Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.7%

  • Total voters
    349
I wouldnt't be shocked if a balldo guard or even Nick himself looked up random pedos in their states sex offender registry and impersonated the pedo in question to frame KF to actually make this argument
That didn't even occur to me. But impersonating people towards a court, especially on matters of your own legal case sounds hyper illegal. He could have just searched the sex offender registry, found Close's profile, contacted him and simply paid him to send the e-mail instead. It's way more above board if Jason actually sent it himself. That would also explain why the pedo is getting involved in the case despite not living in Minnesota.
 
This reads like a college girl writing her final term paper the night before on an adderall/coke binge. HI NICK!

If Nick's lawyers had any professionalism or any level of respect left in their careers, they would immediately remove themselves from his case and just let him ride this out into the sunset alone, straight to the looney bin.

According to LawShelf, a lawyer may withdraw from a case if their client's mental condition significantly impairs their ability to represent them. For example, if the client is so agitated that they are unable to advocate for them, the lawyer should withdraw. However, if the client can still be represented, the lawyer may not need to withdraw. In these situations, it is important for the lawyer to be honest with themselves, as they are responsible for their client's future
 
Main argument is some retard pedophile said he works for Jersh.

For the kid's privacy, when other trials have been televised and a kid gets on the stand they just don't show em on camera. It's not like there being kids just automatically means no cameras.

Also don't see why the fuck he's bringing up Trump's federal trials not being televised when federal cases basically never are.
 
As retarded as "a pedophile is jumping through the hoops to involve himself in court proceedings, just to record footage of children, which he could do for free anywhere else" is, this Jason character might have fucked it by involving himself. Now Nick has a valid excuse to use his children as a shield against being recorded in court.
No he doesn't, what kind of retarded logic is this? If anyone can collude with any single cretin from the public at large to be a nuisance in order to sabotage legitimate requests like this then you may as well just forbid all recording in courtrooms altogether.
 
Holy fuck. I'm writing absolute novels next time I post about BossmanJack or fat girls... Rekieta is boring as fuck,his case is boring as fuck. Stop forcing it on everyone.
You sound upset.
Unfortunately 17 pages of legal babble takes more than a few words to summarise compared to "crackhead gambles, hit jackpot, loses it all in 10 more minutes".
Maybe download some attention span or just use the block feature.
 
Why does the pedos email have [phish alert] is this just a email protection thing?

Since when do we have a volunteer reporting squad?

Why is nick so scared about his dirty as fuck meth den?

Nick being beligirent about this whole situation is brilliant, maybe hotwife will turn on him when the coke runs out.

Good luck nick you hypocrite so much for those open courts you used to promote.

May your suffering be eternal and the felting last forever.
 
Absolutely amazing, Balldo-boy! You've outdone yourself again! Way to go -- you've effortlessly shown the depths of your hypocrisy hit beyond bedrock! Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if you keep on digging to the Earth's core! BRAVO!!!

As many have already stated, and in a far more eloquent fashion than I could, there are already remedies on the books to protect any minor children called to testify in court. Therefore, your smokescreen *ahem* er, I mean motion is meaningless in this case. Also, calling the kids to the stand, thereby adding further embarrassment and stress to their already stressed-out lives? Get fucked, Rackets.
 
Back