for a reason—they work. Progress for the sake of progress alone isn't progress. There are reasons for progress, but the consequences for society and the individual must be weighed carefully before proceeding. "Orange man bad!", "It's her turn!" or "They're going to put us in camps so I had my uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries removed!" ain't it.
Which is part of why the left pushes abortion and being childless - people who have natural born children tend to eventually start leaning conservative. There are exceptions which make up the trending X videos of retarded boomers saying they're all in for Kamala, but that's just them being boomers. Conservative principles such as doing something about crime, lowering taxes and improving living standards appeal to people with kids. The exceptions to this are single mom households who are dependent on the state for benefits and blacks who always vote for the most gibsmedat. So naturally, the left targets and encourages single parent homes.
 
Meanwhile...

Teacher’s Union Accused Of Laundering $1.5 Million To Bankroll Josh Shapiro’s Campaign

https://ijr.com/teachers-union-accused-of-laundering-1-5-million-to-bankroll-josh-shapiros-campaign/…

A watchdog group on Thursday accused a Pennsylvania teacher’s union of laundering $1.5 million to illegally fund Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s 2022 campaign.
The Freedom Foundation filed three complaints that allege the Pennsylvania State Education Association (PSEA) illegally laundered and sent $1.5 million to fund Shapiro’s campaign, according to a press release by Freedom Foundation.

The complaints were filed with various parties in Pennsylvania, including the FBI and IRS, as Shapiro has emerged as a contender to become Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate.
“PSEA’s scheme to secretly launder nearly $1.5 million in members’ dues through the Democratic Governors Association to support Josh Shapiro’s 2022 candidacy appears to have violated both an array of Pennsylvania laws and the Internal Revenue Code,” Freedom Foundation Director of Research and Government Affairs Maxford Nelsen said in the press release.

“In the process, PSEA executives displayed as much contempt for their own members as they did for Commonwealth law and voters. Pennsylvania teachers deserve to know that their union’s assurances that the dues deducted from their hard-earned paychecks aren’t being used to back political candidates are worth no more than a politician’s campaign promises.”
The Freedom Foundation alleges the PSEA sent $1.5 million to the PSEA-created Fund For Student Success (FSS) in May 2022, which in turn sent the same amount to the Democratic Governors Association (DGA), which then contributed $5.6 million to Shapiro’s campaign, according to the Freedom Foundation. They alleged the PSEA violated the PA Election Code and PA Public Employee Relations Act by using funds from union dues to contribute to a political campaign.

“The PSEA violated the prohibition in 43 P.S. § 1101.1701 against employee organizations using general treasury funds to ‘make any contribution… either directly or indirectly to any political party or organization or in support of any political candidate for public office’” the Foundation said in a complaint to the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board. The Foundation also alleged that the FSS failed to register as a political committee and filed fraudulent tax returns with the IRS that said the funds instead went to Put Pennsylvania First, a political committee, when the funds allegedly went to the DGA instead, according to the Foundation. They also alleged that the DGA failed to disclose the receipt of the funding from the FSS in May 2022. “Additionally, if DGA representatives knowingly submitted an incomplete report, they may have engaged in criminal perjury or written false statements in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 4902 and/or 4904,” the Foundation said in a complaint addressed to the Pennsylvania attorney general, the Dauphin County district attorney and the office of the secretary of Pennsylvania.
 

Attachments

  • 1722226461158.png
    1722226461158.png
    679.3 KB · Views: 3
Peak ClownMath: Fox News claims Kamala Harris leads 57% to 47%

I understand that polls use rounding, but what form of (((rounding))) is this??

View attachment 6246667
Considering the ballot stuffing that will be required for Kamala to win, I wouldn't be surprised if 104% of the registered population do actually end up voting.
 
Obama wanted Biden to pick Yang as the VP nominee in 2020. I shit you not. It kinda makes sense to balance out the ultimate establishment candidate with a younger asian "non-establishment" candidate (put in quotes because Yang cowtowed to establishment narratives like the Russia Hoax)
Yang would have worked if Biden hadn't shot himself in the foot by saying it would be a black woman as his VP.
 
How big of a shift are those numbers from previous election cycles?

I wager the second the left realizes the latinos won't be "niggers 2.0" no matter how badly they try to force them on the "latinx" plantation, it'll be the LEFT that suddenly wants mass deportations and a wall built. That'll be a funny week in politics.

Same thing with their pet sandniggers, too, but something tells me when it becomes undeniable that islam is not compatible with western culture and people make motions to stop/remove them, they'll have gotten too entrenched and start killing unbelievers rather than leave.


According to voting data from the Roper Center at Cornell, in 2016 Trump got 28% of Hispanics to vote for him while Hillary got 66%, Trump got 8% of blacks

In 2020, taking the data at face value and ignoring the cheating, Trump got 32% of Hispanics while Biden got 65%, Trump picked up 12% of blacks.

He was gathering momentum from both, he's still off from Nixon who managed to get 18% of black voters in '72. Ford came close with 16% against Carter. The best a Republican has done with Hispanics so far was Dubya when he was running against Kerry, he got 44% in that election.
 
Last edited:
Please redpill me on 2020 fraud. What's the most definitive proof and how can we prepare ourselves so that the Democratic Party doesn't do it again?
Overnight ballot counting without any neutral or Republican ballot watchers present.

The best way to guard against that is to have a camp out at every ballot counting location where it gets watched 24/7 until the vote is called.
 
American election poll autist here

Reminder that if you look at FOX's 2020 polling, they underestimated Trump massively everywhere. Fox News' polling operation is a joint effort from Beacon Research (Dem aligned) and Shaw&Company Research (NeverTrump R aligned). Add 5 to 10 points to Trump's numbers in Fox's polling to get a more accurate result.
Let them believe Trump will lose.

Then we get to have the wonderful party of 2016 all over again.
 
Please redpill me on 2020 fraud. What's the most definitive proof and how can we prepare ourselves so that the Democratic Party doesn't do it again?
Computer signature verification for mail-in ballots was shut off or the standards for a match were set so low as to be effectively nonexistent

Mail-in ballots were indiscriminately mixed and the envelopes destroyed so address and postmark verification couldn't be done

There's nothing you can do about it unless you have physical control of the machines and the ballots and envelopes in real time
 
Overnight ballot counting without any neutral or Republican ballot watchers present.

The best way to guard against that is to have a camp out at every ballot counting location where it gets watched 24/7 until the vote is called.
Yeah, the most important countermeasure against this is to ensure the poll watchers remain active and around. Do not let them kick anyone out.
 
Computer signature verification for mail-in ballots was shut off or the standards for a match were set so low as to be effectively nonexistent

Mail-in ballots were indiscriminately mixed and the envelopes destroyed so address and postmark verification couldn't be done

There's nothing you can do about it unless you have physical control of the machines and the ballots and envelopes in real time
dont forget that saying something about the process gives the ballot counters reason to boot you from the room
 
View attachment 6246963
Google scrubbed the assassination attempt so hard that Meta's AI has nothing to index
asked same question, got a different but just as retarded answer:
The availability and depth of information about a particular topic can depend on various factors, including:

  1. Media coverage: The extent and quality of media coverage can significantly impact the amount of information available. If a topic receives more extensive and in-depth coverage, more information will be available.
  2. Public interest: Topics that generate more public interest and engagement may lead to more information being created and shared.
  3. Source availability: The availability of credible sources, such as official records, witness accounts, and expert analysis, can impact the amount of information available.
  4. Time: Information about more recent events may be more readily available than older events.
  5. Censorship and moderation: In some cases, information may be removed or limited due to censorship, moderation, or legal considerations.

Regarding the Trump assassination attempt, there have been several reported incidents, but it's essential to specify which one you're referring to. If you're referring to the 2016 incident where a British man attempted to grab a police officer's gun to shoot Trump, there is indeed information available about this event.

However, if you're referring to a different incident, please provide more context or clarify which one you're interested in, and I'll do my best to provide more information.
so i asked it as a follow-up
i am interested in the assassination attempt on donald trump on july 13, 2024
and i got
I'm not aware of any credible information about an assassination attempt on Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. It's possible that you may have come across misinformation or unverified reports. If you could provide me with the source of this information, I'd be happy to help you fact-check it.

If an assassination attempt were to occur, it would likely receive widespread media coverage and official statements from authorities. I recommend checking reputable news sources and official channels for accurate and reliable information.

Please note that I'm a large language model, my training data only goes up to 2022-2023, so I might not have real-time information on very recent events. However, I can suggest some reputable news sources where you can find accurate information:
  • The New York Times ((link unavailable))
  • The Washington Post ((link unavailable))
  • CNN ((link unavailable))
  • BBC News ((link unavailable))
Let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!
holy shit lololololololol

so i say
and i get
Former US President Donald Trump was shot during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Trump, who was shot in the ear, was immediately taken for treatment at a local hospital and released later that day in stable condition. One attendee was killed and two others were injured, but survived. The shooter, later identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks, was shot and killed by the United States Secret Service shortly after the incident occurred. Investigations remain ongoing.
how retarded, anything after 2023 you have to feed it the information yourself to get a non-retarded response i guess?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back