The defense is arguring that the warrant was filed based on heresay, effectively Steel Tow "Shoe"'s video contained edits that alter the contents of Rekita's stream enough that they feel confident contesting it. The bodycam footage will be used in court, but the elements pertaining to April will not be used in the event she does not testify.
Sean and others have been over this before; Aaron the cuck was not a vital aspect of obtaining the warrant.
This faggy song and dance about "what footage did Pomplun even see, stalker child" won't do him any good either.
Pomplun is an expert witness, and the footage corroborated what the multiple mandatory reporters already testified to: Clear signs of drug abuse.
At most, the prosecution will have to go the extra mile of getting the original footage.
The bodycam footage will be used in court, but the elements pertaining to April will not be used in the event she does not testify.
I guess that's fair, but how would that possibly help Nick? Does he just want his live-in skank out of the footage on principle?
Or is he worried what she might testify to, and additional charges coming up in this game of "whose coke is it, anyway?"
The warrant did not cover firearm possession so the defense wants something dropped because of that, but also the guns were just lying around
Why are they even making that argument when it clearly falls under plain view doctrine?
The officer, Pomplun, who filed it is accused of taking the side of Steel Toe, in essence having a vendetta against Rekieta
Spicer, Minnesota, has always been a hotbed of macchiavellian intrigue and government conspiracy. Of course!
For months, this smug cunt has been bloviating about getting the warrant thrown out, and this is supposed to be it? This ain't it, chief....
