- Joined
- Jul 11, 2024
What a shame, mi amigo thats the most fun thing you can do on the shartyAs long as you guys don't attempt remote access controlling public systems
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a shame, mi amigo thats the most fun thing you can do on the shartyAs long as you guys don't attempt remote access controlling public systems
crosspost from lazerpig thread again, kiwifarms taking the blame for the nemlei doxx KEK
View attachment 6279285
at this point we might as well falseflag saying it was reddit or ifunny

this happened last decemberThe Sharty has been excluded from the Wayback Machine. Other sites, like the 'ki, the 'ru, the shlog, and the splinters, are still available:
A Daily Dot journoscum included a Sharty archive link in an article that came out on July 12th: https://www.dailydot.com/memes/soyjak-meme/this happened last december
You guys can be pretty funny with the soyjaks sometimes. I'll throw the sharty a bone and say it's a lot better than the state of 4chan after 2014. 'Cept of course jannies. Jannies are almost always stunning in terms of how gay they can be.
You guys can be pretty funny with the soyjaks sometimes. I'll throw the sharty a bone and say it's a lot better than the state of 4chan after 2014. 'Cept of course jannies. Jannies are almost always stunning in terms of how gay they can be.
does that mean science approves of soyjaks and they can finally be added to wikipedia properly?A Daily Dot journoscum included a Sharty archive link in an article that came out on July 12th: https://www.dailydot.com/memes/soyjak-meme/
The Sharty is mentioned in Wikipedia's article on imageboards (that's how I found this article), so it's probably not that far off.does that mean science approves of soyjaks and they can finally be added to wikipedia properly?
you need multiple sources and not just one in order to make an article. so more sources need to know about the sharty before wiki jannies decide it's good enough for an article. Also, the Daily Dot itself isn't considered reliable nor unreliable by Wikipedia jannies.does that mean science approves of soyjaks and they can finally be added to wikipedia properly?
where's snopes when we need him...you need multiple sources and not just one in order to make an article. so more sources need to know about the sharty before wiki jannies decide it's good enough for an article. Also, the Daily Dot itself isn't considered reliable nor unreliable by Wikipedia jannies.
Good. I hope the Sharty dies.I'd prefer if there wasn't a wikipedia article on the sharty because if some random X troon can get the domain taken down with just one tweet, the sharty won't stand a chance against a typical journoscum especially if window lickers like Froot are at the helm.
i don't think i could see anybody on the sharty being capable of doing something newsworthy enough to warrant multiple articles done on them, or even just one for that matter.I'd prefer if there wasn't a wikipedia article on the sharty because if some random X troon can get the domain taken down with just one tweet, the sharty won't stand a chance against a typical journoscum especially if window lickers like Froot are at the helm.
its still fucking retardedeven doe this has been happening to me for the past week
Not unless another stunning and brave black tranx qween shoots up another walmart in the name of McDonalds, Hitler and hwitey.i don't think i could see anybody on the sharty being capable of doing something newsworthy enough to warrant multiple articles done on them, or even just one for that matter.
Tbh, you just need one youtuber to make a video essay on the gay pedo website that is known as the harty. And then you'll get journo hacks who'll make "The new 4chan is scarier than anybody could have thought." At this point I really wish the sharty dies in obscurity and that the average poster feels ASHAMED for posting on it regularly.i don't think i could see anybody on the sharty being capable of doing something newsworthy enough to warrant multiple articles done on them, or even just one for that matter.
Obsessed o algo.Tbh, you just need one youtuber to make a video essay on the gay pedo website that is known as the harty. And then you'll get journo hacks who'll make "The new 4chan is scarier than anybody could have thought." At this point I really wish the sharty dies in obscurity and that the average poster feels ASHAMED for posting on it regularly.
I cannot look like both of them. You are clearly schizophrenic and demented if you think a gray scale gigachad and a fat bearded man are taking turns writing out my posts.>Tbh, you just need one youtuber to make a video essay on the gay pedo website that is known as the harty. And then you'll get journo hacks who'll make "The new 4chan is scarier than anybody could have thought." At this point I really wish the sharty dies in obscurity
View attachment 6282275
>and that the average poster feels ASHAMED for posting on it regularly.
View attachment 6282277