Debate @Hollywood Hulk Hogan about why banning porn is retarded

Personally, I'd be okay if lolicon anime was regulated, but that's just me.
Yeah you would. Egg crusher.
You have small dick energy lol
Why were you imagining child molestation? Let's start there.
It's pretty lazy to dupe people into a thread by falsely linking one of the sites most notorious users to your own frivolous debate thread. Did you get banned from the women hate thread or something?
It's pretty lazy that you're unable to read a thread OP. Where's the "dupe" exactly?
My name appears as the original poster and I explain the context behind the creation of the thread.

Hollywood Hulk Hogan said he'd be happy to tell women here they're retarded for wanting to ban pornography.
Seeing as he has never once shied away from a debate before I fail to see the problem.
If he doesn't want to participate, I can't force him.
Others seem to be willing to discuss the topic so why not let it continue?

If you don't want to join in the discussion, then leave the thread.
 
hum as artist try ban it in few form art and hard lines for both blured quiet bit more to light does this fail under congresscal law or fedral ageinty laws at sec both. be haddle diffent one has teeth will other become more toothless as yr goes on. body and nutiy thay find way make it like japan on porn law or if not wosres make gray zones of thing call part fast make black markets get worth on lot probems. to people.
Not if producing and distributing an unloicenced porn film sends jackbooted government thugs to your studio.
Pornography is bad for all involved in it, less the producer. It is the exploitation of love and the natural instinct to reproduce. It generates profit at the expense of the subject and the consumer in the form of time and loss of attachment. I don't think it can be banned realistically, but the widespread acceptance and normalization of it has had horrific consequences for my generation.
A lot of regulation of porn should be done at the studio side too. Make it illegal to make porn without a long set of arduous restrictions on what can be filmed, who can film it, how it can be filmed, etc. and ensure a lot of the money goes to help porn stars transition out of the industry and help people with porn addiction (just like the tobacco industry is required to do). This would probably kill the scuzzy, exploitative industry as it exists today and your new porn industry would be weirdo exhibitionists shooting loicenced videos of them having sex. If porn is to exist, it should portray only healthy relationships and should depict normal female bodies, if leaning toward a realistically achievable goal (i.e. athletes). No half-starved models, no women who look like they're 12, no giant fake tits, no fat chicks.

I'm not sure if gay porn or lesbian porn should be entirely banned or regulated in the same way. A lot of the problem with the gay community isn't their sex acts, but their culture, and as we see with the disgusting, degenerate porn that predominates today, porn can play a role in reshaping culture.
 
Its retarded cause the term Adult Website/porn sites is purposely kept vague so that websites despite not being pornographic but mature conversations regarding people would be affected. KF has images of OF prostitutes that could be considered pornographic content but KF isn't a porn site. The thought experiment would be better off arguing how you ban pornography without implementing a system that can be used to attack KF and other adult websites like it.
Capt2ure.PNG
 
Its retarded cause the term Adult Website/porn sites is purposely kept vague so that websites despite not being pornographic but mature conversations regarding people would be affected. KF has images of OF prostitutes that could be considered pornographic content but KF isn't a porn site. The thought experiment would be better off arguing how you ban pornography without implementing a system that can be used to attack KF and other adult websites like it.
View attachment 6338570
You take out the producers.
 
Who are the producers?
The ones who make fucking porn. It doesn't matter if it's a big company or some slag with her brick filming her dirty crotch.
Pass a law you can't make any of that shit and enforced it with big fat fines and jail time, even if some horny retards are doing it in private, but their shit gets leaked.
 
I fail to see why someone should be arrested or fined cause they sent a spicy video to their lover.
Because porn is a massive fucking problem in society that involves human trafficking, child abuse, drugs and suicide, and if some fat bitch wants to show her fat cunt to her fat nigger boyfriend, she should do that shit privately in person instead of using her fucking hacked Google Drive.
 
Because porn is a massive fucking problem in society that involves human trafficking, child abuse, drugs and suicide
The people who commit those act would then move everything underground making it harder to get the people it's abusing out of there, personally just forcing every site like that host it use the .xxx domain so that LEO can archive said content and take those people to trial rather than making them better cover their tracks and hide what they're doing to their victims.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Hweeks
The people who commit those act would then move everything underground
Good. That's where porn belongs. In the gutter.
making it harder to get the people it's abusing out of there
Shit tier logic.
Let's keep porn easily accessible, because else wise it will be harder to help all those poor porn addicts. Get da fuck outta here.
personally just forcing every site like that host it use the .xxx domain so that LEO can archive said content and take those people to trial rather than making them better cover their tracks
Even more shit tier logic.
and hide what they're doing to their victims.
Top tier shit logic.

My friend, you're a retard.
You make no sensible points and you're a bitch.
 
poor porn addicts
Who cares about their suffering.
involves human trafficking, child abuse, drugs and suicide
When these are the people who need the help.
Even more shit tier logic.
That LEO should do their job and punish people who break the law?
Most crime is still committed 'underground' despite existing laws.
This does not stop the enforcement of laws.
Yeah I know the feel but we're talking about helping the people being hurt by it, if they move their stuff to hidden websites where you need to know the secret handshake, would it be easier or harder to examine and see if they match descriptions for open Human trafficking and/or Child abuse cases? Websites are already compelled by law to report if people are using the platform for criminal content and the ones who exclusively use TOR for such content are not going to cooperate, Pornhub and the like can and will be compelled to cooperate, that's why you don't want it going exclusively underground.
 
content and the ones who exclusively use TOR for such content are not going to cooperate,
CSAM producers work exclusively underground and do not cooperate with law enforcement.
Neither did the Silk Road.

Countries that are currently further restricting the sale of nicotine/tobacco products are seeing these products go underground.
Your argument is essentially "we can never stop it, so we shouldn't try".
This is not logic.
 
Who cares about their suffering.
They themselves should and if instead of watching porn they'd educate themselves on what a fucking life destroying scumfect the industry is, maybe they'd care more.
When these are the people who need the help.
And allowing the porn industry to stay public helps them in about no way at all.
That LEO should do their job and punish people who break the law?
You first have to have a law to enforce.
Yeah I know the feel but we're talking about helping the people being hurt by it, if they move their stuff to hidden websites where you need to know the secret handshake, would it be easier or harder to examine and see if they match descriptions for open Human trafficking and/or Child abuse cases?
Retard, the mere fact that they have to keep shit underground already give precedent to illegal shenanigans. Being left out in the open does not.
Websites are already compelled by law to report if people are using the platform for criminal content
Retard, there is a distinct difference between quantity and capability. The more porn is allowed to fester publicly, the more shit is there to scour through, disabling the law enforcement apparatus.
But if that shit is in the gutter, the law can easily handle that shit no matter how obscure the secret handshake would be.
and the ones who exclusively use TOR for such content are not going to cooperate,
Nobody gives a fuck if they cooperate or not. Porn isn't bitcoin, it's something you have to put in physical effort to produce and that shit leaves traces. And even if there would be some top secret AI anime porn baron who only works digital, you can still go after retailers and shut them down, be they tor or not.
Pornhub and the like can and will be compelled to cooperate, that's why you don't want it going exclusively underground.
You stupid fucking brain dead retard. For pornhub to comply with this shit would mean the end of their business. They'd close shop and go underground and STILL you could go after them, because their operator names and shit would be on a list already.
 
Wasn't this thread about porn? Now people are talking about CSAM? I thought Epstein would've demonstrated the people in power really don't really care. They only do enough to keep it from seeping into the mainstream awareness. While the Youtube guys attempt to catch the bottom feeders, occasionally you see the articles hinting it's a massive worldwide multibillion dollar industry. Some officials have said it now makes more than the drug trade. But it's simply something the average person probably wouldn't ever want to imagine, because it would break their worldview. Anyone arguing about regular porn? They don't even know what's going on in the world. 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: CEO of Pickles
You first have to have a law to enforce.
You mean like human trafficking laws and CSAM Laws?
CSAM producers work exclusively underground and do not cooperate with law enforcement.
Yes, that is my point. Pornhub by being a LEGAL REGISTERED CORPORATION are by law forced to work with US government, when people uploaded the illegal stuff they cooperate with LEO and take it down and evidence is given. In a perfect world yeah I know but we've already established laws about this shit, muh kids argument is just an excuse lazy parents use, computers and phones come with parental settings already installed and they never bother to use them. We've already got the means to stop all of this but there are certain (((Forces))) at play that prevent it, Epstein owned the Island but there were a lot of guests in his black book that still occupy levels of government. Would you trust them to make the laws regarding this?
 
Back