Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 25.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 62 17.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 142 38.9%

  • Total voters
    365
Why should a judge care what onlookers wear?
Not every judge does, but some judges do. If Rekieta's judge does, it hurts the credibility of those arguing that the public should be entitled to attend and fully observe proceedings. And even if the judge doesn't say anything, a bunch of spergs in t-shirts showing up will occupy another 2 pages of Rekieta's next attempt to block the publication of the actual trial.

I am going to dismiss all this Dresscode sperging as coming from tv-shows a out courts
It's not, and any person who has actually practiced before a judge in a courtroom will tell you to not dress like a retard under normal circumstances where nobody is watching. You may disagree that a suit and tie are proper for these circumstances—and slacks, dress shoes, and a dress shirt will probably be fine in all honesty—but if you want to be totally inscrutable and be certain that you're not causing any problems for the judge, Josh, or anyone who wants to observe the trial in the future, then you should put in the effort to appear serious. In American legal practice outside of the West Coast and certain areas like tech, startups, etc.—and before a conservative judge in a conservative area—serious attire means a suit and tie.
 
This goes for ladies as well. Do not show up in leggings, skirts that rest above the knee, or tight and/or sheer tops.

Show up dressed for a job interview or like you are waiting you turn for the court.
Joke’s on you. There are no women on this website, or the Internet for that matter.
 
Can't you like carry a recording pen or some shit and then transcribe afterwards? I know it's a felony to record it and publish it, but if you keep it to yourself and then use to transcribe, I think it could be useful.
Yes, it is possible to commit a felony. How silly would you feel for becoming a felon and spending time in jail for recording nick rekieta in court?
 
I hope Nick is going to wear his best shirt

Screenshot_20240816-195203.png

The glittery snakeskin and the hot topic belt is going to dazzle the judge because Nick looks so freaking fresh and cool.
 
I would attend the trial if I still lived in Minnesota. Its a shame, because out of all the courts I've been too for jury duty, this is the only one I'd actually want to go too. If you are attending keep it professional and keep it clean, as others have said. If you want to record, record audio. Don't try to get video. It varies from courthouse to courthouse but they usually allow phones, so thats something you can do if you're hardcore about archival. Otherwise all of this will be recorded anyways (in text), and it will be publicly available. Use your own discretion and contact Josh/Null if you want to take notes, like he already stated.
 
In American legal practice outside of the West Coast and certain areas like tech, startups, etc.—and before a conservative judge in a conservative area—serious attire means a suit and tie.
This also isn't night court or muni court. You're not watching people discuss traffic tickets or dog bites. You're going to watch a man on trial for making such a public mess of his life he endangered children. Don't steal Crackets' thunder, let him have his moment on stage. He worked so hard to earn it.
 
Don’t bring a tape recorder.
Don’t bring an autistic fucking spy pen.
Dress nicely and write nicely.
The sperging out in the courtroom is reserved for Nick exclusively.
Seriously, not only is it very illegal, but it will fuck over any attempt to get the trial filmed. If some retard identifying as or suspected of being "from Kiwifarms", there's no way they'd let the trial be filmed by Kiwifarms. Even if you are not immediately caught, sharing the audio/video to the farms will only screw things up.
 
Watching Nick use his kids as a shield reminds me of something. I invite you to take a short walk down memory lane with me. I'm sure many of you remember this. Back when Nick was still beloved on the forum, some people would foam at the mouth and move to make threads about people who made fun of his shitty Vic Lasagna case.

Anyone remember Akheva Cohen? A lawyer that made fun of the case. Someone made a thread for him and put pictures of his kids in the thread. Akheva freaked out and tried to copyright the pictures in order to get them removed. To further mock him, people posted pictures and the address of the school his kids went to.

Nick thought this was hilarious. He laughed so hard. And trying to get pictures of his kids taken down? What a riot! He certainly wasn't concerned about Kiwi Farms supposedly being full of pedophiles that want to leer at children then. He definitely didn't think it was dangerous to them.

I just remembered this and thought it was interesting.
 
How the hearing will go (my guess)
Mrs Rekieta plea out, take the fall for nick or Mrs Rekieta will blame Aaron saying it's his & hot wife's coke (her cards were found with coke on them)

Slap on wrist for Mrs & Mr Rekieta, hot wife will cry blame Aaron saying he forced her it's his coke.

That's why she left Aaron and became the hot wife/nanny Aaron was abusive and stole nudes of Mrs rackets to bribe them and ruin their good image.

Case closed Mrs can space out watching star trek.

Hot wife and rackets continue to do coke, no divorce but Mrs rackets will not be touched by nick because she didn't flush the drugs and will live a miserable life as the third wheel.

This obviously is a work of fiction I think nick should fight this case call everyone a liar and prove the Karen farms are also liars, you got this nick you can WIN!

Fight nick! Fight the government! How dare they plant an Oz of coke in your master bedroom!
 
Last edited:
The no phones thing is pretty common. Last time I had jury duty I kept forgetting and had to go toss it in my car. Obviously this is all part of a massive conspiracy in the US government to prevent the truth of innocent and successful lawyers who ask important people hard hitting questions like, "Do you like your futanari with balls or no balls?" senseless court appearances from coming to light.

What remains? The transcripts from the CORRUPT courts and the word of those gat dang pedophile voluntary Kiwi Farms reporters. Obviously if the report of what is posted here matches perfectly with the court transcript it only proves that this very forum is, in fact, in cahoots with local courthouses. The jews too probably.
 
Back