What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

I was watching stuff a while ago about people saying so many military aged men are coming in to the US. I thought it was paranoia. Then I saw people reporting from other countries the same thing. Then in the US mysterious govt armament shipments moving around. Now in Ireland, people have discovered giant compounds in rural areas manned my foreign military aged men who refuse to identify themselves.

View attachment 6306276

So most people won't go along with something like a COVID lockdown this time. But what if this time, the governments had a paid foreign military trained force that owed no loyalty to the communities?

Most of the giant "quarantine camps" that were built during COVID were barely used.

:thinking:
Interesting, got anything more than that video? Wonder if there's something like that in Germany, too. We definitely got a lot of military-age foreign dudes, but I don't think I have heard of compounds like that.
 
Using foreign agents is an old technique. Back in the 70s in the UK, they used police force loans from Germany and Spain to come over and smash up the protestors with the miners strike and poll tax riots. Never works out well because mercs do not give a remote shit about the host nation, so they are happy to sell them out for a better offer, or spill the beans years later because its not their nation. Its a short term solution to a long term problem.
 
Thread tax:
1.PNG
2.PNG
3.PNG
1723585293919848.jpg

What actually happened in 1815? Anonymous 08/13/24(Tue)08:29:51 No.38580543▶>>38581643 >>38581793 >>38583015 >>38583076
It is fairly well known in conspiracy circles that in 1815 the Rothschilds received information ahead of everyone else about Napoleon's defeat and decided to claim Napoleon won to cause a mass sell off that would effectively allow them to buy England. This history is not in any dispute to my knowledge but there is a question that no one has seemed to ask and that is why the royal family did not simply seize back the assets as they were acquired under conditions of fraud? It seems to me that at this point in time the entire dynamic of how power works in the world changed. Prior to this there are many historical incidents where a country's assets were effectively stolen via compound interest and then were simply seized back by whoever was in charge. (little /pol/ crossover here) My question is simply why did this not happen this time? It can be established that actions such as this were the norm and Machiavelli even talked about it in the prince how money does not bring true power or loyalty in the long run as it can simply be sized by those who are stronger. I think it is worth examining WHY this didn't happen as there isn't really any seeming reason for it to not have happened and it is seeming the point in time where wealth transitioned into being the primary form of power rather than raw strength so it seems like something worth digging into.

Anonymous 08/13/24(Tue)11:56:53 No.38581725▶>>38582957
The Rothschilds were having banks all over Europe and were working together, if England did that the Rotschilds could have easily financed another army to overthrow the British crown

Anonymous 08/13/24(Tue)14:37:37 No.38583015▶>>38583045
>>38580543 (OP)
If I have to guess, The Royal Family was on it.
or
The Royal Family was already a Non-agent, a paper tiger with no power, The banks were already ruling.

Something that always intrigued me was the photos of UK coronation room from 1900 (maybe 1908-10) where you the room looked dilapidated and ruined, like it wasn't in used for at least 50 years... I think they were out of power from a long time ago, and they just "put them back" recently to control the people when cameras become more commonly used

Is there a shoe or style of shoe where I can splay my toes in a business sense without looking like a dirty hippy?
They're called square toebox shoes or barefoot shoes and are really popular with terminal gymbros so there's a lot of options. you just have to check the sole shape to make sure it's square shaped. anything with the toe curving in are fucking posers. I also make sure mine are made in america or europe but that's because I refuse to fund the browns. You could also get water shoes for like 30$ on amazon, they're mostly square toe too
Three months and almost thirty pages later I'm here to tell you both that barefoot shoes kick ass.
You can even get wide-toe-box steel toes if you need them.
 
Their parents are beyond shady. You can't leave your 3 children unsupervised,in an unlocked room away, to eat your fucking tapas in peace. They could totally afford a nanny, or bring the kids to the restaurant with them.

I don't know about an overdose, both parents are doctors, maybe Madeline's father raped and killed his own daughter and they covered it up. Or it just happened. They found her dead, but they also wanted some money for their mortgage and they fabricated the whole thing.

Or drop all the kids off at the resort's night daycare.
None of their stories match up anyway with how they tried to imply that the kidnapper was sighted.

I mention overdose because some found it strange that the two other McCann children slept through the search for Madeline, even with all the noise and people coming in and out. This led to the theory that their mother drugged them with sleeping pills so they wouldn't wake up while their parents were out eating tapas.
I do believe that Madeline's familly sexually abused or exploited her. The overdose thing is mostly benefit of the doubt.

It's so creepy and weird how her parents wouldn't shut up about her "perfect little body" and how "beautiful" she was after she went missing. Usually parents whose children disappear talk about the kid's personality, hobbies, or what they brought to their lives.

I know the conversation's moved on from the whole Maddie McCann thing, but I would like to add my voice to the chorus with regards to believing her parents are responsible.

The thing that convinced me the most, ironically, was actually reading Kate McCann's book, and some of the weird shit that she writes in that, but to me, something felt off about that whole case from day one, and all the twists and turns and information that has come out since has only served to compound my suspicions.
 
That's the stone of scone, in the coronation chair that sits in westminster abbey. It's allegedly from the holy land, with the legend claiming it was originally Jacob's pillow, but that's part of a mythology that every jumped up Scottish chief of more than two valleys clung to as justification for their claim of kingship. It's actually a lump of Scottish granite. Nothing to do with Solomon. The reason the chair looks so crusty in that photograph is because it's 700 years old. Its only purpose is for the coronation, which is why the stone is (or was) kept in it.
 
Last edited:
It was noticed, atleast Aspergers, it was just a "that person" or even a "that family" thing instead of a general "autism" thing. And also there weren't as many things that could trigger and be as harsh back then instead of plopping those people full of flashing screens and loud noises all the time with trash food and no socialization.
For autism yeah it was definitely noticed too, it was just a general birth defect like FASD or Down's syndrome instead of a distinct thing.
I think the blurring of Autism and Aspergers is an actual attempt to stop these discussions from being had though, and making "that weird guy who likes to organize shit alphabetically" be the face of autism to the normies is a lot better than the old perception and makes the rise of autism numbers just a "oh it's just because aspergers is counted too now" or a "it's just because more people are finally getting diagnosed" or "it's not that bad, i mean that guy from accounting is good at his job despite being a bit awkward". I personally think autism is going up too but it's not just one factor like vaccines or food, you have to take account modern medicine and society keeping those people alive for longer compared to just handing them off your baby to someone else or having no means to take care of your retarded child 24/7 so they just end up killing themselves. Also it's a lot harder to get away with abandoning your retarded child nowadays or just letting them die.
But yeah I agree there is something pumping those numbers up but we can't forget it's harder to get rid off those people too.
I’m pretty sure that actual numbers are rising due to vaccines and glyphosate (the chemical found in weedkiller). I’m tired of people walking around the fact that ASD is environmental.
...do you know how many boomers I meet with gastrointestinal issues and who suddenly start losing their skills as soon as they retire and aren't expected to maintain anything social or technical?
That could be the effects of aging.
If anything, you pointing this out just makes me think it even more.

Of course, this doesn't mean I think you're *wrong*. "Autism" (as defined as a spectrum) could have always been a thing but now they're letting it run rampant.

You have to understand, I personally believe that outside of the most extreme cases of Autism, it's something that can be managed. The so called "masking" I hear about so much now when someone wants to say someone is autistic but just "doesn't act is" is someone having enough sense not to act like a fucking weird faggot.
“Masking” isn’t something a low-functioning ASD patient can do. You have to be cognizant enough to know how to mask. But ofc self-diagnosed activists always make masking sound like an instinct rather than a learned behavior.
Something that I'm starting to feel was enforced *a lot* more before the 1990/2000s and the acceptance/anti bullying movements.
I think that ever since the 1960’s it’s always been about acceptance.
 
Some Australians believe we're a puppet state of the US, more aren't surprised by the suggestion that we host American and maybe British black sites in the desert. In South Australia in the 50s the Bongs tested nuclear bombs and intentionally irradiated soldiers by exposure to research the effects of radiation.
Why not just nuke some abos?
 
Why not just nuke some abos?
They did. They put up signs in warning signs to move out of the area, but they couldn't read the signs. Australia, the only country to willfully let another country Nuke it. If I remember correctly Menzies agreed for the British to tests Nukes in Australia during the first discussion of it. Back then they were a bit more open and honest about being a client of other states. He saw his duty to the UK over Australia. Australia was to serve. Now they do the same with the USA but there's a little more pretence that isn't the case. Harold Halt probably just got caught in a current. The one to look at is Gough Whitlam. That was a CIA coup because he wanted to move Australia away from being a vassal state which by then had switch to predominantly being a vassal of the USA instead of Great Britain.


I was watching stuff a while ago about people saying so many military aged men are coming in to the US. I thought it was paranoia. Then I saw people reporting from other countries the same thing. Then in the US mysterious govt armament shipments moving around. Now in Ireland, people have discovered giant compounds in rural areas manned my foreign military aged men who refuse to identify themselves.

My guess would be training mercenaries from the third world to conduct coups and military operations on behalf of the Western countries. Long history of the west training soldiers to fuck shit up in third-world countries. Overthrow governments and various other operations.
 
All of insanity is exploding around me and "Joshua Connor Moon" is actually a ftm Pooner named Johanna Collette Moon who serves the US federal government.
tbh the surname "Moon" is pretty troonish. They always give themselves pretty OC-style anime names. You look me in the eye and tell me "Joshua Moon" doesn't sound like someone's made up manic pixie dream boy from a dreamy YA novel about a boy from space.
 
Ehh, this one is a little too schizo for me. But for the sake of the discussion here. Maybe look up the electrical grids load right before earthquakes to see if there are correlations (I doubt this is public info tho...). I can imagine that this would require a lot of energy. Only reason for me to not throw out this "schizo" idea (earthquake weapons, look up "seismic bombs".) is because of there is some research about rocks and their resonance effects due to drilling and underground explosions. Instead of minimizing this phenomena, you maximize it instead. But this is acoustics (pressure waves) we are talking about, not radio waves (electromagnetic waves), which makes think that video you attached is full of shit.
Tesla was working on an electromagnetic generator powered by seismic energy, but it wasn't meant as a weapon. He once claimed it actually caused an earthquake, though.
People might be relunctant to use deadly force on agents of their own community.
The people who actually live there also know the territory, while the imported enforcers might as well be fighting a guerilla war in a foreign country.
Never works out well because mercs do not give a remote shit about the host nation, so they are happy to sell them out for a better offer, or spill the beans years later because its not their nation. Its a short term solution to a long term problem.
It was the beginning of the end for the Roman Empire when they started using mercenaries for border defense. (Obviously there were a lot of other reasons too but I think it's undeniable this was one of the big ones.)
 
Last edited:
Tesla was working on an electromagnetic generator powered by seismic energy, but it wasn't meant as a weapon. He once claimed it actually caused an earthquake, though.
Tesla is always a bit wonky. He had lofty ideas, but usually not executable, and back then journalists were just as dumb and unethical as they are today, and would write anything to sell their papers. So more often than not he'd say that something would be really cool, and whorenalists would write that he totally did that, when in reality it was more like a *hits blunt* "Bruh what if we could use earthquakes for electricity". Just less blunts and more OCD.
 
Back