Culture Disney wants NYU doctor allergy death suit tossed because of widower’s Disney+ subscription - Disney argued that the Disney+ subscriber agreement Piccolo signed years earlier on his PlayStation called for any dispute to be “resolved by individual binding arbitration.”

1723580333447.png

Disney is trying to get a wrongful death lawsuit filed by a New York University doctor’s grieving husband tossed — because he signed up for the Disney+ streaming service years earlier, court papers said.

Kanokporn Tangsuan’s bereaved husband Jeffrey Piccolo is currently suing the theme park juggernaut claiming that she suffered a fatal allergic reaction shortly after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant in Florida last October.

But Disney is now claiming the $50,000 suit should be moved out of the courts because Piccolo agreed to arbitrate all disputes with the company when he first signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service back in 2019, court documents charge.

Piccolo’s attorneys, on their part, have slammed Disney’s latest motion as “preposterous” and “outrageously unreasonable.”

In the May 31 motion filed in Orange County, Fla. circuit court, Disney argued that the Disney+ subscriber agreement Piccolo signed years earlier on his PlayStation called for any dispute — with the exception of small claims — to be “resolved by individual binding arbitration.”

The company added that Piccolo agreed to similar language when he then used the “My Disney Experience” app to buy tickets to visit the Epcot theme park in September last year — a month before the ill-fated trip.

Disney has argued that both agreements required Piccolo to consent to the arbitration language before purchasing, the court filings claim.

Piccolo’s lawyers have since fired back, insisting in an Aug. 2 motion that Disney’s argument is “fatally flawed.”

“The notion that terms agreed to by a consumer when creating a Disney+ free trial account would forever bar that consumer’s right to a jury trial in any dispute with any Disney affiliate or subsidiary, is so outrageously unreasonable and unfair as to shock the judicial conscience, and this court should not enforce such an agreement,” the lawyers wrote.

They also argue that Piccolo filed the wrongful death suit as the “personal representative of the estate of Kanokporn Tangsuan” and not on behalf of himself.

Tangsuan, 42, died of a severe allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis just hours after dining at the Raglan Road Irish Pub and Restaurant with her husband back on Oct. 5, the original complaint said.

The physician, who had worked Manhattan’s NYU Langone hospital, had repeatedly stressed to wait staff that she had nut and dairy allergies when she ordered scallops, onion rings, broccoli and corn fritters, according to the filing.

Soon after leaving the restaurant, Tangsuan started experiencing difficulty breathing and collapsed, court papers charge.

Even though an epi-pen was immediately administered to her, she died at a local hospital, the lawsuit said.

Piccolo is seeking more than $50,000 in damages under Florida’s wrongful death act, in addition to mental pain and suffering, loss of income and funeral expenses.

The Post reached out to both Disney and Piccolo’s attorneys for comment.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-ne...h-suit-tossed-because-of-disney-subscription/ (Archive)
 
Okay, I'm ready to lose a few more motes of faith in humanity and the legal profession.

What does the Disney+ subscription agreement or the Park app have to do with the decision to eat at a Disney restaurant?

Because these all appear to be distinct and separate transactions.
The park app argument makes a little more sense because they are trying to turn the EULA when buying tickets into a general waiver for the park the tickets are for. It's still incredibly retarded, desperate, scummy, and unethical, but I can see the flimsy logic behind it. As for the Disney+ argument, I think they trying to make the EULA not apply just to Disney+, but the Disney company itself. Which means any accidents in the parks or restaurants are covered by the EULA.
Not that there is any validity to the argument, but it says they signed up for a trial. Didn’t even sign up to pay. And fucking Disney is really letting their lawyers throw this argument out there over a 50k suit? Also, that number seems low considering this was a doctor at NYU. Typically you could argue for lifetime loss of income, and 50k wouldn’t even cover 6 months.
The suit number has to be higher than 50k. Even when they try their best journos usually get something wrong.
 
The park app argument makes a little more sense because they are trying to turn the EULA when buying tickets into a general waiver for the park the tickets are for. It's still incredibly retarded, desperate, scummy, and unethical, but I can see the flimsy logic behind it. As for the Disney+ argument, I think they trying to make the EULA not apply just to Disney+, but the Disney company itself. Which means any accidents in the parks or restaurants are covered by the EULA.
Yeah, it's infinitely cheaper and better on the PR side to just settle this for peanuts (sorry not sorry), but if Disney manages to make the argument stick then they essentially have a free infinite "no u" pass to make park related lawsuits go away. As cartoonishly evil as it is, it's 100% worth trying.
 
This is a PROFOUNDLY retarded argument on Disney's part. That said, isn't the whole thing with fritters that they're battered veggies/whatever? Doesn't batter contain milk as one of the main ingredients?
Batter for savory foods can be made with any liquid. Beer/seltzer water is better and what most restaurants use because the bubbles make the batter crispier and lighter.
 
the reasonable defense is "we're a normal food joint, not Jimmy Allergen's Clean Room, what the fuck do you expect"
I did WDW with a person who had a mild allergy back fifteen years ago or so, and each time no matter where they did everything in their power to explain "we'll try, it _should_ be okay, but for legal reasons we technically can't promise shit"
The problem was that the staff repeatedly said they could do it entirely allergen-free, which wasn't the case. It's the same reason why restaurants will offer a gluten-free crust then add numerous disclaimers that that it's prepared in a restaurant with gluten, no one is there to handle medical issues, and if you have celiac disease or something similar don't eat it.

It's important to note that the space was not operated by Disney's foodservice, but rather a leased space operated by Great Irish Pubs Florida, Inc. (only location) and owned by two Irishmen. I wonder why Disney is engaged in this bullshit and not pointing fingers at the real culprit.
 
The problem was that the staff repeatedly said they could do it entirely allergen-free, which wasn't the case.
okay now that makes more sense if the staff was fucking retarded and promised that
It's important to note that the space was not operated by Disney's foodservice, but rather a leased space operated by Great Irish Pubs Florida, Inc. (only location) and owned by two Irishmen. I wonder why Disney is engaged in this bullshit and not pointing fingers at the real culprit.
okay now that makes less sense if this is just something on property that's leasing the space, I've known people who've worked at those sorts of joints at WDW, they are a thousand percent a completely legally distinct entity and not even in a skeevy Uncle Walt scheme way like WED Enterprises
 
Remember, Disney also forced a father to remove the spiderman theming of his son's grave
That case was even more insane because due to weird legal shit SONY technically owns spiderman IIRC but disney's copyright troll legal team don't fucking give a shit.

I wonder why Disney is engaged in this bullshit and not pointing fingers at the real culprit.
They take any chance they can to fuck people over by abusing IP shit. Most companies just shut down for profit fan projects but Disney literally them just noticing you having an image of something they legally "own" somewhere in public viewing space will get you fucked through the ringer if they feel like it that day.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Joe Swanson
okay now that makes less sense if this is just something on property that's leasing the space, I've known people who've worked at those sorts of joints at WDW, they are a thousand percent a completely legally distinct entity and not even in a skeevy Uncle Walt scheme way like WED Enterprises
The property was at Disney Springs (Downtown Disney as we all know it), not the theme parks, which is basically an outdoor mall, and of course these involve outside retailers. However, because everything is carefully manicured Disney has a lot more involvement in picking and operating tenants (the situation with your average malls is that even what were once the "nice" malls are often signing up basically anyone who can pay the lease) so there might be some sort of additional liability issues rather than just a landlord.
 
The property was at Disney Springs (Downtown Disney as we all know it), not the theme parks, which is basically an outdoor mall, and of course these involve outside retailers. However, because everything is carefully manicured Disney has a lot more involvement in picking and operating tenants (the situation with your average malls is that even what were once the "nice" malls are often signing up basically anyone who can pay the lease) so there might be some sort of additional liability issues rather than just a landlord.
yeah that's what I'm thinking, buddy worked at the gluten free bakery there for a minute
 
Plus, Walt hated the small hats. Now his company is the living embodiment of small hat business philosophy.
Wasn't the whole "Walt Disney is an antisemite" shit cooked up by Jewish commies because he was testifying in front of the House Un-American Activities Committee about the lengths to which the commies were infiltrating the animation industry through unions, and following WWII any accusation of antisemitism would ensure people immediately conflated you with the Nazis?
 
It's important to note that the space was not operated by Disney's foodservice, but rather a leased space operated by Great Irish Pubs Florida, Inc. (only location) and owned by two Irishmen. I wonder why Disney is engaged in this bullshit and not pointing fingers at the real culprit.
tbh the idea of Authentic Foreign Food Experinece (America Division) Incorporated is almost as dystopian as accidentally signing away your rights because you clicked the OK button on a streaming service TOS to watch cartoon movies.
 
Wasn't the whole "Walt Disney is an antisemite" shit cooked up by Jewish commies because he was testifying in front of the House Un-American Activities Committee about the lengths to which the commies were infiltrating the animation industry through unions, and following WWII any accusation of antisemitism would ensure people immediately conflated you with the Nazis?
iirc it started around him telling the commies to gtfo when they tried to unionize the company
given that he hired the (((Sherman Brothers))) to write basically every damn song it seems Walt wasn't that concerned about the JQ
 
tbh the idea of Authentic Foreign Food Experinece (America Division) Incorporated is almost as dystopian as accidentally signing away your rights because you clicked the OK button on a streaming service TOS to watch cartoon movies.
Even if the company is legally separate from Disney (though their one-off location doesn't inspire confidence), remember the dystopian ideas I shared above? Imagine if that were extended to any business that is connected to any other business in some way...and now you know why BlackRock and others have their fingers in so many pies...
 
Batter for savory foods can be made with any liquid. Beer/seltzer water is better and what most restaurants use because the bubbles make the batter crispier and lighter.

It's less the bubbles for beer and more the alcohol, it boils off at a lower temperature
If you ever want really crispy fried chicken make the batter by replacing half the water with vodka
It'll have so much more crunch and snap
 
Back