State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
I mean, I think that finding cocaine in the house was why CPS suddenly changed their tune from "does not fit the definition of child abuse or neglect" to pursuing charges.
Did they pursue after the warrant was executed? Because nick said sweep was there during the warrant execution.
 
Did they pursue after the warrant was executed? Because nick said sweep was there during the warrant execution.
CPS was notified of the search warrant execution (there were children in the home). Upon execution of the search warrant on May 23rd, drugs were found. All adults were arrested. This put the children on a law enforcement hold. Sweep showed up fairly late in the process.

At this point, the children enter "CPS custody", even though they are placed with family. CPS is obligated to get involved at this point. Drugs found in the home is prima facie evidence of child neglect at a misdemeanor level.

The primary details for this are in the CPS omnibus hearing findings of fact et. al. issued by the judge.

I hope that answers your question.
 
So Nick is saying that the clipped video is not the original, so that invalidates the warrant. That sounds legally shaky geound to me, but IANAL...
That might go to admissability but isn't really relevant as to whether it could be used to support a finding of probable cause. If they wanted to use it at trial, they'd probably be best off getting it from YouTube or wherever else he's uploaded it. It's a hoot this loser is being forced to disavow his own content though. Real genius move openly committing crimes on video.
 
That might go to admissability but isn't really relevant as to whether it could be used to support a finding of probable cause. If they wanted to use it at trial, they'd probably be best off getting it from YouTube or wherever else he's uploaded it. It's a hoot this loser is being forced to disavow his own content though. Real genius move openly committing crimes on video.

I assume the county would get the subpoena from Google before trial. As others have mentioned, PC is a lower standard than a trial standard. Consensus seems to be that what Pomplun had was enough to get a warrant, but it should be better organised for trial scrutiny.
 
It makes sense to me, they got a report for possible child neglect and drug use, asked CPS if there was an endangerment problem with the kids, CPS said no not legally, and therefore the cop very specifically asked to look for the drugs and only the drugs. The warrant application doesn't really go into the kids apart from mentioning that there was a report of them being smelly and possibly neglected, which is just a fact, and also a sign of druggie parents. He then lists all the other stuff that signifies druggie parents, or Nick in particular.

The cop only asks to look for drugs and doesn't talk about child neglect as the crime at all. That's just gravy because guess what, being white trash drug addled parents fucking other white trash fucks up your kids.
 
Nick has subpoenad Quin Pomplun and Robert Braness to appear in the hearing tomorrow
1724167611325.png1724167642356.png
 

Attachments

Nick has subpoenad Quin Pomplun and Robert Braness to appear in the hearing tomorrow
View attachment 6327625View attachment 6327628
@Null

Could your legal representative make a personal appeal to Pomplun after the hearing? I imagine Pomplun is a busy man, but I would think that he likely cannot stomach allegations that he is corrupt? You have the clips of Rekieta and Rekieta’s close personal friend Robert Barnes implying and alleging that Detective Pomplun is a dirty cop.

If it’s not a hassle could you see if any of the lawyers think that might be possible avenue for the bodycam? I don’t want to piss off the cop, but if he’s gonna be there and you have a lawyer there, well, it might be worth a shot.
 
Wait, a lawyer can just subpoena someone roughly 24 hours in advance? That sounds... deeply unpleasant.
I was about to say the same thing, all this last minute stuff almost feels like a strategy. First the motion for the prosecution to deal with, and now this.
I'm surprised this kinda thing is allowed by the court with no time limits, surely you can't expect people to just show up reliably with no notice, and be in contempt of court if they don't.

Does he want them to not be able to show up to discredit the cops? Sounds just retarded enough to be a Russell Greer/Nick Rekieta move.
 
I looked a little further. Both are peace officers and were "served" via Lori, whom I presume was at the front desk, at the Kandiyohi County Sheriff's Office. Service itself was Monday August 19th (yesterday). It was filed this morning at 8:07 AM. (How much money on the service being near end of business Monday?)

It is a little less outrageous to serve cops without much notice, I guess.
 
I wonder what it would take to get Kiwi's Press Passes?
The Assets & Branding page only says:
The Kiwi Farms™ is property of Lolcow LLC™ and has an Internet famous brand recognized by tens of dozens of people around the world. As such, we expect people to use our Internet famous Kiwi Farms™ assets with the respect and care it deserves.

If @Caroline Farrow can make her own KF shirt, I think a respectable person could make their own KF press pass.
 
my brain was melting trying to figure out how he misspelled Robert Barnes so badly, but it's just another cop.

There is legitimately some sort of SCP event regarding these names.
My mental image is that Joshua Moonson looks just like you with a mustache, Alisha Sweeps is a palette swapped Elissa Clips, the guy with a name like Metokur is just Metokur with a different hat on (same wheelchair), and that Robert Barness is Robert Barnes in a wig.

I’m waiting for Richard Lord to be a witness for the prosecution and it’s just Dax, but not balding or fat.
 
Could your legal representative make a personal appeal to Pomplun after the hearing? I imagine Pomplun is a busy man, but I would think that he likely cannot stomach allegations that he is corrupt? You have the clips of Rekieta and Rekieta’s close personal friend Robert Barnes implying and alleging that Detective Pomplun is a dirty cop.
What you're suggesting would be witness tampering.
 
Back