US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[Michael Wade]

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4845429-dr-phil-interviews-trump-rfk-jr/

https://x.com/DrPhil/status/1827220551393333499

View attachment 6341763

That's the third time Joe Rogan has lost the pot of gold. To Dr phil of all people!

 

[whogoesthere]

I'm starting to wonder if we're literally looking at a scenario where our governments are literally controlled by invaders who are coordinating a Jihadist infiltration, so that when it's time the powers can order them to genocide all the native populations of each country.

Its been mentioned a few times on the more conspiritard forums I on. Of course the majority would never stand for it, it would be halted within an instant, with "one love" and "hope not hate" scrawled on a sign. That always wins.

 

[Betonhaus]

Its been mentioned a few times on the more conspiritard forums I on. Of course the majority would never stand for it, it would be halted within an instant, with "one love" and "hope not hate" scrawled on a sign. That always wins.

hah, no. but i strongly suspect there is a strong disconnect between what the invaders think will happen, and what will happen. Even if they managed to kill or imprison 90% of the rest of the world's population, there will still be 10% survivors who will be hell-bent on revenge and retaliation, with maybe 0.1% capable of executing it. There is no corner of the earth that they can hide in where not even one survivor can hunt them down and hurt them, and any empire they build will collapse and fall within a century.

That's the best case scenario where they have full control of the world's weaponry and information and attack everywhere at once. More likely they assume that China and Russia will watch from the sidelines while they decimate Europe, resisting the temptation to take lands during the chaos. Or maybe they just plan to do mass destabilization with little regard of the blowback.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

What you're seeing there is Stewart having an "oh my God, my party is full of corrupt retards, isn't it?" moment. Looks like the Obama era is truly over.

Stewart has correctly realized the Democrat party is full of corrupt retards ever since Pelosi accomplished jack shit after taking back Congress in '06.
He's just skittish about pointing out how the emperor is naked and getting mean tweets about it directed at him, which is why shitlibs had to pretend Trevor Noah was remotely funny for a few years.

That's not what you're seeing.

He's pulling a Bill Maher. Maher's job is to keep people who think they're too smart to be preached to in the Cathedral. He pokes fun at the woke, but then leads people to the voting booth where they vote for the exact same people enabling the woke.

Stewart is acting as a pressure release valve for people who are starting to get tired of how bad the DNC is right now. They'll laugh at his jokes about it, think "yeah, the preacher agrees with me" and then go back to voting for Kamala like good choir children.

The alternative is an actual outsider poking that hole in the narrative -- and an uncontrolled escape route is a dangerous thing indeed.

 

[Bunkerhousing]

You may have gotten this answer already but Asmon have the whole speech, Asmon says very little.

 

[Jade Philosophies]

Why can’t the US have a SINGLE politician as honest and ballsy as this Polish dude?

https://youtube.com/shorts/lSN7IeHBIsA

View attachment 6341758

You've never heard of Valentina Gomez then? She makes that guy look like a hardcore SJW!

https://x.com/ValentinaForUSA

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

Trump - old school dem
RFK Jr - old school dem
Biden - Left
Kamala - Far left

Who in America is right-wing anymore? It isn't Trump or RFK Jr, so the calls of 'right-wing' violence are big dumb. The right-wing is now 90's dems because America has shifted so far left. Britain is the same as well.

 

[mlanguishi]

Who in America is right-wing anymore? It isn't Trump or RFK Jr, so the calls of 'right-wing' violence are big dumb. The right-wing is now 90's dems because America has shifted so far left. Britain is the same as well.

Can Britain support free speech or a 2nd amendment or anti-invasion? At this point anyone that does so is 'right-wing' to me. And for now that's good enough.

 

[Coptakhenaten]

All I'm saying is this about Tulsi: During the 2022 Midterms, she actually went to bat for some MAGA candidates. Helped campaign for them too.

She's been literally placed on some "list" by the Biden and Harris Administration. People like Hilary Clinton and Mitt Romney have called her a Russian asset who deserves to be tried for treason. Translation: the Deep State wants her dead.

I know that people on the right argue whether she's trustworthy or not ... But considering the enemies she has made in recent years, I personally believe that she's over the target more than a lot of people give her credit.

I like Gabbard, I know on some issues, mostly guns and environment she's horrendous, but the dooming here about her are aggravating. It's like they didn't notice her until she ran in 2020.

Gabbard was effectively a bernie-bro. Keep in mind not all of them were in just because they were lazy college students who wanted gibs. I was pro-Trump even in 2016 but still liked Bernie (Before he cucked to BLM and sold out to Clinton) and would have still supported for him over another Bush if that was how the general elections went. She just wanted the system flipped upside down because the neoliberal order had clearly failed. Her solutions sucked, but she always wanted the broken system fixed because it's an objective failure. Also her foreign policy was consistently anti-interventionist and that hasn't changed in 8 years.

Gabbard was already questioning the Democrats as early as 2015 or 2016, when she was criticizing Obama's foreign policy. She was one of the few Democrats to actually condemn Trump's bombings of Syria in 2017 and 2018 which the MSM and Democrats' all 180'd and fellated Trump for doing. In spite of this, she was also one of the few democrats to be fair (Even if extremely harsh) on Trump during his term. When Trump was impeached in 2020, she was the only democrat to vote present because she understood this would weaponize impeachments over at worst a minor infraction (Which she admittedly believed Trump was culpable of).

It was through 2020-2021 that her stances on social policies became more conservative; there's a story of her talking to some democratic voters who felt disgusted by Beto's constant virtue signalling and faux Spanish and she agreed with them. Also she was the only democrat raising the alarm bell about how shady and corrupt mass mail-in voting and ballot harvesting was. 2021 redpilled her on the tranny shit. She has been fiercely against it ever since.

As for her WEF Connections? I cannot find the post but a person here pointed out that the WEF has a benefits program for "indigenous locations" like Hawaii. If she had any loyalty to the WEF, it was primarily because it benefitted her state with all the various funds given. Also she has since then denounced the WEF on various occasions and doesn't even have her name in the young leadership program anymore.

I am not saying she is le based conservative. As it stands she is still a leftist progressive when it comes to economics, guns, and the environment. But she has consistently shifted more and more rightward on various issues from government corruption, gender and race politics, and diplomacy. Furthermore, unlike people as left wing as her like the Squad, she is willing to talk with center right and right wing figures like Tucker Carlson. That is a world of difference from Cortez refusing to debate Shapiro "because that's cat calling." It shows she's willing to compromise and work with the right, something rare in the left. That's why she's valuable to the Trump campaign much like RFK. Just keep her away from the EPA and ATF and she's fine.

 

[Bunkerhousing]

okay I see it now. But seriously guys we can’t let Trump near the nuclear codes.

Who are near them now?

You can't even answer this right now.

 

[Betonhaus]

Trump - old school dem
RFK Jr - old school dem
Biden - Left
Kamala - Far left

Who in America is right-wing anymore? It isn't Trump or RFK Jr, so the calls of 'right-wing' violence are big dumb. The right-wing is now 90's dems because America has shifted so far left. Britain is the same as well.

Here's the thing, you are calling them 90's Dems for a reason. The meanings of left and right wing changed.
The Democrats are the current real right wing by 90's standards, the racial politics and sexual rights thing is merely window dressing.

 

[0713]

I don’t often critique the appearances of other women, but besides being a hardcore Leftist (I read her online campaign manifesto & it would make Karl Marx blush) Tulsi has bad skin and bad teeth.

You're either a jealous chick or a homosexual.
She's literally super hot and her teeth are cute. Her skin is more than fine for her age.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

Here's the thing, you are calling them 90's Dems for a reason. The meanings of left and right wing changed.
The Democrats are the current real right wing by 90's standards, the racial politics and sexual rights thing is merely window dressing.

The meanings have changed but it doesn't mean the politics haven't. We no longer get a say on gay marraige, gay adoption or trans shit. That argument is done and dusted and put to bed. Why? Because "banning gay marriage would be unpopular", despite 20 years of evidence proving the original naysayers correct. The NPC's have been fully brainwashed.

I'm starting to wonder if we're literally looking at a scenario where our governments are literally controlled by invaders who are coordinating a Jihadist infiltration, so that when it's time the powers can order them to genocide all the native populations of each country.

This is what's happening, without a shred of drama, irony or tinfoil involved. A holy Jihad was called on the west 20 years ago, the muslims laid out their plans in the open, they weren't even shy. Some fat paki was giving demonstrations at the worlds largest open air mosque; London, back in the early 2000's.

YMMV and the tactics will differ country to country, but the first sign of an invasion in the UK will be the poisoning of the food supply on a Friday and Saturday night - that's when most fighting age Brits go out to town, get pissed up and finish the night with a kebab made by abdul.
Once the majority of those fighting age lads are chocking up the hospitals with severe food poisoning, or worse, the invasion and attack can begin. The armed forces will be incapacitated due to how many will be ill, likewise the fire and police services. Women coppers and ambulence drivers/nurses will be too busy tending to the ill to fight back or do anything.
The rest of the country will lock themselves in their homes and hope and pray Akhmed doesn't come and machete them to death.
Those who try and flee will be caught in roadblocks on motorways and be killed in their cars.

Hitler started his campaign and six weeks later France had surrendered and the British were pushed back. Six weeks to mobilise an army and travel by train until one of the largest allies surrendered. How long would it take modern, paki-infested Britain to surrender after the call to arms and slaughter started? Two weeks?

In America it will be different; you have a bigger country to travel across, more time for the rural parts to organise militias and bunker down with weapons. Your supplies will be cut off and the inner-cities will be a blood-bath, especially if the muslim can convince the negro to turn on the whites. Your conflict will be more protracted, with waves of enemies flooding in from the south and North. Your country will, in metropolitan areas, fall to civil war and confusion, cut off from the counties, states and nationally isolated while Europe is in chaos and tatters.

The west would fall in a year or so. That's without interference from China or Russia, who could come up the arse of the muslims, wiping them out and taking Europe for themselves, ala 1944.

 

[Dog-O-Tron 5000v5.0]

A second Sirhan Sirhan will strike the Kennedys. 2 weeks.

CIA Goon 1: "Activate S3"
CIA Goon 2: "What? You mean?!"
CIA Goon 1: "Yes. Sirhan Sirhan Sirhan!"

Which isn't entirely out of the realm of possibility because:

RFK Jr isn't just dropping out nor is he just endorsing Trump, he's going to be part of Trump's government. So a vote for Trump is a vote for RFK Jr, just not as President.

RFK getting actual power in a Trump Cabinet is a good possibility that scares the fuck out of Globalists, corporations, Big Pharma, and the Deep State. He never had a chance at being President. If had been Trump's VP, he would have been a ribbon-cutter. Shit just got real.

Note: since he has dropped out, he will lose his SS protection.

I had a quote here about someone talking about his voice, but the fucking forums UI jumped me into it and erased who it was from and it was 20 pages back, so... But basically one interesting thing is despite how he sounds he can talk for hours no problem.

Reading the whole day of this thread yesterday was interesting. I've said before I was on the fence about RFK because I wanted to like him and he had good ideas, but did some things that turned me off and Trump was still clearly better. You read this thread a few days ago, and everybody trashed him. But once people watched his whole speech and heard his ideas, it was pages and pages of gushing over him.

Dude has a lot of good points. Hopefully more people hear them and Trump can make good use of him in the Cabinet. RFK with a mandate from Trump, who doesn't care about The Swamp or The Rules could upend Washington. This could remake our country.

 

[0713]

Note: since he has dropped out, he will lose his SS protection.

Technically he isn't dropping out. He was explicit about this on his speech. I forget the exact word he used but I think it was something like he is only "suspending" his campaign. He's only removing his name from battleground states, which helps Trump.

 

[BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny]

Trump - old school dem
RFK Jr - old school dem
Biden - Left
Kamala - Far left

Who in America is right-wing anymore? It isn't Trump or RFK Jr, so the calls of 'right-wing' violence are big dumb. The right-wing is now 90's dems because America has shifted so far left. Britain is the same as well.

The open boarders neocons instantly sold out their actual conservative principles and joined forces with the left to try and destroy Trump the he moment he was elected. If you want a right-wing party though, the Mises Caucus of the Libertarian party would be a good bet if they would just split from the gay Libertarians and join the GOP.

 

[Coptakhenaten]

The open boarders neocons instantly sold out their actual conservative principles and joined forces with the left to try and destroy Trump the he moment he was elected. If you want a right-wing party though, the Mises Caucus of the Libertarian party would be a good bet if they would just split from the gay Libertarians and join the GOP.

Most Mises Caucus people are voting for Trump it seems thankfully. They are more of the Rothbardian-Hoppean "libertarianism is nothing without conservativism" type and can't stand weedbro types

 

[Betonhaus]

The meanings have changed but it doesn't mean the politics haven't. We no longer get a say on gay marraige, gay adoption or trans shit. That argument is done and dusted and put to bed. Why? Because "banning gay marriage would be unpopular", despite 20 years of evidence proving the original naysayers correct. The NPC's have been fully brainwashed.

in the past, you could get fired from your job or cancelled from politics by coming out as gay.
Nowadays you can get fired and cancelled by saying you don't like gays, let alone be uncomfortable with transwoman teaching your children weird things.

This is the old political compass:


And this is the new political compass:


generally "left" and "right" is merely a way to define who has power and who doesn't, and how that power is used.

The people who protest and fight the system are only able to do so because they have the blessing from those in power. The power could neuter their protests in an instant if they chose to. It's not libertarian if your "libertarian" values are completely in line with the politics of the party, and you expect the power of the authority to enforce your libertarian values on others.

 

[Celebrate Nite]

Carl's Giants fan videos were KINO.

KINO, I SAY!

Real talk. Them having to keep doing superbowl segments because the giants kept winning was the funniest shit on the planet.

 

[BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny]

Reaction poll- Which spot would you give RFK JR will get in the Trump Administration?
- head of the FDA
- CIA director
- Head of Health and Human Services
- Attorney General (eta: didn't know politisperg react was banned on this board)
- head of the EPA
- Department of Education

Other reaction - Write in something else