Convenient how this "private investigator" didn't address this screenshot:
View attachment 6303695
Very convenient
Late, but even without the stuff he said afterwards, the "are you sure you don't like real kids, I won't tell on you" is extremely telling. This is a pedo peeking out of the closet and trying to figure out if he found another of his kind. If the other guy had said yes, he would've 100% said yes as well.
The entire "it's just drawings" "it's just the body type" excuse falls apart if you realize that's not how porn works. The set-up is half the reason why people watch (I guess read in lolicon case) and get off to it, and if you take for example the manga Rev posts screenshots from (collected earlier in this thread), you can see the first panels setting up the scenario, which emphasizes that the kids are kids and are (judging by the tags) going to be abused by an adult that the lolicon is meant to project onto. They're not getting off on the 1 image of someone with a "body shape" having sex, they're getting off on the idea of a child being abused.
If lolicons were normal people, and normal people are disgusted at the thought of having sex with a kid, then you'd think the porn artists would only draw 7000 old dragons having consensual adult shortstack sex or forego the set-up entirely. These people are not normal, they are attracted to those drawings because they SPECIFICALLY depict children that ARE children in every aspect (and every aspect of their age is
emphasized because the artist knows that's what the readers want to read), and they can live out their fantasies of having sex with children. Having those fantasies is, by definition, pedophilia.
How normal people still allow these freaks to say such blatant lies without them being immediately laughed out and harrassed off the internet is beyond me.
