Maybe he shouldn't have written weird bondage porno under the same name he used to practice law, and maybe he shouldn't have written a book supposedly about Christianity with a foreword by a Balldo-encrusted pervert faggot who denies the divinity of Christ.
He literally has no case. He serves at the pleasure of an elected official, and "embarrassing your boss" is a legal grounds for termination in an At-Will setting.
Sounds like he's learned nothing.
The stupid thing is that he took a high profile position and didn't even clean up his social media presence A LITTLE BIT.
Being an at-will employee serving at the pleasure of an elected official means he doesn't have a property interest in keeping the job and a due process claim, but that's irrelevant to a first amendment retaliation claim.
Didn’t the book include references to prosecutors watching CSAM evidence to get horny and then fucking? That’s not an issue of “political correctness.” It’s one of toilet-tier judgment from someone employed by the prosecutor’s office. If he just HAD to publish this garbage under his own name, he should have waited until he’d retired.
Maybe. Did it? I sure as fuck am not gonna read the damn thing. It doesn't seem like my type of reading material.
Okay, now you're starting to convince me he is indeed a total dumbass. Maybe I am being too nice, and I shouldn't feel too bad for him. Lol.
Yeah, I get where you're coming from, but it was a high-profile job in an industry that is hugely reputation-based. If I were one of his colleagues or someone that hired him, the fact that he thought publishing this was a good look would make me question everything from his character to his intelligence to his judgment. Even if it were the type of thing I liked to read.Okay, now you're starting to convince me he is indeed a total dumbass. Maybe I shouldn't feel too bad for him. Lol.
Wait... does this mean he wanted them to read his Christian lifestyle book, with foreword by Nick Rekieta?
I was covered earlier ITT. That’s why I was surprised by your take that he was targeted for being politically incorrect.
I must have missed it. All I read in the recent article was the bitching about the things like "camel jockey" and the specific groups bitching about it.
It was, and it’s discussed ITT. I only point this out because I didn’t think you’d want to be running interference for Gosney as some victim of cancel culture for being “politically incorrect” when that’s far from what happened. I suspect he’ll be peddling this version of events himself soon enough, considering how certain people rush to give money to anyone portraying themselves as victims of the woke mob.But if it was more than that... oh well... suffah Gosney, I guess.
That is bizarre as fuck. His constant selling was kind of a running joke on streams, but jeez.
No, but there are two streams of some people reading from it. Lol, recorded 13 and 6 days ago. I wonder if they will continue it tomorrow. Here's one of them:
Oh no! He hasn't. This is from a few hours ago. More reading? Part 32? It is over yet?
They are reading the PG version. The PG version is Death Penalty Desired where the killed is called the "Jealousy Killer" which is lame as fuck. The R version is Death Penalty Desires where the killer is called the "Sex Toy Killer". I know the PG version is available for Kindles, I don't think the R rated is available digitally as he only sells it on his site and it's a softcover.
I occasionally bring up Gosney making a panel of guests listen to him play bass guitar when talking about funny Internet stuff with my friends but this is honestly a shocking turn of events. This guy is an actual lawyer that moved states to teach prosecutors how to operate and then he pulls this? This is a blunder of immense proportions.
