US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[FrancineCansMcGee]

A longer version of Vance destroying CNN's Dana Bash, it is simple and destructive and becomes more the interviewer than the gay host, this dude really has been showing he's the heir to MAGA:

View attachment 6295894
View attachment 6295893


He's also going on ABC and slapping them around, total blackpiller death:

View attachment 6295896

View attachment 6295899

Very interesting that he is referring to "The Harris Administration" as the present leadership.

 

[GettrGriftr]

Close. You don't go through ASCAP or BMI or SESAC (you forgot them) to license. You go through the Harry Fox agency to get the license for mechanicals or sync, etc. Then ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC all collect the royalties for you.

I stand clarified. Although my description of the mechanics was off, my main point stands: Shit-lib musical acts that go off on a foot-stamping temper tantrum whenever a politician they don't like uses their recordings at political rallies and act like they have some sort of über-veto power against said politicians need to shut the fuck up and just cash their royalty checks.

 

[Jade Philosophies]

I have never before now heard the term "popularism" as some distinction from "populism" rather than just a misspelling; and even did a cursory search online to see if it was a known term and didn't find anything. In fact, most things redirect to populism and the only thing I could find is an Italian form of socialism of that name (give or take some anglicization). And your article seems to be a new definition again distinct from the Italian doctrine coined by an academic a few years ago. I don't recognise it as a generally accepted political term and I think you also seem to be taking it rather at face value as saying it is sincere in contrast to populism. Populism is picking political platforms that put forward the common people's interests ahead of the elites. Whether those doing so are sincere or not is a separate axis.

Perhaps I am just the uninformed one but given that your linked article explicitly refers to "popularism" as "Shor's" idea which is again distinct from the Italian translation of another political doctrine again, and that Shor seems to be doing so in 2021, I don't think it has the weight of acceptance. And I'm quite sure @autistic dog wasn't confusing the two!

And all this is coming from me who quite frequently has to correct people confusing corporatism and corpocracy. Irregardless still isn't a word, btw.

Maybe it's a British thing? (I'm English.) I heard people making the distinction years ago. IRL, either pre-WWW or at least before the web became truly mainstream. I didn't understand why you said irregardless isn't a word so I looked it up and some people just consider it incorrect grammar. I'll just use regardless in the future. I don't know why I didn't really. There must have just been a lot of use of the word "irregardless" lately and it got stuck in my head.

 

[Morethanabitfoolish]

Kama-Kama-Kama-Kamaleon...

They cum you go, they cum you go!

Crude joke to make about her but not unfair.

 

[Dagoth AMOGUS]

Should there be a new banner? Biden is basically out of the picture now. Not to mention that one we have now is……creepy

 

[God of Nothing]

Should there be a new banner? Biden is basically out of the picture now. Not to mention that one we have now is……creepy

when was the last time he made a public appearance?

 

[CaddestSlown]

May explain how both men's wives regard them.

This is how Tim Walz's wife looks at him vs. how Vance's wife looks at Vance:
View attachment 6295997
View attachment 6295999


Kama-Kama-Kama-Kamaleon...

Usha Vance has the smile of a truly supportive person. I love to see it. Walz's wife gets off on ANTIFA riot scent so I really have nothing nice to say about her. Cunt.

Should there be a new banner? Biden is basically out of the picture now. Not to mention that one we have now is……creepy

That Liberty Bell edit I made of Kamala's dumb poster could be an okay temporary one, or one of the others that were made. I just think it would be funnier to keep the current one in its decrepit ghoul form rather than it being a gif.

when was the last time he made a public appearance?

I think wishing that girl a happy birthday? He's been seen out in the wild, but that's the last time I remember him going out in front of cameras. Unless that wasn't actually a recent event, but something used to showcase how creepy he is about little girls.

 

[Overly Serious]

Biden is searching for the mashed potatoes.

There's some kind of filter on that. I'm not sure if it's smoothing him out or actually modifying parts of that. I can see it. Am sure others can too, right? Also, repeating the misinformation about Heather Heyer, too.

They cum you go, they cum you go!

Crude joke to make about her but not unfair.

I was thinking something like "Black and Brown toooo____?" but yours is good too.

 

[Basil Julep]

Regardless of one’s actual views on gay marriage, the case that legalized it nationwide, Obergefell v. Hodges, was a terrible decision. It’s rife with awful reasoning, including asserting the constitution guarantees the right to “liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity.”

It’s much like Roe and Casey, in that it stretches the already rather ludicrous concept of Substantive Due Process to absurdity. I would not be surprised if it ends up getting reversed in the future.

Well congress did pass the Respect for Marriage Act in 2022. So now there is a federal law allowing gay marriage. That probably makes it a bit less likely to be overturned since it is now also written law.

 

[BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny]

The new NPC update is in. Another page being taken out of the transgender gaslighting playbook the Harris campaign appears to be running on, they are now proclaiming DNC JOY! It's just like the twisted autogynophile definition of "trans joy", but for kackles and socialism.

 

[Jade Philosophies]

When I was hearing about populism, it was used to criticize unrealistic proposals that would be popular. Eternal gibs, minimum salary of a billion dollars, full debt pardons. That's what I always understood as populism. It stops being populism when people want it and it isn't an absolute pipe dream or horribly cripling. It's just weasel words again since everything democrats offer is textbook populism.

That's what I mean about confusing terms. I'm convinced it has been done on purpose. What you're describing is popularism. Making totally unrealistic promises (or promises you never intend to keep) just to get popular. Rather than promising you'll do or at least try your best to do the things the people want and lay out those things. (Obviously people would like a billion dollars, but they don't go around suggesting the government should make that the minimum wage.)

 

[Overly Serious]

Maybe it's a British thing? (I'm English.) I heard people making the distinction years ago. IRL, either pre-WWW or at least before the web became truly mainstream. I didn't understand why you said irregardless isn't a word so I looked it up and some people just consider it incorrect grammar. I'll just use regardless in the future. I don't know why I didn't really. There must have just been a lot of use of the word "irregardless" lately and it got stuck in my head.

I too am bong, and have never heard the distinction you make. But I'm happy to leave as is. I hope I haven't come across as too strident.

"Irregardless" however, would mean 'without without regard' to. Regardless already means 'without regard to' once. I think it's a muddling up with irrespective which is a word and is very close in meaning.

 

[TheRaptorJesus]

Please, please please learn to thumbnail.

Probably a fag iphone poster, he doesn't understand.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

If "irregardless" were a word, then I'd demand "rerespective" be as well.

The more the merrier!

This is more suited for here than the random images thread:

View attachment 6296011

The fact that multi-ethnic empires have always had to be authoritarian in nature adds weight to this conclusion.

 

[CaddestSlown]

Well congress did pass the Respect for Marriage Act in 2022. So now there is a federal law allowing gay marriage. That probably makes it a bit less likely to be overturned since it is now also written law.

I'll chime in on this one, because more discussion is rarely a bad thing, especially from a less oppositional viewpoint than the Anti-Gay fellas here.

This wasn't really needed.

Pretty sure it was already said and done with when the Supreme Court did their ruling, unless there's policies in that Act that the SC didn't cover. Civil Unions, in my opinion, are fine enough and don't involve twisting the definitions of a word held very dearly to a group of people who aren't very fond of the gays, or who historically weren't.

The only thing I can inject that's a newer thought is the symbolism of marriage probably mattered more than marriage or the legal benefits itself, being lawfully recognized as being able to love who you love with a national stamp of approval.

A goal in the current year (just in my opinion) should be to push back against pedophiles, perverts, and animal fuckers that the slippery slope has allowed to propagate due to loosening standards. It's okay to push back against these things and recognize them as a problem. The more queermos who realize this, the better, because we need some more sanity in the world.

The new NPC update is in. Another page being taken out of the transgender gaslighting playbook the Harris campaign appears to be running on, they are now proclaiming DNC JOY! It's just like the twisted autogynophile definition of "trans joy", but for kackles and socialism.
View attachment 6296037

They're going to start flashing their fake tits soon.

 

[Nuclear Poisoning]

There's some kind of filter on that. I'm not sure if it's smoothing him out or actually modifying parts of that. I can see it. Am sure others can too, right?

I had the feeling something is off too, but that it was just my lack of touching grass coming manifest.

The whole left (stage right) side of his face is weird, the perspective along his cheekbones is not right. I refuse to touch grass and instead want to get into this more. I propose that the left (stage right) side of his face is paralyzed due to a stroke and they're animating it with some AI tool. Notice how his lips on that side of his mouth often barely move when he speaks.

Take for example at 11:27, look closely when he says "whack" (from "supreme court is out of whack"). Pixels on his left eye suddenly drop, and the perspective on the left side of his mouth is incorrect.

Spoiler: screenshots

Aight you can't really see it from my shitty screenshots, but it's definitely obvious if you look at the video in motion.

 

[Your Girlfriend's Dad]

If irregardless isn't a word, than it ought to be, and irregardless of your personal views on the matter, I for one, welcome new words that isn't all nigger speak.

This sentence almost gave me a fucking stroke.

 

[John Badman]

I had the feeling something is off too, but that it was just my lack of touching grass coming manifest.
The whole left (stage right) side of his face is weird, the perspective along his cheekbones is not right. I refuse to touch grass and instead want to get into this more. I propose that the left (stage right) side of his face is paralyzed due to a stroke and they're animating it with some AI tool. Notice how his lips on that side of his mouth often barely move when he speaks.

Take for example at 11:27, look closely when he says "whack" (from "supreme court is out of whack"). Pixels on his left eye suddenly drop, and the perspective on the left side of his mouth is incorrect.

Spoiler: screenshots

View attachment 6296180
View attachment 6296181

Aight you can't really see it from my shitty screenshots, but it's definitely obvious if you look at the video in motion.

Joe has gotten multiple facelifts during his presidency to pull up that Mitch McConnell turkey gobbler. I think we need to consider bad plastic surgery in play alongside a minor stroke.

 

[Random Internet Person]

 

[CaddestSlown]

I had the feeling something is off too, but that it was just my lack of touching grass coming manifest.

The whole left (stage right) side of his face is weird, the perspective along his cheekbones is not right. I refuse to touch grass and instead want to get into this more. I propose that the left (stage right) side of his face is paralyzed due to a stroke and they're animating it with some AI tool. Notice how his lips on that side of his mouth often barely move when he speaks.

Take for example at 11:27, look closely when he says "whack" (from "supreme court is out of whack"). Pixels on his left eye suddenly drop, and the perspective on the left side of his mouth is incorrect.

Spoiler: screenshots

View attachment 6296180
View attachment 6296181

Aight you can't really see it from my shitty screenshots, but it's definitely obvious if you look at the video in motion.

I mean since his stepping down address, it's important to stay critical of his face. He probably had a goddamn stroke. Whenever he's in a video, try to pay attention to his teeth. Someone posted that tweet with the 4 "body doubles" and there's some suspicious shit happening with how different his teeth are from the first three pictures compared to the last one where he has really weird gaps between his bottom set. That may have been angling though.