Who the AFU really needs isn't the F-16 pilots but the guys on the ground who can maintain and repair the F-16s.
They need both, really. The F-16 is an excellent 'wild weasel' aircraft due to performance and maneuverability, but you need skilled pilots to do it. And if you don't have skilled pilots... you get the IDF losing an F-16 to an SA-2.
They also need permission to start hitting Russian airbases inside Russia with their equipment.
Most of what you'll see from Russia supporters is either cope or an analysis of pure military strength
Its mostly cope, but the other thing is they love quoting Russian paper statistics for Russian weapons & vehicles, while going to any turd worlder pedoworshipper's gripe about NATO hardware. Despite the fact for like 70 years there has been one consistent fact of war:
NATO equipment underpromises and over-delivers, and WARPACT Soviet shit screams abotu how great and mighty it is and often never delivers.
"We have more guys than you have bullets" doesn't work when the other guy actually has more bullets than you have men.
This was the response I got saying who gives a fuck Russia did the same during Crimea '14 to people claiming the Ukrainian forces invading Russia now are actually NATO soldiers in Ukrainian Uniforms
Mind you Putin openly admitted they were Russian army on national TV 2 months after Crimea was reunified with Russia.
Apparently RIA Novosti is controlled by the West and NATO
Your first mistake was expecting logic and consistency of argument from Vatniggers.
The Vatnik thread here unironically posts Russian MOD releases and discusses them like they have a bearing on reality, these same releases that claim to have destroyed five or six times the number of tanks and IFVs as Ukraine ever had.
Vs. this thread where we don't bother posting Ukrainian MOD releases except to laugh at them because we understand it'll also be full of slavic lies.
You'll also see them shitting on the F-16 as only being good at blowing up schools and hospitals, completely ignoring that Russia blew up a children's hospital with one of their feared and totally accurate cruise missiles.
This put them in the awkward position of either saying Russian cruisemissiles are the best in the world (which would mean they deliberately targeted a children's hospital) or that they were trying to hit someothing of military value, the closest legitimate military target being over 1km (which would mean their missiles suck and can't hit more accurately than 1km from the target). They also tried to cope by saying that some Ukrainian officer was getting treatment there - which even if true, as an unarmed medical facility, that would be a violation of the Geneva Convention.
So forget trying to get logical consistency from them, they can't even decide which warcrime Russia is committing.