Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Officially putting in my application for a boyfriend free girl right here right now. My requirement are as follows:

  1. She must be alive (this one is big)
  2. She must be of age
  3. She must be cisgendered
  4. She must be non related.
Women will see this and accuse you of having abnormally high standards.
 
Women will see this and accuse you of having abnormally high standards.

About point 1, would it be necrophobic if you excluded dead women from your dating preferences? Or would it be misogynistic if you dated a dead woman because there is a power differential and there is a high likelihood of abuse and controlling behavior from the man?

Probably both at the same time ala racism if you do date BIPOC, racism if you don't date BIPOC.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Anondorf
Addressing a much earlier question, can women actually love?

Yes, but women aren't men, and you should neither expect nor want a woman to love like a man does. It's not equal, it's not supposed to be equal, and if what you want is for someone to love you the way a man loves a woman, you're a faggot.

A man loves a woman as her protector and provider. A woman's love doesn't encompass her endangering herself to secure your safety because she, not you, is the smaller, weaker member of the species. She needs your protection, and that need is not a failure on her part. You, however, are in fact failing as a man if you need a woman to protect you.

When a woman loves you, she cares about your well-being in a different way. Her priorities are more on your health and happiness. It will make her happy to see you eating a good meal she prepared, or to know you feel comfortable talking to her. A woman who uses your emotional vulnerability as a weapon doesn't love you. When she gets after you because you eat too many chips, or need to go to the doctor more often, and all that, it's because she loves you. Women don't do that with guys they don't give a shit about. That whore upthread who drove for two hours to ride Private Chadley's dick? She doesn't care if he has a good breakfast or drinks too much.

Also, the reality is that, as her protector, you can't shatter her confidence that you can fulfill your role. Nature made women incapable of securing their own physical well-being, so despite modernity providing them a cocoon, the instinct to drop a man who can't take care of them remains. You have to have your shit together, and in periods where you don't, be visibly working toward getting it back together.

Where things are upside-down right now is that I can tell you, point blank, that you're failing as a man if you don't fulfill your role, but nobody is going to tell a woman she is failing as a woman if she doesn't do X, Y, and Z. Women can't do anything wrong, women are perfect, women are entitled to everything they want, etc. But, the truth is, in a marriage (because that's where love happens, not when you're just fucking each other while looking out for the next good fuck), a woman who isn't caregiving, nurturing, etc is failing at her role.
 
Resolving asset disputes in the case of [...] divorce [...] does, however, require the state, and [...] marriage [...]
1694123617265.png
 
How original. Thank you for your stunning and brave contribution.

:semperfidelis:
You realize that these kinds of statements play into misogynist narratives that the only thing women can provide men is sex
Don't spoil it for him, it's the only time he can be openly misogynistic without it harming his social reputation. Let him enjoy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qonas
Women can't cook
Women can't clean/maintain cleanliness (judging from male vs female toilets)
Women find it difficult to stay loyal (due to hypergamy/hoping for better options)
Women can't offer emotional support/a shoulder to cry on/play the motherly role because a man that shares his feelings to her gives her the ick
Women aren't even good at performing the biological role of motherhood/aren't even good at parenting (eg the single mother epidemic and the serial killers that they raise) and that's assuming they don't hate children in the first place
Women aren't even good at careers after sacrificing their younger years not having children (eg career women CEOs who quit at the first sign of trouble because they can't handle the pressure like the FBI Trump Assassination woman)
Women, like some men, often aren't good at finance or saving money (eg the entire advertising industry basically targets women eg the majority of national consoooooooomer spending is by women)

wtf are modern women good for then
The women I've dated have all made less money than me, been much more keen on spending than me, ate worse and had poorer cooking skills than me (and I'm far from a fancy chef), kept their places less cleanly than I do, and just generally had very few practical skills of any kind.

So I'd have to cook for two people, I'd have to clean for two people, I'd nearly double the chores and home/auto maintenance that I already do, and I'd end up with less surplus cash for the trouble. It's very much an Office Space-esque "what would you say you DO here?" situation.
 
The women I've dated have all made less money than me, been much more keen on spending than me, ate worse and had poorer cooking skills than me (and I'm far from a fancy chef), kept their places less cleanly than I do, and just generally had very few practical skills of any kind.

So I'd have to cook for two people, I'd have to clean for two people, I'd nearly double the chores and home/auto maintenance that I already do, and I'd end up with less surplus cash for the trouble. It's very much an Office Space-esque "what would you say you DO here?" situation.

Why would a woman who's putting conscious effort into being wife material spend any time with you? You've said over and over you don't want a woman in your life permanently, and any woman who's with you had better not be thinking about a future with you. So it sounds like you're self-selecting to only be with lazy sluts, and isn't that what you want? Some woman who isn't invested enough in her own future to care that you're just going to leave after you get bored of using her holes?
 
And white people are Jewish slaves who are destroying the world.
Women are not people.

everyone in their life has drank from a bottle before and should know exactly how this should look like
I think this is where the fuckup comes from. Imagine you're taking a drink from a half-empty bottle that you had to tilt somewhat. What does it look like from your point of view? Since you're drinking, the water will always form a plane from some lower part of the bottle all the way to the opening. I know it's a retarded explanation, but I believe this is the mental image foids see when trying to solve the horribly misogynistic thought experiment of a tilted water bottle, and the anti-gravity water is simply their interpretation of it.
 
Last edited:
Why would I even consider marrying a woman who doesn't improve my life in any way?

Why would you expect to find a woman who will improve your life when you're very clear that all you want is a slut who won't cry when you dump her for a new hole?


I think this is where the fuckup comes from. Imagine you're taking a drink from a half-empty bottle that you had to tilt somewhat. What does it look like from your point of view? Since you're drinking, the water will always form a plane from some lower part of the bottle all the way to the opening. I know it's a retarded explanation, but I believe this is the mental image foids see when trying to solve the horribly misogynistic thought experiment of a tilted water bottle.

I think this is a good explanation and ties into how women are very bad at thinking about situations that don't involve them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neodanthril
you're very clear that all you want is a slut who won't cry when you dump her for a new hole?
That's not the case at all. I haven't so much as been on a date in 6-ish years.

Now that I understand the essential nature of romantic relationships (a nature that you yourself have outlined in this thread), I don't want any part of that shit.
 
That's not the case at all. I haven't so much as been on a date in 6-ish years.

I'm just going by what you said you wanted earlier.

Now that I understand the essential nature of romantic relationships (a nature that you yourself have outlined in this thread), I don't want any part of that shit.

Then what are you complaining about? You have everything you want. You're alone, love nobody, and are loved by nobody.
 
Why would you expect to find a woman who will improve your life when you're very clear that all you want is a slut who won't cry when you dump her for a new hole?
What exactly is the difference between the two? Every guy wants a girl who'll be a slut for him EXCLUSIVELY, the outward appearance of the trad waifu walking through the hwheat-fields raising kids but behind close doors for the husband she acts like a slut who solely exists to serve him sexually because she willingly gives him her genuine burning passionate desire. I don't believe that virginity is the sole deciding factor that'll make or break a marriage, take Crowder for example, he his married his high school sweetheart, they were virgins till marriage and their marriage died cause of dogshit on the floor to which she then takes the opportunity to pivot into a "conservative whamen influencer" brand by running his name through the mud with a deceptively edited video to destroy him then using his name to build her own. I've done the polar opposite but I've never had a relationship die due to poop on the floor.

TLDR: A Conservative trad virgins until marriage died cause of dogshit on the floor, so
 
The women I've dated have all made less money than me, been much more keen on spending than me, ate worse and had poorer cooking skills than me (and I'm far from a fancy chef), kept their places less cleanly than I do, and just generally had very few practical skills of any kind.

So I'd have to cook for two people, I'd have to clean for two people, I'd nearly double the chores and home/auto maintenance that I already do, and I'd end up with less surplus cash for the trouble. It's very much an Office Space-esque "what would you say you DO here?" situation.
I've dated plenty of women and been in multiple LTRs. You want to know how many women haven't wound up making my life more difficult? One. Just one.

If they cooked (and it was never as good as me cooking, mind you) then they were messy and I had to clean everything. If they cleaned, then they couldn't cook. None of them could do basic home maintenance. None of them could do simple things like install a shower curtain or assemble furniture. None them could do even the most basic of home tasks and that's why they all got the boot. It's ridiculous how messy they would let their homes get while they would sit around and play on their phones.

Almost every woman I have been with has usually doubled my workload. None of them ever made my life any easier. Some weren't even pleasant to be around. Then they all have gall to give me shit when I tell them we're done. You don't get thank yous. You don't get any rewards for any of this crap. It's almost always been more work for no payoff.
 
Back