Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 152 40.2%

  • Total voters
    378
Ya think?

It's an uphill battle to argue there existed no probable cause when the cops find the very items that they were looking to find as described in the warrant.

What? Did they just make a super fucking lucky guess there was dope at Casa de Balldo?

The first step in defense for a client is to avoid having to defend anything - i.e. have all the results of the search deemed invalid. And, it has happened where a guilty client - even murderers, drug king pins and rapists - were unable to be prosecuted because the probable cause of the search warrant that obtained the evidence was deemed unacceptable with errors or based on grounds that did not pass muster.

For Nick, there will be no accepting anything as fate, a plea or a given until he has extinguished any and all avenues to have the search warrant deemed invalid. Given that they knew he was a lawyer and had some weight and wasn't a regular Joe, they likely ensured the Search Warrant was airtight and on point as other more informed and better educated KFers have pointed out. If it is made invalid, they've got nothing on him and this entire episode is pretty much over for him.

I do look forward to Nick's disappointment in this, that in itself, will make a fine moment as that candle of hope is extinguished. Bookmark that day because the clouds and doom of reality will fill his skies.
 
I remember someone comparing Barnes to Baby Herman from Who Framed Roger Rabbit, it was either on here or Kino Casino. But he really does look like him and the cigar makes it funnier.

Cigar 2.jpeg
 
Nick, do you unironically think I am a pedophile?

Need I remind you of my interests? I have no doubt in my mind I could convince a judge and jury that I like what I like.

I would post my latest piece here but that's a guaranteed ban. (:_(
My dude Nick has PTSD flashbacks every time he sees your name. He stopped reading as soon as he saw it and dropped to the floor burbling "animesuckscopeandsneed" x10.
He's
seeing obese pink farting dragons right now.
 
Because the entire cast of Eva are insufferable cunts. It might be the least likeable cast of characters in television history
I was going to say "Isn't EVA just "insufferable cunts" the anime?" Glad to see I'm not alone.

edit: punctuation
Oh, come on! Even PenPen? PenPen did nothing wrong!

Nick, do you unironically think I am a pedophile?

Need I remind you of my interests? I have no doubt in my mind I could convince a judge and jury that I like what I like.

I would post my latest piece here but that's a guaranteed ban. (:_(
It would be funny if the image he looked at that night were introduced into evidence.

"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my client Nick Rekieta was not under the influence of the obviously planted coke that night. That is a vicious lie! That was powdered sugar on his nose, and his behavior that night was attributable to him being sent... THIS!"

*Audible gasps from the courtroom*
 
BTW, am I just crazy, or did the Balldoguards in Sean's chat the other night seem more organized than usual?
You are not crazy, it has been seen. Many have borne witness to the current crop of BalldoGuards trying to paint a picture of “winning” because this pathetic purpneck creature, Nick Rekieta, who abused drugs & liquor to the point that his children were confiscated from his unsafe home, has finally “resolved” the problem of his children’s safety. No one is seething, people seem to be seeing exactly what was predicted. But Nick has a little whack pack of faggots trying to make this entire thing into some big game or something. Something Nick (& by default, themselves,) can win. That’s not how living works, as most people know. Even Kiwi Incel Prudes.

Nick has a wild pack of faggots just juicing him up so hard that he thought it’d be a cool idea to livestream while clearly intoxicated, again, on the alleged first night the kids were allowed home, (very possibly under specific orders from Kandiyohi County child welfare authorities still,) to seethe & accuse the owner of an Internet gossip site for his own self inflicted misfortune. It makes no sense, there is no win. There are a handful of middle aged has-beens around him whispering in his ears how he’s “winning” though. What he’s winning is unclear. It’s an ouroboros of insanity that no one but Nick (& his biggest cheerleaders who helped come up with whatever it is) could ever understand. Do yew Undahstahnd!?
My artistic interpretation of the Rekieta's arrest.

View attachment 6293591
Now I’m trying to remember the “I’m the one who knocks,” thing. Anyone remember? I recall Nick interjecting “I’m the one who mounts” directly after his arrest when Aaron told the world about the swinging. That type of statement is very typical for peacocking Nick. He’s winning, he’s the one who knocks, man. Great job on the artistic depiction.
 
LOVE EWU crew but it's pretty insane there was a while where the host would tell the audience his name was 'the raven'
Refresh my memory: Is EWU the father-daughter abandoned places thing? The daughter is kinda hot? I think I may have seen a few of their videos a while ago. Are they doing tru-crime now or something? Seems odd they would be interested in Nick from what I remember seeing from them.

Pen² is a dickhead every time he’s on screen. He didn’t even clap in the end. And it makes sense. He’s the novelty pet of a BPD alcoholic woman
Okay fine. You win. They all suck.
 
Barnes and Frei outright accusing Officer Pomplun specifically of conspiring against Rekieta to protect their corrupt small town.
Since he was the one who wrote the application, it's clear they are talking about him throughout when they discuss the alleged bias of the person who wrote it, but I will include this for completeness from around 28 minutes of the "Breaking down the Rekieta application for a search warrant" stream where they name him by his initials (QP) specifically so there really is no doubt.

https://www.youtube.com/live/UEHqZJqHBeA?t=1598

 
The strategy of plausible deniability is retarded. I don't need to see images of his house to know what a crack den with 5 neglected kids and 4 drug addicted perverts looks like. We all know 90% of happened at the Rekieta's the last year or so. Nick, Kayla and the Imholte's are just mentally ill junkies into swinging.

What annoys me is his smug attitude. Nigga you ain't won shit, even if you manage to get away scot-free, you've completely destroyed your life. Everyone you know, family, friends, the church, the whole Internet, knows you are a drug addicted child neglecting pos. They know that sweet Kayla has had a train ran on her by half of Jamaica.
 
There's actually a pretty big difference, in that you generally actually need probable cause even to engage in physical surveillance.
I'm talking about passive surveillance. A cop can watch you on a public street without a warrant. A cop can watch you on a public livestream without a warrant. Neither is like phone tapping, or otherwise invasive surveillance.
Incorrect

Not anymore

Government Agents Routinely Entering Private Land Without Warrants​


While most Americans might understandably believe the Fourth Amendment’s protection against warrantless searches covers all their property, a little-known 1924 Supreme Court decision -- Hester v United States -- says otherwise.

 
Barnes keeps insisting that Rekieta is being targeted by the local government because he has been an "outspoken critic" of the "corruption" of the local justice system.

Has Rekieta ever seriously criticized or complained about Candyass County in any significant capacity before now? I have zero memory of this.
As @Himedall All-seeing Waifu reminded me the other day, there's the Fischer elevator story. Some perfectly reasonable people (like Sean and @AnOminous) believe that Fischer may have been out of line during the events leading up to that. Assuming Nick's story is true (which is a huge if in his case).

However, the procedure there would be to object in open court, or otherwise handle it professionally through official channels. Not bitch her out in an elevator and then bitch about it on one of his livestreams.

Other that though, I can't really think of anything.

Barnes is massively overplaying that angle to the point of absurdity. Nick is not some fearless exposer of local government corruption. That's bullshit.
 
You are not crazy, it has been seen. Many have borne witness to the current crop of BalldoGuards trying to paint a picture of “winning” because this pathetic purpneck creature, Nick Rekieta, who abused drugs & liquor to the point that his children were confiscated from his unsafe home, has finally “resolved” the problem of his children’s safety.
If anything, he's been made more popular with some folk thanks to his new caught-a-felony status. That means when he's being a family man, he's being based! And he's doing it while middle fingering the system. What a national treasure.
 
Back