The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

Even then, they'll probably have to be careful because this is starting to look like the Brits don't want any foreigners in their country. Period.
The idea that we will remove all non-whites is about as realistic a man putting a wig on and becoming a woman.
It would be great to live in that utopia, but first things first, Islam must go.
 
Could a brit explain to this ignorant American how your class system works? The words make sense to me but in the US it is entirely based on income.
Probably equivalent to your upper middle class, your typical middle class jobs, over here make you between working class and middle class but not well off. Enough to support a family without your missus working but you're not thriving.
 
Could a brit explain to this ignorant American how your class system works? The words make sense to me but in the US it is entirely based on income.

This one is easy. To remind the immigrants the police cannot protect them if the natives are dead set on genociding them. Remind them they are not safe, and no amount of laws can stop a violent mob if the mob chooses to ignore them.

Mainly this encourages the darkies to emigrate on their own, or "self-deport" as we would say in the States.
Class has connotations of culture too, even in America.
You guys just seem to be blind to it.
Think about how the children of a small town doctor might be expected to behave, compared to trailer park kids.
"White Collar Professional" work is "middle class", "Blue Collar" laborers are "working class".
And if your family has a crest, and is or was at once point "landed" then you're aristiocracy, though there's precious few of those left - Think Antebellum South plantation owner; that's the closest thing there ever was to an American nobility in social position and culture.
 
You think starmer would be defending muzzies if they shit up his area?
You have no idea what you're talking about as usual. Do you think Starmer lives in a small village in wales or something?
Even then, they'll probably have to be careful because this is starting to look like the Brits don't want any foreigners in their country. Period.
That's exactly what is wanted. People trying to argue we should give our children a future where they have to fight for space because other ethnic groups still occupy it is disgusting. It's easy to understand and yet some people keep arguing for continued racial conflict for all eternity.

@Obstacle They are a threat but you deny it. A threat doesn't immediately jump out at you, it can be a long burn. Todays Sikhs might be peaceful and anti-islamic. But their children aren't them. Their childrens children aren't them. You might know a very nice Sikh man with nice kids. But what happens when they have 20 kids between them and now they all want their own home? How many homes are you willing to steal from the natives to give to foreigners? And what happens when those 20 kids have 2 kids each? What if they have 8? You're setting up another ethnic clash when space runs out again. And you're taking resources away from the natives to help foreigners.
 
Class has connotations of culture too, even in America.
You guys just seem to be blind to it.
Think about how the children of a small town doctor might be expected to behave, compared to trailer park kids.
Kind of.

You might find this article interesting. Mencius Moldbug is a pretentious wanker and I don't think his habit of making up his own weird jargon is all that helpful, but in this case specifically, it does add something. I still think American Nations by Woodard is the best way of explaining American internal conflict, but Moldbug captures how values do change from occupation to occupation.

A big point of it is that, for example, ghetto drug dealers and billionare football mandingos are the same class, they're both Dalits. A wealthy successful electrician or other tradesman and a factory assembly line worker are both Helots. A Brahmin could be an unemployed artiste or a millionaire cardiologist. It's about some shared sense of what is classy/cool in their culture.



Edit:
Brahmin's good time would be some faggy performance art thing, or a protest, or other bullshit.
Optimate's good time would be the same trash as a brahmin, but only if it's the c l a s s i c s.
Vaisya's good time would be having a beer at the bar with the guys from work or a barbecue on his lawn.
Helot's good time is the same as the vaisya's, but it's a million times louder and more chaotic and someone probably gets stabbed.
Dalit's good time would be smoking dope, having sex in public bathrooms with strangers and assaulting random White grandmas.

I'd have to reread in detail, but I disagree that Helots are all Mexican. One of the reasons I like Mexicans so much is that they remind me a lot of the more productive variety of crackers (people that are all, I think, helots or dalits). I disagree that people like rednecks have to be vaisya or dalit, being a redneck is itself almost a willful rejection of vaisya suburban normalfaggotry.
 
Last edited:
Could a brit explain to this ignorant American how your class system works? The words make sense to me but in the US it is entirely based on income.
Being an American who also has Brits in the family I feel uniquely suited to respond.

In America, your class is based entirely on utilitarian and egalitarian virtue. What you and your family provide to the community and in return what you obtain in financial compensation. Community recognition + money= class, in the USA. Which is why a very successful HVAC repairman/company owner would be considered "high class" in the USA. Especially if he uses his money to sponsor the high school football team and pays to have his company plastered on the billboard over the interstate exit leading to town.

In the UK, class is something you are born with. It is so innate in fact, that your social level can be instantly determined based solely on your accent. While the USA has mild regional accents, the UK has wildly different accents based on county and those accents further differentiate based on class. The ruling class is the only pan county spoken accent in England, and is the "English Accent" you hear in film and plays in America.

This means a successful and wealthy HVAC repairman/company owner, first generation would be considered lower middle class (tradesman). A step above the pissants who work for him (working class). If he's successful, he might be able to put his son through University in a prestige school and allow him to earn a position as a middle manager banker, or lawyer. Upper middle class. Maybe even take over the company, but as a CEO. Heaven forbid getting the hands dirty applying duct tape.

After that the Son may be able to afford to put his son though private education from grammar to University level, while ingratiating that son into high society networks. This third generation son if successful, and the the family wealth grown sufficiently through investing and nepotistic government positions/contracts, as to have left its dirty "tradesman" roots behind, will be considered "upper class".

Tl;Dr class in the UK is generational and you cannot rise up the ladder in your lifetime. You can only build the rungs in the ladder for your children.
 
Last edited:
You have no idea what you're talking about as usual. Do you think Starmer lives in a small village in wales or something?
He don't live in a fucking city pal. Where did the elites fuck off to during lockdown? Was it the city centre of liverpool or brum? No, they fucked off to their hidey-hole holiday homes in the cotswolds and quaint villages.
 
Back-track harder faggot. It's been really, really, really fucking bad since the 80s. It's just been ignored because the problems were in the inner cities of the north, where rampant unemployment happened after the miners strikes. They were flooded with pakis as a fuck you for disobeying the government.

Who gives a fuck about the Germans? The same people who cheered on millions of muslims flooding to Europe while fucking every other country on the continent. We should have left them to the Russians.

What part of Britain are you from?
This is getting gayer and more retarded by the post. I'm not gonna be dragged into some 20-page retard fight with you, so this is my last reply. Considering that the percentage of nonwhites in the UK was less than 10% before the 2000s, I'd say that things got significantly worse across the entire west over the last 20 years. You are a retard for zeroing in on this.

The Arabs and Pakis see no meaningful difference from you, me, and a German, you fucking retard. Put all three of us next to a Paki and suddenly we'll start to seem a hell of a lot more similar, assuming you're actually a white Brit, which I'm doubting. You could say the same sort of shit about Britain with how many leftoid faggots welcomed the niggers in as well. You are a faggot.

I've already stated I'm a Yank and that 3/4ths of the lines in my family tree came from England, Ireland, and Scotland, feel free to violently shit and piss your pants about that like the subhuman mouth-breathing retard you are, shitting yourself in anger because I just stated a physical fact about reality. Do not fucking give me any retard bullshit about me not being in a position to comment on Britain when Brits comment on America all the time, you diesel-huffing silly-putty-for-brains mongoloid.
 
I get the impression, time and time again, that Sikhs are kind of the master race around those points (like Persians are relative to Arabs and Turks). Probably a consequence of being Aryans and monotheists.

In fact, Koreans that you mentioned, they're mostly Christians. Methodists.
thanks for the compliment about the persians. All sikhs I have known have been buisness owners who largely kept to themselves.
 
The UK army can 'maybe' deploy a division of combat ready infantry, assuming there isn't a mass mutiny and refusal of orders. That's enough to hold one smallish city if things get really bad.
that sounds like the worst possible idea in this kind of situation. you get 1 trigger happy soldier to shot and kill a Pro-British protester and you'll see shit go to hell real fast.

I'm not well informed on the quality of the men in the English military but hopefully they're more patriotic and aren't outright traitors to their country and people like 90% of the """british""" police seem to be.
 
He don't live in a fucking city pal. Where did the elites fuck off to during lockdown? Was it the city centre of liverpool or brum? No, they fucked off to their hidey-hole holiday homes in the cotswolds and quaint villages.
Starmer is an atheist; he chooses to take a "solemn affirmation" (rather than an oath) of allegiance to the monarch.[202] He has said that although he does not believe in God, he recognises the power of faith to bring people together.[203] He also accompanies his family to services at the Liberal Jewish Synagogue in London.[200][204] Starmer is a keen footballer, having played for Homerton Academicals, a north London amateur team.[10] He supports the Premier League side Arsenal.[6]

The guy who plays for London football teams and goes to a London Syangogue clearly lives in a small sleepy village.

Just stop. You're looking retarded.
 
You have no idea what you're talking about as usual. Do you think Starmer lives in a small village in wales or something?

That's exactly what is wanted. People trying to argue we should give our children a future where they have to fight for space because other ethnic groups still occupy it is disgusting. It's easy to understand and yet some people keep arguing for continued racial conflict for all eternity.

@Obstacle They are a threat but you deny it. A threat doesn't immediately jump out at you, it can be a long burn. Todays Sikhs might be peaceful and anti-islamic. But their children aren't them. Their childrens children aren't them. You might know a very nice Sikh man with nice kids. But what happens when they have 20 kids between them and now they all want their own home? How many homes are you willing to steal from the natives to give to foreigners? And what happens when those 20 kids have 2 kids each? What if they have 8? You're setting up another ethnic clash when space runs out again. And you're taking resources away from the natives to help foreigners.

Cool your tits, my Aryanigger, I know precisely one area that's got an overwhelming preponderance of Sikhs, and that's Smethwick.
As a white cunt I've walked through the whole thing in the dead of night, and frankly, though it's a bit more dilapidated than a white area, it really is leaps and bounds better than the zones of Birmingham inhabited by Blacks (Like Ladywood) or Pakis (Sparkhill, Alum Rock).
I mean, you can disagree with me, I can disagree with you, about what must be done with each and every foreigner.
But right now, right here, today, they're the least likely people to raise a finger to help a Muslim, especially since Muslims particularly target them, as their religion's origin story basically revolves entirely around killing preposterous amounts of Muslims.
Frankly, I can only respect that.
There have been no reports of Sikh grooming gangs, because unlike Muslims, they seem to take their vows of chastity quite seriously.
They aren't -supposed- to drink, but they do.
I once walked into a pub in Halesowen, and found a room full of Sikhs windmilling their beards to Black Sabbath; these people are just categorically, not the same sort of creature.
 
There have been no reports of Sikh grooming gangs, because unlike Muslims, they seem to take their vows of chastity quite seriously.
They aren't -supposed- to drink, but they do.
These clash with each other. If they take their vows seriously they shouldn't be drinking. I've had problems with sikhs in my area in the past, so I'm not buying their all good boys who dindu nuffin. They use many of the same tactics to land grab and bully others out of their territory. It's not an exclusively Muslim or Jewish thing.

You can respect other cultures and not want that culture in your lands. Enoch Powell loved India, he spent a lot of time there and thought it was fantastic. But he didn't want the UK to be India. I'm happy to co exist with any people living outside of my borders. I just don't want to set my grand kids up for ethnic conflict I've had to live with my entire life. I want a better future and that means the country must be their country, not carved up by different ethnic groups.
 

Imagine waking up every morning knowing you are a fucking British police officer. Earlier on in the day, in the same place some muslim guy was literally screaming "We're gonna kill you all!" to the English in front of the police. And he didn't even get a verbal warning.
The old fellah comes across as a total normie. UK policing has always been focused on protecting the establishment and repressing the native working class, dealing with crime is not even on the list.


An analysis of unsolved crimes in Britain has revealed that Britain’s biggest force is failing to tackle a range of offences, while brazen criminals say they do not fear the police.

Channel 4 Dispatches found 167 areas across England and Wales where the police had not identified a single suspect for neighbourhood crimes between 2021 and 2023. All but one of them were in the Met’s area, in London.

"Petty crimes" include burglary, muggings. vehicle theft and non weapon assaults. For people with means having your phone stolen or your house broken into and all your stuff nicked is an inconvenience for the poor it's a life changing calamity. I can only think that the deliberate refusal to even try to deal with crime is motivated by keeping police interactions to a minimum with the groups committing 99% of it (niggers and muslims) plus an active hate for the main victims, poor white people.
 
These clash with each other. If they take their vows seriously they shouldn't be drinking. I've had problems with sikhs in my area in the past, so I'm not buying their all good boys who dindu nuffin. They use many of the same tactics to land grab and bully others out of their territory. It's not an exclusively Muslim or Jewish thing.

You can respect other cultures and not want that culture in your lands. Enoch Powell loved India, he spent a lot of time there and thought it was fantastic. But he didn't want the UK to be India. I'm happy to co exist with any people living outside of my borders. I just don't want to set my grand kids up for ethnic conflict I've had to live with my entire life. I want a better future and that means the country must be their country, not carved up by different ethnic groups.
Hey, everybody's a hypocrite on some level, and their moratorium on alcohol is hardly unique; shit, there are Muslim countries that are famous for their spirits; Turkish Raki for instance.
And frankly, I don't trust a man who won't drink with me anyway.
Enoch was too good for us; we didn't deserve him.
Your explanation that you've had barney with Sikhs makes your attitude more understandable.
Of course not everybody's experience with them is gonna be as rosy as mine.
However, your experiences with them are markedly more anomalous than bad experiences with Muslims, which are basically ubiquitous to everybody at this point.
If at some point in the future, the Sikh population starts acting out, then by all means, fight 'em.
Your duty is to your own people first and foremost.
However.
For the vast majority of people in England, Sikhs are not an existential threat, and your barney with them was likely more personal than anything else, am I correct to assume?
 
Back