Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 157 40.6%

  • Total voters
    387
"You need to prove I did X and you can't prove I did X" is the game he's been playing with the Farms for several years now. It's working on some people, it seems.
It works on people like Coomalot because Coomalot is a dumb redneck.

Well that, and also, nobody gives a shit about Gamestop anymore, and he's gotta do something when he isn't creeping on vtubers and trying not to crash his race car.

Just in case there's anybody here that hasn't figured that out yet.

Court Records about his drug test says otherwise. He is bald faced lying to you Camelot. Nick likes you because you actually believe his lies.
Exactly. See above. Nick did not piss clean for alcohol. He still drinks like a fish. At best, he's demonstrated just enough self control to not seem as sloshed on camera.

Stuff like that is why Nick needs to kneecap MPR. Hopefully he didn't succeed in getting the files sealed, but even if he did it's already to where the man has zero credibility when it comes to him accurately relating what's going on.
 
-- There was zero evidence to prove that Nick used drugs.
-- There was zero evidence to prove that his kids were ever exposed.
-- And no one willing to testify in any way opposing those facts.
Wasn't Aaron willing to testify about all this? He was sure full of piss and vinegar about coke bullets and bathroom blow.
 
So Camelot is streaming and sez:

- Nick's big win is "getting his kids back"
- Nick told Camelot his case (the family one) is all but over because:
-- There was zero evidence to prove that Nick used drugs.
-- There was zero evidence to prove that his kids were ever exposed.
-- And no one willing to testify in any way opposing those facts.

This is Nick's typical mix of truth and falsehood. Words carefully selected to either say nothing or to give an entirely false impression of what happened. If he had beat the warrant, he would have bragged about beating the warrant. But instead of doing that, he goes back to the familiar swerve that "you need to prove I did drugs and you can't prove I did drugs". Which really has nothing to do with anything. Its simply Nick's version of the Chewbacca defense.

The most likely outcome here is that the grandparents completed the drug recognition training, Nick stayed sober by testing and the grandparents moved into Nick's house. If the CPS process were over, Nick would have used different words.
I swear to god camelot himself said that he was there when Nick would buy whores
 
If Rekieta's main concern about not releasing the body cam footage was:

"It'll make me look bad for my CPS case and I won't get my kids back you kiwi fags." :really:

🎉 That's no longer a concern! 🎉

There's no reason for him not to sign the release for the body cam footage!

I'm sure he'll sign that release any hour now.

He will never do this, I know, I know. He's a disingenuous liar.
 
I'm guessing.... I'm betting....likely

You continue to make unfounded and wild assertions without the decency or care to label them as speculation.

I didn't think predicting they were working on a plea deal that involved deferred adjudication for a first time non-violent drug crime was that wild or unfounded. I try to make it clear it's opinion. you quoted a piece that start's with "I'm guessing."

I'm curious as to what has created this impression. I've always thought Nick would be offered deferred adjudication. Was it my opinion that Nick and Kayla were offered identical plea deals for the same crime and evidence? If I wasn't clear, hears what I think happened

1. Nick's attorney begins plea negotiations on behalf of Nick.
2. They reach an agreement for Nick last week (probably when Nick said his case was moving along nicely).
3. Prosecutor commits the deal in writing.
4. Prosecutor offers identical deal to Kayla. Kayla doesn't have atty so it has to be served.

I think that's infinitely more plausible than Kayla being offered a random plea agreement independent of Nick. I also don't think that Nick's revelation today about kids returning is independent of his crim case. It fits that his his atty, during plea negotiations with prosecutor overseeing both child and crim cases would resolve everything. That would be a logical objective for both defense and prosecution. What is wild or unfounded about that?
 
except for, you know, all the cocaine in the 8 year olds hair. lol

No. Nick said that there was no proof of exposure. Her hair was proved to have contained cocaine metabolites, but as Nick has said how that happened is a complete mystery to him. No witnesses came forward in court to testify that the daughter had been exposed to cocaine. There is no evidence of any sort to show that she was ever exposed.

Nick always tells the truth. Even when he is lying.
 
Wasn't Aaron willing to testify about all this? He was sure full of piss and vinegar about coke bullets and bathroom blow.
He's on the official witness list in the criminal case. I do not know if he was in play for the CPS shit.

You are also just taking at face value the claim nobody was willing to testify at the CPS hearing about what went on in the house. Don't do that. That comes from Nick the liar via Coomalot the redneck dumbass.

Again, I think what happened is they are conditionally giving the kids back. I do not think they want to keep the kids, and as long as Nick will agree to certain conditions, they're fine with it and they don't need or want a full adversarial process.
 
Last edited:
Your "boy" was basically done with your mongoloid ass until you started running your mouth after his arrest, and he had to make sure you were still loyal to the balldo. That's why you're such great pals again. To make sure you keep your white trash trap shut except to repeat Nick's retarded narrative like the mindless stooge you are.

Late, but what's the story of "heartfelt"? Was that the precursor to "wish you a million dollars."
It's what Jack Murphy said to Sydney Watson when he chimped out over that superchat.
"Fuck you, heartfelt!"

EDIT: It just hit me that even Jack "69 for 69" Murphy had the balls to tell someone to go fuck themselves (even if it was a skinny Australian woman lmao.) The faggot who got pegged on camera has more of a spine than Nick Rekieta.
 
Last edited:
Oh God.

Nick is going to get probation.
1684633719208795.jpg
 
That's so cute that he thinks that his totally not drugged up hyper friend tells him not only everything, but that it is also sourced from the whole truth. Amazing.

Though I tend to agree with @Captain Manning that it's more likely Mr. Misallot is trying to boost his own unsatisfactory numbers. He's still holding onto his remaining Rekieta's shares that he bought at their highest point hoping they'll still be worth millions one day.
 
I didn't think predicting they were working on a plea deal that involved deferred adjudication for a first time non-violent drug crime was that wild or unfounded.
It's not that part, retard, it's all the other shit about Kayla secretly and unethically being represented by Nick or his attorney or the shit about April being out of the house or literally EVERYTHING BESIDES THE DEFERRED ADJUDICATION.
 
Back