Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Vibralldo]

Is Nick even trying to deny the swinger shit anymore?

I assumed he was on the "I did, but it's not like it's harmful, stop being prudes" phase of the Nick liar cope script by now

 

[AnOminous]

Yes and no. Its a question in the law of what "a reasonable expectation of privacy" is. A person who regularly engages in different forms of photography which are publically available on the internet may not have an expectation of privacy.

Even if you're an actual porn star, you don't waive the right to privacy in your own bedroom.

Is Nick even trying to deny the swinger shit anymore?

I assumed he was on the "I did, but it's not like it's harmful, stop being prudes" phase of the Nick liar cope script by now

There are no brakes on the Rekieta Lie Train.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

I think it goes to show a pattern of behavior that sharing nudes is not something you find offensive or unacceptable, its just a matter of who is sharing them now that you wish to punish. Not to mention Kayla's own words around that post that she's proud of her body and sees no problem with sharing that. It just comes off as blatant hypocrisy you can use to punish something you would have never otherwise. I would see a difference if you had never shared anything like that before and that happened to you vs. This scenario.

The way its written it is open ended enough to be used as such. There's also the nick and Kayla hedonism picture naked on the sign. That's more comparable. Is nick going to sue null next because the pictures were posted here too or is this just because he's mad at Aaron and he hopes he can't hire a competent defense attorney?

Television/Movies/Art/etc already delineate backshot from full frontal. There's also the argument that she had consented to those photos being released/posted them herself to where they could be seen by countless people whereas this photo was presumably only sent to a select few/possibly only Aaron.

Realistically, the court is almost always going to side with the woman in this scenario. Revenge porn laws are just that shit.

 

[AnOminous]

There's also the nick and Kayla hedonism picture naked on the sign. That's more comparable. Is nick going to sue null next because the pictures were posted here too or is this just because he's mad at Aaron and he hopes he can't hire a competent defense attorney?

You lose the expectation of privacy when you publish the material yourself.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

He might use it to try and get a harassment prevention order or restraining order that would effectively stop Aaron from mentioning her (and possibly Nick) in any future streams. It would also further discredit Aaron if he were to be used as a witness

Wouldn't that be tampering with a witness. Which is a crime?
Sounds like a dumb move.

Is Nick even trying to deny the swinger shit anymore?

During the Chrissie interview he did that "we are all friends" misdirection bullcrap. Where he denies without doing so.

@ 1:10:05 Rekieta: See people again [...] this is this is misconception thing [...] like, people believe that, uh, there's some sort of mistress thing going on and it's, like, we're all friends like Kayla and I are married and April is our friend. And our friend like, April and Kayla have their own friendship.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

Wouldn't that be tampering with a witness. Which is a crime?
Sounds like a dumb move.

If it's a proper police report and process probably not. It's somewhat akin to extortion vs demand letter.

 

[Train Operator]

Is Nick even trying to deny the swinger shit anymore?

he was on livestream with that one girl a few days ago saying it's weird how the internet assumes april is his mistress and reiterates that she's just their "friend".

if he's gonna deny swinging but go after Aaron for revenge porn that means he's gonna have to go the full cuck route and claim he wasn't fucking april but aaron was fucking kayla apparently. lol

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

I think it goes to show a pattern of behavior that sharing nudes is not something you find offensive or unacceptable, its just a matter of who is sharing them now that you wish to punish. Not to mention Kayla's own words around that post that she's proud of her body and sees no problem with sharing that. It just comes off as blatant hypocrisy you can use to punish something you would have never otherwise. I would see a difference if you had never shared anything like that before and that happened to you vs. This scenario.




The way its written it is open ended enough to be used as such. There's also the nick and Kayla hedonism picture naked on the sign. That's more comparable. Is nick going to sue null next because the pictures were posted here too or is this just because he's mad at Aaron and he hopes he can't hire a competent defense attorney?

He can't sue Null. He can (EDIT: Try to) get a DA to go after Null in MN with a felony charge (up to 3 years), after which said DA get slapped down by the feds since this is an obviously federal case (interstate jurisdiction) where the response is "off is the direction I want you to fuck".
For the record, 1A defense not withstanding the question is if Nick/Kayla are public figures:

(5) the image relates to a matter of public interest and dissemination serves a lawful public purpose;

Public interest: Public figure swinging allegations
Public purpose: To inform the INCEL PRUDE SCANDIAVIANS about hypocrisy.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

This fucking asshole is trying to compare the danger of having bleach in the house to transforming your house into a cocaine den.
This kind of disingenuous logic won't work with any reasonable person.

This stream has made me unironically MATI. His about-facing and attempts to rewrite history and warp reality are so damn frustrating.

Oh god... I think we have a match.

I can't believe we're footdoxing...Somebody call Fapcop.

 

[Drama keen]

I wouldn't be surprised if they try to throw Aaron under the bus. It's not like they treated him better when they (aggressively?) tried to get him to buy the house. He is just a useful idiot to them, it has seemed. And the --at least Nick's-- smart decisions keep on showing up, so, one more, won't hurt.

 

[Sharpeteer]

During the Chrissie interview he did that "we are all friends" misdirection bullcrap. Where he denies without doing so.

we're all friends like Kayla and I are married and April is our friend. And our friend like, April and Kayla have their own friendship.

This nigga is seriously still denying the swinger reality.

This excuse is almost as bad as the "I buy people drinks at clubs, and people think I'm a swinger" excuse he gave when on Sidescrollers.

What an absolute faggot. A terrible liar. You'd think he'd be better at it given his profession larping.

I wouldn't be surprised if they try to throw Aaron under the bus.

Dude, just send them all to Guantanamo Bay. They're all pieces of garbage that should spend the rest of their lives eating cock meat sandwiches in Hell.

 

[Strix454]

Wouldn't that be tampering with a witness. Which is a crime?

No. It would only become witness tampering if he used the situation (revenge porn) to influence potential testimony in the criminal case. Getting a restraining order and making a potential witness against you look like an idiot is not witness tampering. Witness tampering would tend to be threatening someone with a restraining order and indicating that you would drop the matter if they changed their testimony in another legal situation.

 

[Angry Shoes]

I posted this in the STMS thread but I'll post it here as well. If Nick reported Aaron for sharing revenge porn he's really painted himself into a corner. Nick is still claiming to be monogamous, but this guy somehow has nudes of his wife? Is he going to claim super-hacker Aaron Imholte somehow got access to Kayla's phone and stole them? What's his play going to be here?

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

They are still monogamous, Aaron just took some creepshots at their biweekly naked hot tub night. What? Do you Scandinavian prudes not do that?

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

I can't believe George soros would place nudes of our wife on Aaron's phone. Eeic July can't keep getting away with this.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

I can't believe we're footdoxing...Somebody call Fapcop.

Fapcop is down in Texas saving Elissa from the Rage Pig.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I have always suspected that Nick and Kayla are nudists at home. Nick has all but said so himself, talking about how he hates wearing clothes and avoids it if he can. From other anecdotes shared by Aaron, Kayla seemed to feel relaxed being naked most of the time. That towel on Nick’s office chair was also a giveaway to me; at nudist resorts, you’re expected to have a towel with you to place on any seat before you take it.

If you don’t do it around children, knock yourselves out. But the twisted messages it sends to kids — that lack of boundaries is fine, that access to their bodies is something to be freely shared with whoever is around, etc. — tend to fuck them up. So does creating an environment where the kids can’t have friends over because Mom and Dad are always naked. I know some adults who were raised in homes like this and all of them have shared how it fucked them up in various ways.

TL;DR Nick and Kayla to Gitmo, their kids to adults who will put their well-being first, even if it means not getting to indulge every degenerate urge at their whim.

 

[Maraschino]

I think you coined it yes, but Nick adopted it in his own terms for some reason. he used to say monogamous as fuck but I've heard him say the aggressively monogamous after it was brought up here.

Aggressively monogamous I'm fairly sure was during the struggle session with Nick screaming at Sean, or at least during the stream it occurred.

I have a question for anyone who was watching at the time I'm going to mention. I don't know if the content even exists anymore but what was the beef between Q and Drex the groomer?

It was a two-parter. Q (1) allegedly said suspect things about Kayla, and (2) Q had Drex on for a stream, which he then proceeded to "ambush" him by bringing on multiple women who decided to shit on Drexel's lifestyle, with Q's mom saying something about Drexel's mother failing to raise him properly. The first incident strained it, but the second fucked it completely.

 

[Captain Manning]

Is Nick even trying to deny the swinger shit anymore?

Unbelievably, yes.

Others have already posted it but, just so you know, April is just Nick and Kayla's "friend." Nothing more. We got it all wrong, and we're all retarded.

I assumed he was on the "I did, but it's not like it's harmful, stop being prudes" phase of the Nick liar cope script by now

You probably assume that because that is what a considerably more intelligent and considerably less egotistical person would do.

However, this is the Nick Rekieta thread, so...

It was a two-parter. Q (1) allegedly said suspect things about Kayla, and (2) Q had Drex on for a stream, which he then proceeded to "ambush" him by bringing on multiple women who decided to shit on Drexel's lifestyle, with Q's mom saying something about Drexel's mother failing to raise him properly. The first incident strained it, but the second fucked it completely.

Was Q wrong?

 

[Train Operator]

at nudist resorts, you’re expected to have a towel with you to place on any seat before you take it.

there something you wanna tell the class bro? lol