Law Belgian author sued for writing he wants to ram ‘knife through throat of every Jew I meet’

Link (Archive)

Belgian author sued for writing he wants to ram ‘knife through throat of every Jew I meet’​

2DD48DCE-87F1-4EDD-9894-D86A5D72EB60.jpeg
An influential Belgian author is being sued by the European Jewish Association after he wrote that Israel’s bombing of Gaza made him want to “ram a sharp knife through the throat of every Jew” he meets.

Herman Brusselmans, a popular novelist and public intellectual who appears regularly on television, sparked turmoil in Europe’s Jewish community with his weekly column in the Belgian magazine Humo on Sunday. The satirical piece describes Brusselmans’ vengeful sentiment toward Jews in response to the death of Palestinians in Gaza.

“I see an image of a crying and screaming Palestinian boy, completely out of his mind, calling for his mother who is lying under the rubble, and I imagine that boy is my own son Roman, and the mother is my own girlfriend Lena, and I get so angry that I want to ram a sharp knife through the throat of every Jew I meet,” wrote Brusselmans, who has a reputation for provocative and obscene language.

He added, “Of course, you always have to remember: Not every Jew is a murderous bastard, and to give shape to that thought I imagine an elderly Jewish man shuffling down my own street, dressed in a washed-out shirt, fake cotton trousers and old sandals, and I feel sorry for him and almost get tears in my eyes, but a moment later I wish him to hell.”

War was sparked by Hamas’s brutal October 7 onslaught in southern Israel that saw 1,200 people killed and 251 taken hostage. Israel subsequently launched a military operation in Gaza to eliminate the terror group and bring the captives home.

The Hamas-run Gaza health ministry says more than 39,000 people in the Strip have been killed, though the toll cannot be verified and does not differentiate between civilians and fighters. Israel says it has killed some 15,000 combatants in battle and some 1,000 terrorists inside Israel during the October 7 attack. The IDF says it seeks to minimize civilian casualties and blames Hamas for utilizing Gaza noncombatants as human shields.

Israel’s toll in the ground offensive against Hamas in Gaza and in military operations along the border with the Strip stands at 331.

The war has drawn criticism from world leaders, inflamed global opinion against Israel, and triggered a surge in antisemitic incidents across Europe. The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights found a 400 percent increase in antisemitic incidents reported by various Jewish umbrella organizations.

Prominent rabbis and Jewish groups have accused Brusselmans of normalizing violence against Jews under the cloak of satire.

“We know this is a shock-jock journalist, who pushes the boundaries,” said Rabbi Menachem Margolin, who heads the EJA. “But publicly expressing his desire to stab the throat of any Jew he comes across is psychopathic. Given his popularity and infamy, it is also an invitation for others to do likewise.”

The EJA, which represents hundreds of European Jewish communities, has announced it is suing Brusselmans for “incitement to murder” and demanding his suspension from Humo.

Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, president of the Conference of European Rabbis and the exiled chief rabbi of Moscow, likewise decried both Brusselmans and Humo for “creating a toxic environment that can lead to real-world violence.”

“While, of course, the government and military of Israel are their own distinct entities and have no official link to Jewish communities outside of Israel, we object to this author’s desire to stab a Jew in the throat for that murderous image alone, not for mixing Israelis and Belgian Jews together,” Goldschmidt said in an op-ed for the Jewish News Syndicate.

Brusselmans called the accusations “completely crazy” and argued that his imagery of taking a knife to Jews’ throats was metaphorical.

“With my column, I wanted to say that when something is done to your loved ones for no reason, you are filled with total anger,” he said to the Belgian news service VRT.

His editors have also defended the column. “With satirical writers such as Herman Brusselmans, the writing should never be taken 100% literally,” said Humo’s editor-in-chief. “That is why the editorial staff did not intervene in the text of our columnist.”

But that defense wasn’t enough for Unia, an anti-discrimination public institution in Belgium, which joined the EJA in filing a complaint against Brusselmans.

“Boundaries have been crossed,” said Unia’s spokesperson Carol Poncin. “In our opinion, what he wrote is clearly antisemitism.”
 
I don't see how that organization could possibly have legal standing to sue. He didn't say anothing about stabbing a particular jew
I’d rate this optimistic, but I don’t want to be mean. You truly do not understand how much of lunatics the rest of the world is when it comes to free speech. We are very fortunate in the US to have such strong protections.
 
I don't see how that organization could possibly have legal standing to sue. He didn't say anothing about stabbing a particular jew
In the US, you'd be right. But in the EJew it's another story entirely.

European Convention on Human Rights, Article 10:
Freedom of expression
  1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
  2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
tl;dr - You have "free speech" with terms and conditions, and those terms and conditions are whatever we say they are, prole.


Compare that with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
Pretty unhinged response but probably coming from a good place of sympathy for people suffering in Palestine. Not sure what Belgian free speech laws are like. I don't think it's a good thing to say but he should be allowed to say it.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Karl Franz
Back