Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 127 37.4%

  • Total voters
    340
What do you have to hide, Nick? For a guy who has loved the camera for so long and brags about how he is set to defend his infringed rights and set everything straight, you sure are acting cagey.

It's almost like you're a substance-abusing sex fiend fraud who endangered his family and ruined his life and knows that he's about to be embarrassed further in court.
 
I don't find this new matter of public record very interesting. In fact, it's quite annoying that Rekieta is this much of a faggot and is desperately trying to get anyone and everyone to believe his junkie lies and correct the record on everything. From his enabling parents, to already having been living in junkie LaLa Land for the past two years, he literally cannot cope with the fact that he is fucked. His alcy brain literally can't take it, and it would be funny if he wasn't such a cunt about it.
It's the cocaine. Do so much of that drug and eventually you will believe your own hype.
 
So the whole motion is based on the claim that "those people want to video tape my kids and will completely ignore the law that prohibits recording or broadcasting children testimony". (Kiwi Pedos want to see muh children :(:( :( :( )

And it took them 9 pages to make that argument.

It is perfectly clear that a remedy exists.
Allow recording and broadcasting only while no children are in the court room.

Like they did in the Karen Read trial.
 
Is there any more information about the random pedo he referenced in his exhibit that supposedly claimed to be a member of the forum? Or is it more "I made it the fuck up".
He's basically hinging his entire argument off this fucking imbecile who I will crucify if I find out his username -- assuming he even has one or the person in this even sent this mail.

1723738206901-297fe9c9-72d7-4782-a37a-b0df6311d771_1.jpg1723738206901-297fe9c9-72d7-4782-a37a-b0df6311d771_2.jpg
 
Why couldnt they just broadcast/record the court proceedings and censor/pause the recording if a child witness is called???

The court (AFAIK, not an expert) has broad power to mandate whatever they want with regard to how footage of the trial is recorded/streamed/released.
For example, in the case of the hearings related to the the Brian Kohberger case, the judge specifically instructed the cameras to not focus on the defendant for extended periods of time.

They absolutely could do something like what you suggest, Rackets and/or his lawyer are just being obtuse and not proffering that as a solution because he's a cockroach that has no principles. This motion isn't about the kids, it's about preserving Nicky's """"dignity"""" and ego.

edit: clarity
 
You can't make this up.

Nick Rekieta's lawyer argues that the live streaming of court proceedings that made Nick Rekieta hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars violates defendants' rights.

View attachment 6310599

This is next level hypocrisy.
Nick is just an opportunistic sociopath that will have whatever morals benefits him the most in that moment
 
He's basically hinging his entire argument off this fucking imbecile who I will crucify if I find out his username -- assuming he even has one or the person in this even sent this mail.

View attachment 6310594View attachment 6310595
I wouldnt't be shocked if a balldo guard or even Nick himself looked up random pedos in their states sex offender registry and impersonated the pedo in question to frame KF to actually make this argument.

But pedos are generally extremely low IQ so it's not out of the question some attention seeking ween retard would go out of their way to do this.
 
Back