Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Stupor Mario]

Only if you’ve been fortunate enough to avoid dealing with sick narcissists before. Believe me, it gets old fast.

If I had to deal with Nick and his constant teenage drama queen bitching, whining and complaining about everything in real life along with his insufferable smugness instead of observing it all from the comfortable safety of my computer screen (never mind having to deal with the narcissism), I'd probably die of irritation and exhaustion.

 

[Doctor John B. Zyklon]

Man I really hate Nick. The government does not get to lie. I as a prosecutor have an ethical obligation NOT to lie, I have an ethical obligation NOT to prosecute cases I don't think I should be prosecution in good faith. He's about as obnoxious as a sovcit at this point.

We both know that isn't true. C'mon now.

 

[Zab McMann]

I've been trying to keep track of his current argument. He indiciates his argument is not that the stream is not accurate, but rather his argument is that the officer lied about seeing 'his stream'.

I have no fucking idea what retarded shit he is on with that.

Sounds like he's trying to get the officer in a lie since he saw a restream/copy rather than the original, hoping that'll get the warrant thrown out.

It seems retarded from a layman's perspective, and probably very retarded from a lawyer's perspective.

 

[AnOminous]

Yup. He even says that the "lie" isn't even material because, you know, the video is identical to his. He's saying that the vague origin story wording of the video is a deliberate deception, for no known reason or advantage, that magically makes the warrant invalid.

Probably about 5 minutes of examination by the court. "Q: Ofc, Pomplin did you believe the video provided the court was a true depiction of the defendant when you applied for the SW? A: Yes"

And again, something White does repeatedly in this motion, is try to baffle the court with bullshit by mixing arguments about probable cause with arguments about what would be admissable at trial, two entirely separate issues with different standards.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I'm not an alcoholic wet brain, but I'd wager he's trying to cut a fine line between not the original stream as compared to a second-hand copy that has been edited. The problem being, outside of the water mark, restreamers don't do anything else to the source video. I understand Nick's argument of "it's not the original," but I also understand the police version of "it's the best we could get since the original was hidden." But even if the police are 100% wrong on that, they also have testimonies from the mandated reporter and others. As an uneducated every-man, this makes me want to say, "Okay Nick, prove you weren't unhealthy looking, swaying back and forth, repeating Cope and Sneed, with white powder on your nose." You have the video/evidence, prove us all wrong Nick. Did the police lie, I'd say it depends on who you ask; if I couldn't access the original, but let's say there were multiple copies around that all have you acting the same; fine, I didn't get it off your channel, but you're still acting like a fucking druggie.

As for him acting like a retarded sovereign citizen; most people mock his shitty Denny's joke with Kurt, but also remember he made an insinuation that he wouldn't report a massage parlor girl being held against her will.

He's just (as ever) using lame word tricks to try to thread some imagined needle. Nevermind that there's no needle to thread.

THE COP LIED THAT HE WATCHED MY ORIGINAL STREAM.

And? Are you saying that wasn't a true & honest recording of your stream?

THE COP LIED THAT HE WATCHED MY ORIGINAL STREAM. I HID IT BEFORE HE COULD HAVE SEEN IT ON MY CHANNEL.

So? Are you saying he based his probable cause warrant on a misrepresentation? (note to self: hid incriminating recording (s?))

THE COP LIED THAT HE WATCHED MY ORIGINAL STREAM. THROW IT ALL OUT. ALL OF IT. I MEAN, I'M NOT ARGUING THERE ARE LEGAL REASONS TO THROW IT OUT BUT THE COP LIED THAT HE WATCHED MY ORIGINAL STREAM.

Oh, ok, are you suggesting the the police were deceived?

THE COP LIED THAT -

Or that what he watched is inaccurate?

THE COP LIED THAT HE WATCHED MY ORIGINAL STREAM.

...two months later...

[Recording verified as faithful copy of original stream; "taken off of" determined colloquial and ambiguous but in any event of 0 relevance]

"All rise."

THE COP LIED THAT HE WATCHED MY ORIGINAL STREAM.

 

[TherapyMan]

Kids don't get neglected and exposed to drugs without BOTH parents failing. Kayla is like the failed mother who lets her partner abuse her kids or even actively facilitates the abuse.

Nobody is arguing both parents didn't fail. Everyone understands they're both horrible parents. They're all bad people. I am just not sure why people want to insist that Aaron, April, Kayla, and Nick are all equally horrible. That's retarded.

Obviously Nick is the worst as the chief facilitator and instigator. I'm not sure why there's any argument on this point.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Nobody is arguing both parents didn't fail. Everyone understands they're both horrible parents. They're all bad people. I am just not sure why people want to insist that Aaron, April, Kayla, and Nick are all equally horrible. That's retarded.

Obviously Nick is the worst as the chief facilitator and instigator. I'm not sure why there's any argument on this point.

bruh if you can't understand why our wife is just as bad as balldoboy there's no hope for you. Maybe your mommy was also a pilled out whore sorry for you bro.
Also we have absolutely zero proof that balldoboy was chief instigator but keep stating your headcannon as fact

 

[parsnip]

Didn't the request for the warrant say the cop "viewed a video taken off the youtube channel" I don't think it specified WHO took the video off the youtube channel. It could have been the cop, or he could have been viewing a copy taken off the channel by someone else. I don't see any lie there.

You'd think Nick, of all people, would appreciate how slippery language can get.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

And again, something White does repeatedly in this motion, is try to baffle the court with bullshit by mixing arguments about probable cause with arguments about what would be admissable at trial, two entirely separate issues with different standards.

One funny factoid is that, Defense Lawyers, god love them, basically have no ethical standards and do shit like this all the time.

D/C has made me angrier than any prosecutor has.

Except maybe that unethical moron Binger.

 

[parsnip]

One funny factoid is that, Defense Lawyers, god love them, basically have no ethical standards and do shit like this all the time.

D/C has made me angrier than any prosecutor has.

Except maybe that unethical moron Binger.

I love that we have actual lawyers in this thread. Why do defense lawyers behave that way? Are they not held to the same standards as prosecutors?

 

[anionfarflung]

He's so brain damaged at this point he'd fucking lose at Tic Tac Toe, a pointless game thats impossible to win if both people are paying attention.

It's a "solved game" as we say in Comp Sci, and I assume - sooner - in Game Theory.

It's like watching a Jedi or a vampire use sheer force of will to try and dominate his victims.

"These are not the Balldos you're looking for."

 

[Mandatory User Name]

You really can't rule that something is a lie if it can be (mis)interpreted several different ways, what's likely to happen is they'll ask the officer to clarify what he meant and then move on with that interpretation. Misunderstanding someone doesn't make them a liar but Nick desperately needs it to be a lie, otherwise the case will just move on to the trial phase.

 

[AnOminous]

Nobody is arguing both parents didn't fail. Everyone understands they're both horrible parents. They're all bad people. I am just not sure why people want to insist that Aaron, April, Kayla, and Nick are all equally horrible. That's retarded.

Nick and Kayla are equally bad. April is possibly worse. Aaron is a slimeball but not as bad as the rest.

You really can't rule that something is a lie if it can be (mis)interpreted several different ways, what's likely to happen is they'll ask the officer to clarify what he meant and then move on with that interpretation.

Actually you can if it's intended to mislead. In fact Bill Clinton lost his law license over dumb word tricks like that.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

I love that we have actual lawyers in this thread. Why do defense lawyers behave that way? Are they not held to the same standards as prosecutors?

Defense lawyers are not held to anywhere near the same ethical standard so they can do all sorts of very frustrating BS.

For instance, if defense counsel files a reasonable motion that does not prejudice the prosecution, I really can't oppose it by the ethical rules. IE: If they ask to continue a hearing date and there's no reason why continuing that hearing date harms me, I pretty much have to not oppose it, even if I would personally like to get it done and over with.

Defense counsel is like, always able to oppose any motions like that, because their ethical obligations are entirely different. They have to represent their client vigorously, I have to represent 'the people', which means I'm also, at least in some part, representing the defendant in a weird way. I am held to a higher ethical standard.

To be clear, I don't really have a huge issue with this. Prosecutors -should- be held to a higher standard. The power of the state is very strong and we should be held to a higher standard because we go and ruin someone's life sometimes. Sometimes a motherfucker's life needs ruining, but if we're gonna do it we better do it right, and better not pull any bullshit. Defense counsel's obligation is just to oppose us. If some shithead gets off, its not the same level of damage as an improvident or unethical prosecution. Its the same reason why discovery in a criminal case is like, 99% of the time the prosecution turning everything over and getting nothing from the defense. Its fine, its like this for a reason.

But goddamn some defense lawyers use that to be big fuckin assholes about everything in unnecessary ways. I've encountered defense counsel that are extremely ethical and don't throw dogshit at the wall trying to bambooze the court... And I've had defense counsel that file every fucking motion and bullshit under the sun, oppose everything i say, Batson challenge every juror i strike, etc.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

I've said it before and I'll say it again if you can stand PPP's voice I seriously question your intelligence. The CIA uses recordings of that fat retards voice to torture terrorists. Also, they get like 50% of everything they talk about wrong.

bruh if you can't understand why our wife is just as bad as balldoboy there's no hope for you. Maybe your mommy was also a pilled out whore sorry for you bro.
Also we have absolutely zero proof that balldoboy was chief instigator but keep stating your headcannon as fact

You’re quite the edgy one, with your all-or-nothing opinions, huh?
Well, I understand that some people might disagree with me or like different things without me immediately questioning their intelligence.

I don’t even like PPP or Kayla, but I think being confrontational like you are sounds exactly like Nick.

 

[AnOminous]

One funny factoid is that, Defense Lawyers, god love them, basically have no ethical standards and do shit like this all the time.

D/C has made me angrier than any prosecutor has.

Except maybe that unethical moron Binger.

Frankly despite having higher required ethical standards on paper, I think prosecutors are just as bad or worse in actual practice (nothing personal). And yes I have a bias in favor of defense lawyers, as slimy as they are, but their ethical standards are to be entirely loyal to the client and, short of actually breaking RPCs or the law, their job is to get the best possible result for a single person.

Prosecutors, on paper, are supposed to be more concerned with justice and the good of society (in actuality they are more concerned with a high win rate and their reputation).

And yes, I'm aware people cross the aisle in both directions every day.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

You’re quite the edgy one, with your all-or-nothing opinions, huh?
Well, I understand that some people might disagree with me or like different things without me immediately questioning their intelligence.

I don’t even like PPP or Kayla, but I think being confrontational like you are sounds exactly like Nick.

I don't like PPP because he is a fat retard simple ass.
I don't like our wife because she allowed herself to become a crackwhore and abused her kids simple ass.
Bite me faggot.

 

[parsnip]

LAWYER FIGHT!!!

Fight fight fight fight fight fight fight fight

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Cuntguarding is back in fashion tonight our whore wife and steel toed whore did nuffin wrong it was all balldoboy who influenced them with his narcissistic super powers

 

[DemsBNutz]

LAWYER FIGHT!!!

Fight fight fight fight fight fight fight fight

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1oz3-Qe4ss