- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
His "joke" insults border on the same tier as "But during the Stone Age". A better insult might be something like Rackets the red-nosed retard doesn't know the situation because it's not shaped like brick of coke or a balldo
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2021
Nick is like a salty ex-girlfriend, huh?
- Joined
- May 25, 2024
Looks like he's unable to deny the fact that debt collectors are after him for that $539. I'd bet reading it without having a typical "uh, technically..." deflection up his sleeve for the reply got under his narcissistic skin.
On a related note, has anyone gone over the Ronversations texts and streams recently to see if they contained traces of the obvious mental illness we see in his recent texts with Null? A lot of Kiwis see red flags in his behaviour when watching back his old streams now that we know what a deranged lunatic Crackets is. I'd think they'd be apparent in the Ronversations too.
Also, I vaguely remember him asking Ken Jennings to psychoanalyse him once on stream back in the Vic days. Did that end up happening? Would also be thunk-provoking to watch that with the benefit of hindsight too.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
KEK…
The “non practicing attorney” quips really seem to grind Nick’s gears.
He has no interest in law, but he sure does love the status he gets from posing as an attorney.
Reminds me of the intro he used to do, and still sometimes does. “I’m Nick Rekieta, from Rekieta Law a small law firm here in rural Minnesota…”
Except… When was the last time “Rekieta Law” actually had a case or operated as a law firm?
Nick always made it sound like he’s working on some cases whenever he’s not on stream, where as in reality “Rekieta Law” can’t even bother to represent Nick Rekieta in traffic court.
NICK. IF YOURE READING THIS, I GOT AN EASY W FOR YA!
That 5K gift?
Send your subs some nudes of April and Kayla… Maybe doing some hot lesbian action?
The Farms won’t be able to make fun of you again for forgetting the gift, and I will likely be out of action for a few days and won’t be able to mock you either!
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
Just to make a point about the rule of completeness.
Say the prosecution against Nick introduces an image of him on livestream with white powder on his nose.
Nick, the legal genius that he is, decides to contest this and claims, along other things, that the evidence isn't complete! It's not the whole live stream.
Now, I, a prosecutor, would love to show the jury a sloppy drunk drugged out of his mind on stream, but have likely realized a 4 hour hell stream where he keeps saying animesuckscopeandsneed is very likely to be more prejudical than probative have decided to just show what is relevant.
But if Nick says I've violated a rule of evidence by not showing the whole stream... the remedy is I get to show the whole stream, and maybe even more, because Nick decided to open that door, like a retard.
Say the prosecution against Nick introduces an image of him on livestream with white powder on his nose.
Nick, the legal genius that he is, decides to contest this and claims, along other things, that the evidence isn't complete! It's not the whole live stream.
Now, I, a prosecutor, would love to show the jury a sloppy drunk drugged out of his mind on stream, but have likely realized a 4 hour hell stream where he keeps saying animesuckscopeandsneed is very likely to be more prejudical than probative have decided to just show what is relevant.
But if Nick says I've violated a rule of evidence by not showing the whole stream... the remedy is I get to show the whole stream, and maybe even more, because Nick decided to open that door, like a retard.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2021
As someone who was counted in that 5k I would rather receive nothing.
Scan_Lines
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2024
God could you imagine being on that Jury. It'd be like a rollercoaster that just goes downwards.
They'd have to sit there for 45 minutes while he's gone and how would you not react to the anime sucks part.
Would you have to also provide the jury with the live chat? As he was talking to metokur during it and would you then have to explain who metokur is for completeness?
Where would say the end would be for the rules of completeness?
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2021
Sean is a "practicing lawyer" - I've never seen quotation marks conveying so much seething.
He literally would rather spend $200k than apologize.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
Nick's making a really good case for why his criminal trial should be public. (I'm assuming the CHIPS trials can't be made public in MN, but he's also making a good case for that as well.)
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It wasn't cocaine. It was, like, you know, confectioner's sugar. I just threw some confectioner's sugar on my face before coming back raving, babbling, maniacally gibbering and obviously being intoxicated! I just get like, sugarleptic when I throw a bunch of confectioner's sugar on my face!
JURY: is there some way we can sentence him to death?
Imagine being a THIEF. Like Nick. A thieving liar who promised to deliver something and arrogantly refuses and scoffs at the very idea anyone expects a worm like him to live up to his word.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
As a villain he makes that fucker from Frozen (Hans?) look deep and conflicted and complicated.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
The would-be recipients of the 5K gift should ask Nick to spend the money on therapy for his kids instead.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
This is hilarious.
The one thing that didn't really make sense in his insinuation (now explicit) that his and Kayla's former attorneys in the CHIPS case damaged them through malpractice is the fact that they were court-appointed.
The court-appointed attorneys were presumably on a list of attorneys to appoint in these types of cases, and can be guessed to have developed good working relationships with county staff and local judges, as well as a general reputation for (at the bare minimum) a baseline level of competency.
Sooooooo... What does Nick say?
He insinuates malfeasance on the part of the county in that they "love having her appointed"!!!!!!
Keep in mind, it's not enough for the county to "love" parents having (according to Nick's insane claims) incompetent counsel who are unable to adequately represent parents' interests.
These are court-appointed counsel.
What is he trying to insinuate?
The one thing that didn't really make sense in his insinuation (now explicit) that his and Kayla's former attorneys in the CHIPS case damaged them through malpractice is the fact that they were court-appointed.
The court-appointed attorneys were presumably on a list of attorneys to appoint in these types of cases, and can be guessed to have developed good working relationships with county staff and local judges, as well as a general reputation for (at the bare minimum) a baseline level of competency.
Sooooooo... What does Nick say?
He insinuates malfeasance on the part of the county in that they "love having her appointed"!!!!!!
Keep in mind, it's not enough for the county to "love" parents having (according to Nick's insane claims) incompetent counsel who are unable to adequately represent parents' interests.
These are court-appointed counsel.
What is he trying to insinuate?
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
This year! He represented your girl April on her speeding ticket! Remember?
I mean, he DIDN'T DO A FUCKING THING, no-showed, and she was automatically convicted, but he IS listed on the official docket as being her defense attorney on that case.
Kiwifags eternally felted!!!
I admire your perseverance.
I think.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
I for one, love pages and pages of going over the legal history of Robert Barnes in this thread instead of in the Viva & Barnes thread. I don't know what your problem is.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
So… what caused the Twitter sperging? Stress from his kids so he did some stress release (coke)
Catgirl Tyranid
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
The fleeting high from getting his self-perceived "Win" over the farms is already over?
That's so WEIRD, because I'm still laughing.
- Joined
- May 5, 2024
God I can't wait for this faggot to be locked up. I shouldn't expect anything of these people but even after everything he's still acting such a fucking cunt. He needs to go find a short rope and a dramatic height
DiabeticSydePhil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
For what fucking purpose would you begin tweeting to the world that you believe the county stuck you with intentional malpractice to fuck you and anyone else they hate specifically over? That feels like a pretty explicit claim to make that's hard to walk back as just insinuating.
Surely someone is going to slap him on the wrist as soon as they can now. Like, anyone seeing this involved is gonna develop an axe to grind even if saying this isn't against any kinda rule for a lawyer (I assume it probably is at least a little bit against some rule?).
Someone needs to take his phone away.
Surely someone is going to slap him on the wrist as soon as they can now. Like, anyone seeing this involved is gonna develop an axe to grind even if saying this isn't against any kinda rule for a lawyer (I assume it probably is at least a little bit against some rule?).
Someone needs to take his phone away.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2022
Stephen Hawking walks into Denny's... well, no, he doesn't... because he CAN'T!! *long comedic pause* Because he's CRIPPLED! Let's try that again.. Stephen Hawking ROLLS into Denny's and tells the FAT *smirks* waitress who looks like SEAN *smirks* that he wants a moons over my hammy but when the order came he got some eggs benedict thing??? the point is even one of the smartest men doesn't even know what he ordered at Denny's and he's not even a cop... though is he really that smart though? Considering he can't walk???
