Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

Balldo's Gate said:
Was Rekieta lying when he claimed that Rekieta Law LLC was his job in 2021 or was he lying when he insisted that Rekieta Law LLC had nothing to do with his streaming business in relation to this case?
Click to expand...
I know you and Salt have beef, but this has literally nothing to do with what he was saying.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: John Andrews Stan
Balldo's Gate said:
Was Rekieta lying when he claimed that Rekieta Law LLC was his job in 2021 or was he lying when he insisted that Rekieta Law LLC had nothing to do with his streaming business in relation to this case?
Click to expand...
You're talking about legal conclusions, and either argument can be made. It'd only be if a court had made a decision that we'd even know which is correct or if they're simultaneously true.

It could even be that Rekieta Law LLC was one of his jobs in 2021 and it has nothing to do with his streaming business in relation to this case. They're not necessarily gong to be jointly liable if one is a subsidiary or if one of them "owned" the show and one of them "sponsored" it. It'd be up to the plaintiff to make his case for why he thinks Rekieta Law is a proper defendant.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: koos koets
Kosher Salt said:
You're talking about legal conclusions, and either argument can be made. It'd only be if a court had made a decision that we'd even know which is correct or if they're simultaneously true.

It could even be that Rekieta Law LLC was one of his jobs in 2021 and it has nothing to do with his streaming business in relation to this case. They're not necessarily gong to be jointly liable if one is a subsidiary or if one of them "owned" the show and one of them "sponsored" it. It'd be up to the plaintiff to make his case for why he thinks Rekieta Law is a proper defendant.
Click to expand...
Just a reminder, Rekieta Law LLC was terminated in February of 2023, I believe before the suit was filed. It dissolved just after the suit was filed (thanks @Useful_Mistake ). The LLC may have been in arrears at the point of the filing, but it was not terminated.
1721418920071.png
Rekieta Media LLC still exists and is active in Texas.

Edit: Fixed the status of RekietaLaw LLC on the filing of the suit.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: often puzzled, Third World Aristocrat, koos koets and 5 others
Useful_Mistake said:
this has literally nothing to do with what he was saying.
Click to expand...
What a bizarre statement.
I would recommend reading the previous page or two and maybe you will be able to figure out the context.

Dixieland Buckaroo said:
Just a reminder, Rekieta Law LLC was terminated in February of 2023, I believe before the suit was filed. It dissolved just after the suit was filed (thanks @Useful_Mistake ). The LLC may have been in arrears at the point of the filing, but it was not terminated.
Click to expand...
Which was apparently due to an "oversight", but that "oversight" has not been corrected despite more than a year to do it.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: John Andrews Stan and Useful_Mistake
AnOminous said:
I guess at the very least we'll figure out if Randazza is still on the case. I'm thinking yes.
Click to expand...
We all know that Nick only takes the best legal scholars in his fold. Therefore, we'll see a last minute announcement that he is represented by Russell "Hooker King" Greer
 
  • DRINK!
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat, Himedall All-seeing Waifu, koos koets and 8 others
Useful_Mistake said:
We all know that Nick only takes the best legal scholars in his fold. Therefore, we'll see a last minute announcement that he is represented by Russell "Hooker King" Greer
Click to expand...
"Your honor, I am changing my representation from Randazza to this man in a dried out blue baseball cap. His name is David Stebbins. And my legal defense is that he will stab you in the face if you don't dismiss the case"
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat, Long-time Lurker, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL and 7 others
Dixieland Buckaroo said:
I'm assuming since it was just a scheduling conference, nothing big happened unless there was a change of counsel.
Click to expand...
The issue is that there appears to be a pretty big problem with the scheduling.

According to the discovery plan both parties agreed to (according to Nick, without his knowledge or consent) BEFORE his no-hope appeal where he tried to convince the court of appeals to apply a law that's unconstitutional in Minnesota, the deadline for discovery is in two days.

discovery_deadline.png3
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminatus, often puzzled, DSP's Tax Lawyer and 10 others
Captain Manning said:
That's actually very nice of "judge pussy liquor." For once, Nick actually is really busy. Owing to both his CPS and criminal cases.
Click to expand...
Also his very busy schedule of incessantly sucking extremely melanated penises, every single day, into the foreseeable future.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Exterminatus, Third World Aristocrat, AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed and 5 others
Balldo's Gate said:
That does not mean the hearing was uneventful.
Click to expand...
I am gonna take wild-ass guess the moving the next hearing to November was made on the motion of Nick.

Unless Monty has something crazy going on in his side, I can't think of a reason why his side would want a delay.

I like to believe that Fischer was smiling inwardly when she set the next date. Fully aware of what Nick is going through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat and koos koets
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back