Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 96 25.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 63 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 146 39.2%

  • Total voters
    372
He and his attorney should be working full-time on his defense or whatever he intends to do in court. But rather than do that, Nick has his attorney spending large amounts of time on nonsense while he struts around around Twitter. Not a good plan.
It’s all billable hours regardless to the lawyer. Nick hired a lackey it seems.
 
I don't think they will get anywhere and I really hope the guy files an "in pauperis" defamation suits against Nick and his lawyer for the contents of that filing.
On what basis?

The aggrieved party here is Null and KF. Not the pedo. If the guy is a convicted pedo, he's a convicted pedo. Not much you can do about that. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation.

Null took a ding here with that faggot having an account here and overstating his involvement and association with the site. He's not a "volunteer." He's a random ass user who seems to have mostly flown under the radar. Jannies like @AltisticRight are volunteers. They are expected to provide a service and, as the meme goes, "they do it for free."

I'm tempted to say Null should initiate legal action against the pedo for this crap, but I dunno if there's a basis for it. He needs to fuck off forever though.
 
Qriist having an account with an unchangeable badge of shame is one thing, but the fact that so many users interacted and gave positive reactions to the pedophile instead of flaming him out of every thread he ever posted in is the most concerning thing here.
That's faggotry. I don't care who you are when you are writing stuff. I just read. I won't go into a journey trying to learn what have you done in life.
 
I do not get the point, Tommy Tooter jerked off a dog and was allowed to have an account, is there some moral obligation to ban pedophiles?
Yeah. I understand that Twitter & other social media apps have protections because the membership volume is too large to efficiency combat cp or pdfs. But as a site that still gets shit on for the eariler defending shotacon, we just gotta do better in weeding pedos out.
 
On what basis?

The aggrieved party here is Null and KF. Not the pedo. If the guy is a convicted pedo, he's a convicted pedo. Not much you can do about that. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation.

Null took a ding here with that faggot having an account here and overstating his involvement and association with the site. He's not a "volunteer." He's a random ass user who seems to have mostly flown under the radar. Jannies like @AltisticRight are volunteers. They are expected to provide a service and, as the meme goes, "they do it for free."

I'm tempted to say Null should initiate legal action against the pedo for this crap, but I dunno if there's a basis for it. He needs to fuck off forever though.
I dont know why we would even give credence to this retarded poisoning the well attempt. Dude was just a random user...
 
Can't wait to hear how he justifies this one.
Will it even be a surprise, at this point? Rules for thee, but not for me. He will try to spin it, but his own older content will contradict him. It will get pointed out to him, and he'll proceed to passively-aggressively ignore reality. Yawn.

Just assume that Crackets will be the most evil piece of shit you'll ever see 9.5/10 times and you'll be right on the money. The only circumstances that make him funny are those that make him seethe, like Eric July, Montagraph, etc. Maybe this will, but any cokemaxxed attempts to explain the trial's secrecy will very likely just bore you instead.
 
Qriist having an account with an unchangeable badge of shame is one thing, but the fact that so many users interacted and gave positive reactions to the pedophile instead of flaming him out of every thread he ever posted in is the most concerning thing here.
He was just some random user who flew under the radar, nothing triggered people into looking into his background until now. Now not only is he banned, but his account is branded forever as a convicted sex offender and pedophile.
 
People are rarely charged with perjury. Especially not in a CPS hearing. If prosecutors charged everyone who lied in state court, they would not have time for anything else. Perjury is too difficult to prove. The challenge is not only proving someone lied but that there was a knowing intent to do so, rather than that they were mistaken, misled, confused, didn’t understand the question, etc.
 
If Ethan Ralph, Vito The Pedo, and Daxipad were the people having my back against X or Y entity, I would seriously consider suicide.

You could easily show in court a video of Ethan saying "NICK REKIETA TOLD ME I COULD CUM ON A GRAVE" and then show Ethan having an "exclusive" interview with Nick after the arrest and kill Balldoman's credibility entirely.
 
I do think it's pretty pathetic Nick is using his coke head children as shields and this lolwho pedo because he knows he'd be guilty as sin in that footage in the court of Public opinion. Even then he should just be glad his audience are genuinely low IQ dick suckers
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Qriist having an account with an unchangeable badge of shame is one thing, but the fact that so many users interacted and gave positive reactions to the pedophile instead of flaming him out of every thread he ever posted in is the most concerning thing here.
I don’t inspect the profile and backstory of the user behind every post I react to. If you think this is normal behavior, go back to Tumblr.
 
Back