Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I am trying to say is that the Department of Education does have a potential non-political use in specific cases, such as requiring a modicum of special education programming and providing funding for it. We don't have the throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Well, on UK, they can't deport illegals due to human rights court from EU. Even under Cuckservarive, they could not report anyone.Imagine how much better the USA would be if the courts were stripped of the ability to do that?
I thought the UK left the EU.Well, on UK, they can't deport illegals due to human rights court from EU.
Nah, court systems remain intact. I think it's from a separate international treaty.I thought the UK left the EU.
I dunno, a rightwing activist court might be pretty badass. It could rule that back-sass from uppity niggers isn't constitutionally-protected speech, and stuff like that.Imagine how much better the USA would be if the courts were stripped of the ability to do that?
I am not advocating for a benevolent dictator, nor am I arguing for the Department of Education to overrule local and state education boards. However, I recognize your position, which is "fuck the federal government."Theoretically, a dictator can stop all the bad things. In reality, a dictator tends to just loot the country and give the spoils to his friends. That's why the founders of America were deeply suspicious of overly centralized power, and in the end, we've realized their worst fears.
I thought the UK left the EU.
If the court was about preserving the rights and not creating bullshit rights, I agree.I dunno, a rightwing activist court might be pretty badass. It could rule that back-sass from uppity niggers isn't constitutionally-protected speech, and stuff like that.
This is the case in my experience: young, cynical people. Or they're straight up shills.I have to assume all the black pillers are young and this is their first election cycle. Trump is currently outperforming himself in 2015 and 2019. He's probably going to get 83+ million votes. For Kamala to win, her numbers need to put Obama and Biden to shame, and I just don't see that happening.
If an influencer can get the money first, then go and say to the world "I'm just here to get the money, Trump '24, this is fake and gay" that would fuck up this plan so much that the uggo zoomer girls running the campaign will have to resort to the Me Too tactic, find NPCs to say Trump and Vance molested them at the RNC, or at MAL.
I do think that the Department of Education serves a policy purpose by, for example, setting minimum requirements for special education programs. While I agree with @Harvey Danger that some kids have severe enough disabilities that they will never function in society, there absolutely are kids with special needs who can be fully- or semi-functioning if they receive some form of education. You cannot educate people after a certain point in their development - studies on feral children prove this. If you don't teach a child to speak at critical points in time, they will never learn to speak. Yes, these are individual cases and it cannot scale, but we have to do something for these children other than call them casualties.
I think that the biggest problem with the youngest generation is that half of them are cynical when it comes to politics, and the the other half is being misled by grifters. People like Fuentes come to mind regarding the second groupThis is the case in my experience: young, cynical people. Or they're straight up shills.
There's a lot of federal agencies that could be good, in the theoretical ideal world where they have minimal responsibilities and never grow. But they always tend to overstep their bounds and grow into something terrible.
My classic example is the Federal Reserve; I want it abolished. Actually, I do want it around, with only a single function: provide emergency loans to insolvent banks, at punitive interest rates, something like prime rate +3000 basis points. However I know if you kept the Fed around, they'll eventually grow back into the monster they are today, with increasing powers, being used to solve problems they aren't supposed to solve... because that's exactly what happened after being established in 1913.
If the DoE was reduced solely to providing guidelines for special ed, or things like minimum instruction days and number of years in a K-12 education, I could agree to that. But once you set up an official guideline "expert" agency, the countdown starts for expansion, power grabs, and eventual subversion. It takes an extremely active and vigilant citizenry to prevent administrative creep like that, and we don't have the mechanisms to enable them right now.
You and I are very much in agreement with one another. Where I think that we differ is that the end of Chevron Deference makes me hopeful that these bullshit agencies can and will be reined in.There's a lot of federal agencies that could be good, in the theoretical ideal world where they have minimal responsibilities and never grow. But they always tend to overstep their bounds and grow into something terrible.
My classic example is the Federal Reserve; I want it abolished. Actually, I do want it around, with only a single function: provide emergency loans to insolvent banks, at punitive interest rates, something like prime rate +3000 basis points. However I know if you kept the Fed around, they'll eventually grow back into the monster they are today, with increasing powers, being used to solve problems they aren't supposed to solve... because that's exactly what happened after being established in 1913.
If the DoE was reduced solely to providing guidelines for special ed, or things like minimum instruction days and number of years in a K-12 education, I could agree to that. But once you set up an official guideline "expert" agency, the countdown starts for expansion, power grabs, and eventual subversion. It takes an extremely active and vigilant citizenry to prevent administrative creep like that, and we don't have the mechanisms to enable them right now.
I agree with this. There is also a concerted effort by genuine crab-in-a-bucket assholes to convince themselves they are right by propagandizing others, coupled with genuine foreign shills.I think that the biggest problem with the youngest generation is that half of them are cynical when it comes to politics, and the the other half is being misled by grifters. People like Fuentes come to mind regarding the second group
I just want the commies gone. Is that too much to ask for?There is a simple fix to all of this. Every year, we roll a d20. If it comes up 1, everyone in the federal bureaucracy is summarily executed.
Lol, Trump doesn't have to do that. All he has do is make a executive order that saysI have an idea for an executive order for Trump.
If you work for the ATF you are legally recognized as a homosexual. This won't change anything for the majority of those faggots, but it'll be nice to have them be cocksuckers on paper.
Wait but what does that have to do with kissing menLol, Trump doesn't have to do that. All he has do is make a executive order that says
"Every single ATF Agent is going to clean up and confiscate every unregistered and felony use handguns in Chicago/New York/<inserted deep blue city> due to their crime and murder rate usage".
A couple of amazing things will happen:
1. A bunch of ATF fed boys will quit on the spot
2. A bunch of black people murder ATF Fed agents.
3. A bunch of ATF Fed agents murder black people
Or a combo of all three!
Kamala would feel right at home in the ATFAn inside source (I made it up) has informed me that the hiring process for the ATF involves kissing a bunch of dudes.