Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2022
you couch surf at some anarcho commune, eat commune slop, and pay for it all with cash, grass or ass.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2021
Bundy wasn't an incel, he had several long-term girlfriends. Porn didn't make him kill, there's some evidence that his grandfather enjoyed killing small animals and involved Bundy in it. It's pretty interesting how much many of his victims looked like a girl he dated who dumped him. He was also almost always blackout drunk while killing. He was just trying to manipulate that fundamentalist preacher when he claimed it all on porn. Either just for fun, or because he could scam something from the preacher. Or because he was bored.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Joined
- May 25, 2014
So, what are the abortion pill cosplayers protesting? The DNC is the party of abortions up to and including the 37th trimester.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
I've been avoiding this subject cause it's like the loli shit only even worse, but the shit MJ had was either one of two things -- Magazines the nudist groups put out (like the American Association for Nude Recreation or The Naturist Society), or some arty farty shit like Jock Sturges's infamous photography books. Neither would be porn, and in fact I believe you can buy both of them on Amazon and eBay today... but I'd never even look them up without being on a vpn in the US. Guaranteed to get you on a list.
The "nudist loophole" was used in the 50s to make nudity in film ok -- some film was put out by a nudist colony at a nudist colony, and a state forced theaters to not show it, so they sued and won. "Nudity is not inherently obscene." If you remember "Lets go Sunning" from the Fallout 3 soundtrack, it was the title song from that film. That's why you had all kinds of 50s and 60s films that took place on or near nudist colonies -- because that was the loophole that let them show some titties. By the late 60s or 70s it wasn't needed anymore.
Similarly, the nudist colony periodicals would have photos of nudist colonies -- and the naked people visiting them. Same general loophole. "It's just naked people, they're not pornographic on their own." So this would also lead to lots of softcore nudie mags claiming to be nudist magazines back in the day, which would let them get away with things decades before Playboy and Hustler and the like solidified that particular market's legality.
Sturges did photo books of artistic nude photography at nudist colonies apparently, and focused on families... and especially on kids. I'd say that doesn't mean anything but he was apparently accused of being / outed as being a child molester in 2021, so fuck him and fuck his fans. But back in MJ's time he was a pretty Avant-garde photographer especially amongst the Hollywood elite and a lot of his photos have been used in album covers and the like.
Similarly, the nudist colony periodicals would have photos of nudist colonies -- and the naked people visiting them. Same general loophole. "It's just naked people, they're not pornographic on their own." So this would also lead to lots of softcore nudie mags claiming to be nudist magazines back in the day, which would let them get away with things decades before Playboy and Hustler and the like solidified that particular market's legality.
Sturges did photo books of artistic nude photography at nudist colonies apparently, and focused on families... and especially on kids. I'd say that doesn't mean anything but he was apparently accused of being / outed as being a child molester in 2021, so fuck him and fuck his fans. But back in MJ's time he was a pretty Avant-garde photographer especially amongst the Hollywood elite and a lot of his photos have been used in album covers and the like.
So, if it was Sturges books, it wouldn't be unheard of during the era, he was pretty popular amongst Hollywood. If it were nudie mags, it could be anything from the nudist colony periodicals (which are nothing worth talking about) to the magazine version of softcore films from the 60s or beyond.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2016
My take has always been:
-Not all jews are world controlling elites
-A lot of world controlling elites are jews
-But not all world controlling elites are jews
Focusing on the jews as so many WN Talmudic Scholars do lets the non-jew elites off the hook and lets them get away with it
The world controlling elites are the problem, not the jews. Ranting about jews just turns normies off.
If Biden speaks tonight God I hope he drops the nuclear n bomb. And declare himself the new HNIC.
TJT
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2017
That's irrelevant though. The entire problem is that Jews are far more likely to get in cahoots with one another than other elites.
This was pretty much the point of Henry Ford's books as he ran into something he didn't understand. He was more than willing to deal with bullshit business tactics but he had never ran into a situation where two completely different parties he had to deal with were willing to collude based on nothing he could figure out. To such an extent that one side had to take great losses until the advantage they sought was achieved. These two entities had no other relation of any kind other than the owners were both Jews.
In any other scenario one party would not take on that risk, which is what stunned him. Years later he began to write his books on noticing such behavior.
This was pretty much the point of Henry Ford's books as he ran into something he didn't understand. He was more than willing to deal with bullshit business tactics but he had never ran into a situation where two completely different parties he had to deal with were willing to collude based on nothing he could figure out. To such an extent that one side had to take great losses until the advantage they sought was achieved. These two entities had no other relation of any kind other than the owners were both Jews.
In any other scenario one party would not take on that risk, which is what stunned him. Years later he began to write his books on noticing such behavior.
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2023
The Jew plebs are still complicit by their disproportionate support of leftist positions and beliefs and them wanting to remind the goys about the Holocaust and what a great crime it was forever. My take on the JQ is that it is not so much that disproportionate Jewish influence on our society is necessarily the biggest cause of our current societal malaise but that it is more of a symptom. After all, FDR and Wilson were both gentiles and the Radical Republicans and other such Southbashers were mostly composed of moralistic New Englanders, not kikes. It was Gentile figures such as Napoleon that allowed the Jews to be free and start influencing greater society in the first place and it was mostly Gentiles that granted the Jews their own state in the Holy Land. The Jews only really started to "take over" in the 60s and while I'll admit that the worst of Current Year/Clown World has been constructed by Jews, the first bricks layed for the construction of Clown World have been layed by Gentile bricklayers. Saying that the Jews have done 100% of the bad is a cope for what is ultimately a Gentile failure. In other words, hold the Jews partly accountable for the current state of society, but acknowledge that Gentiles played a part too.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
So I'm just catching up but is the DNC just like 12 different hyper autistic protest groups trying to scream over each other?
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
My issue is that there are tons of non-Jewish, world-controlling elites who cause problems and never get the shit they deserve. Klaus Schwab isn't Jewish. Ted Turner isn't Jewish. Xi Jinping isn't Jewish. Warren Buffett had a Jewish mother, but was raised Presbyterian and has never identified or associated with Jews (although dweebs online will REE REE REE all the way home that his mother was Jewish). Charles III isn't Jewish. Not a single American president has been Jewish. Mukesh Ambani isn't Jewish. I could keep going on and no one ever looks into these figures or the political policies that their money advances.
Trying to bring this up gets you called a kike, though.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Report (by the committees on Oversight and Accountability, Judiciary, Ways and Means) was published alleging that Biden can be impeached:
Revolves around foreign business deals, and favors. Deals that supposedly enriched Bidens significantly.
The report is 291 pages long.
Revolves around foreign business deals, and favors. Deals that supposedly enriched Bidens significantly.
The report is 291 pages long.
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
*golf clap*
That is the exact parody one should expect with that image.
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
This is an astonishingly bad look for the left. These are their people. These are the people that ran amok in 2020. They cannot be controlled by their left wing masters, and yet we know they will make no effort to stop them.
I really wonder how many people will look at these riotous children and decide "I cannot stand with that. "
I really wonder how many people will look at these riotous children and decide "I cannot stand with that. "
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
For the 100th time: no, Bernie supporters are not super passionate idealogues who just won't support their Democratc masters when betrayed. Less than 5% of them stayed home after Clinton backstabbed him; 75% of his "supporters" voted for her. You might think that's an important margin to lose, but Bernie only ever polled about 6% of Democratic voters anyway, so a tiny slice of a tiny faction becomes meaningless.
Bernie was just another flavor of mindless Democratic loyalism offered to the base to make them feel like they're part of An Important Movement. Specifically he's the "outsider rebel" flavor, just like these Palestine protesters are the "revolutionary masses" flavor--a slightly deeper Bernie flavor, with a hint of fire and lingering fruity notes. They aren't bringing anyone down, they aren't losing anyone any election.
These assholes are the BLUE NO MATTER WHO idiots you see on Twitter. Today they're getting the angst out of their system before they do a 13 part Tweet chain explaining why they're holding their nose and voting for Kamala anyway. I'm sure she'll lose about 5% of them, just like Bernie; the actual Arabs, Palestinians, or their immediate friends who are legitimately upset. Everyone else is more upset by Trump, and they'll show up in November to vote against him.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2019
This looks like the same 6 foot tall blond bolt-ons troon from another video from last night he was getting in cops faces.
grocerygoblin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2023
The trial backfires on democrats when the judge sentences Trump to 4 years of community service. Specifically as the president of the United States since serving public office is technically community service.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
I want to see the Kamala poster from the Obama guy but with the bottom reading:
FWEEDOM
FWEEDOM
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
One thing I've been increasingly noticing in my city is lots of 65+ boomers who are very well dressed wearing expensive jewelry ect next to lots of exhausted/depressed looking poorly dressed men and women in their 20s/30s.
We all know the economic reports are Pravda tier bullshit. It's clear the only people doing well are older Americans that sold their homes to Blackrock for 500k-1 mill while everyone else eats shit.
We all know the economic reports are Pravda tier bullshit. It's clear the only people doing well are older Americans that sold their homes to Blackrock for 500k-1 mill while everyone else eats shit.
Last edited:
Gondolindrim
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2020
What I'm getting at is that I think it's more than some. The Israelis must have no confidence that Trump will actually give them the same freedom that Biden does.
- Status