Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Let's not forget the first nanny who seems to have quit rather suddenly. What are the odds that Nick tried to involve her in some of their degenerate shit? Sad part is I think she was the nanny for some years, she's seen most of these kids grow up. Can't be easy to leave the kiddos behind knowing how Nick and Kayla lived.

A twofold problem. The nanny likely reached her limit with 3 drunken and drugged people and the moods that go along with it.

The nanny leaving is also what resulted in the child neglect. I'd be willing to bet the nanny was feeding the kids and washing their clothes.

They had the nanny for years before Nick started streaming, according to Nick himself. He and Kayla have been inept parents with scheduling, cleaning, washing, and transport for years.

I heard it means "dick and balls"

Only for Balldo cucks who can't hold it up anymore.

Remember, she's charged with possession, not just using drugs.

Drug use in the States is not a crime. Possession and Sale are the criminals acts.

Apparently someone on X tweeted out to call the judge.
Mn has no law I can find on intimidating a judge, the section 609.48 through 609.5151 titled "Crimes against administration of justice" do not list a similar crime except Threats of violence, which I don't think it applicable here.

Who? All offense intended, this is a retarded post that starts a rumour that has no way of being verified or researched short of searching all of Twitter.

What does hearsay really mean? Is it just unverified things April said?

If they can't be used against nick unless she's used as a witness then just call her as a witness.

The confession may have been obtained in violation of the 5th amendment, and thus it may be legally useless.

I asked that - they can’t call her as a witness as she has a right not to self incriminate, which presumably her testimony would do.

Unless she accepts a deal in return for testifying, it’s not happening. Based on the filing, her lawyer thinks the basis and evidence for the charges is weak (which it probably is to be fair), so they want to see if it can be dropped before considering a deal.

Others suggested that she was only slapped with a charge so that the court could order her out of the house and make getting the kids back to Nick and Kayla more reasonable.

Someone else pointed out the self-incrimination part, but what I don't quite understand is why her statements made on body cam can't be admitted based on a cop saying, "yea, she said those things".

It means that they cannot play the video without calling April as a witness so Nick's counsel can ask questions about it. Thr Court said that the admissibility would need to be determined before trial, but tbe prosecution short-circuited it by saying they really didn't plan to use it.

Hearsay is an out of court statement made that asserts the truth of a matter. There are limited exceptions, but in general you cannot have something be testified to without someone there to confront about it. A video of what she said without April present is taking away the right to challenge her on what she said. If you can have a witness repeat what they said in court, it is preferred to having a video tape of them saying it

How would you like someone bringing in evidence (e.g. video or written statements) that you killed, raped, and ate babies? This person lives in the next town, but you can't call them in to grill them on it, and all the jury and court hear is that you are a piece of shite?

 

[Humble Architect]

So, I was thinking as I watched the latest new; just how many people has baldo fucked over?

Kayla is debatable (whether she pushed him or vice versa, depending what you believe)
Vic (guys life is fucked)
Drexel (it's coming, somethings hiding there)
April and Aaron Imholte
His kids
His parents
Every single member of his church...(gotta be double digits)

That's a large body count. You combine that with the money he's wasted. The drug tests, housing for his kids, the cops and there salaries and paying all the court officials.

Nick Reikata is literally the human version a festering malignancy in his impact on society.

Nick is the apex nigger is what you’re saying, he’s a bigger parasite than the welfare leeches and hood rats, the final form of the genus niggus subspecies.

 

[Cimmerian Kang]

As for her at FNT, she'll be out. The viewers really don't like her as she's a) not funny and b) knows fuck all about the topics. She'll be booted just as Nina Infinity was and just as the HeelvsBabyface twat just has been.

Az said he left because he doesn't want to do a 5+ hour show that starts at 11 PM anymore. He has at least three other shows on his channel and Gary's channel that they still do together weekly. Gary plays weird power games with the rotation on all of his shows but I don't think Az actually got booted. Is there really not a dedicated Gary thread? There is something off about that guy.

I await Nick killing himself and Imholt getting arrested, both due this week.

If Nick ever kills himself it will be with drugs and accidentally. Narcissists never an hero.

 

[Swole McPole]

At some level Nick likely thinks that “I fought the mighty government and lost” Is a bigger win for him than pussying out and taking the plea.

Smoking rocks in the hot sun,
I moved in a whore and the law won,
I moved in a whore and the law won,
I spent my money on Randazza now I've got none,
I moved in a whore and the law won,
I moved in a whore and the law won.

I'm bored with Kayla and she feels so sad,
Her ruined body's no longer fun,
But she's the best girl that I ever had,
I moved in a whore and the law won,
I moved in a whore and the law won.

I had an ounce of coke and a six gun,
For my kids and my whore, but the law come,
It's surely not illegal to be having fun?
With my bull and my whore on the coke run
I gave my nine year old a tiny line,
Because the kid was feeling sad,
It cheers me up, I thought it might stop the whine,
But then the government lied and the law won,
The government lied and the law won.

 

[Oxyjen]

It sucks because I’m grateful for the group that did go, but seeing as all of the most important details were missed by them, and that the stuttering mess of white’s presentation wasn’t properly acknowledged kinda makes me wonder what they were really paying attention to.

Nick was effectively given the license to go on that gloat stream solely because of the bad reporting. I really hope any future not broadcast hearings have more scrutiny

I think this is being a little harsh on the observers - they knew we were getting a transcript, they knew Null would have an undercover lawyer there to do the legal understandings. So they were there to add colour and describe the scene, which they did.

Even with the transcript it’s not immediately obvious who’s L the April footage situation is. It sounds like the prosecution isn’t trying to include it, so, sure, nicks lawyer didn’t achieve that. But is that because it’s obvious to the prosecution that the cops fucked up?

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Even with the transcript it’s not immediately obvious who’s L the April footage situation is. It sounds like the prosecution isn’t trying to include it, so, sure, nicks lawyer didn’t achieve that. But is that because it’s obvious to the prosecution that the cops fucked up?

You don't want to bring on a witness who you don't know what they'll say. April, even on a good day, is likely unreliable. They might agree to a plea deal contingent on her testimony, and then day of she just goes off the rails to try to save her Lord Balldo master.

I would doubt they would bring the charges back against her if they thought there was an issue with it (that may be why they dropped the charges day of, though), unless they found other evidence that would prove useful. But who knows, it wouldn't be the first time a prosecutor leaned on someone to try to gain favorable testimony against someone else. It's just... usually a user against a dealer, not a whore against a Balldoman.

 

[Long-time Lurker]

Someone else pointed out the self-incrimination part, but what I don't quite understand is why her statements made on body cam can't be admitted based on a cop saying, "yea, she said those things".

Heresay. My non-lawyer understanding of it is below.

At trial, evidence should be the best evidence available within reason. Consider a statement made by a person. The best evidence that the statement is true is that person coming into court, swearing in, and making the statement.

If you are trying to prove that the person made a statement, sure - video is great proof. So yes, if you want to prove April said something and it is on video, sure. If you want to prove what she said was true, generally she needs to come into court and swear that she's telling the truth.

There are exceptions, such as "they wouldn't say that if it wasn't true about themself because of how bad it is". Think about Vito calling himself a pedophile. No reasonable person would admit to being a pedophile unless they were confessing the truth out of guilt. As such, Null can reasonably believe (and say that) Vito is a pedophile.

Since we are talking about Nick's case, the prosecution might not be able to use the "admitting this would be bad" exception because that only applies to a person talking about themself, not someone else. I am less sure how this works than the other stuff.

 

[Cimmerian Kang]

Even with the transcript it’s not immediately obvious who’s L the April footage situation is. It sounds like the prosecution isn’t trying to include it, so, sure, nicks lawyer didn’t achieve that. But is that because it’s obvious to the prosecution that the cops fucked up?

It's not really an L for the prosecution. They can probably still get her to testify and make her comments admissible if they ever feel like they need her for some reason, but the cost/benefit for putting her on the stand isn't great. She's as much of a coke-snorting, baldo-taking, child-neglecting blight on the community as everyone else in the compound. Her testimony isn't going to be regarded as credible. It is a bad idea to hang the credibility of your case on a crack head/prostitute.
They don't need her statements. What is she going to say that incriminates Nick in a way that the cocaine, the piss and patch tests, the hair follicle test, etc. do not already incriminate him in an airtight way? They have the cocaine, they have the hair follicle test of the 8 year old, they have the guns stored with the cocaine, they have the coke scale and the packaging for resale. They have Rackets' piss and patch test results. They will have crime scene photos and expert witness testimony to validate the test results to the jury.
So if you are the prosecution: what do you gain from putting the unreliable crack whore on the stand besides a risk of her incriminating herself on cross and casting doubt on your case against Rackets?
Rackets is fucked. He did it and he got caught. He had drugs in a safe that only he had access to. They found the drugs with a valid warrant. They found that his youngest kid had been exposed to or given the drugs. If they can't scrap the warrant on probable cause or a constitutional rights violation done during its application or execution then he's done (protip: they can't, he's fucked). He's going to lose. His council needs to convince him to take whatever plea he can get. At this point the prosecutors should take it to trial, fuck his token defense into the dirt, and go for maximum sentencing based on his clear unrepentance. They won't, but they should.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

So if you are the prosecution: what do you gain from putting the unreliable crack whore on the stand besides a risk of her incriminating herself on cross and casting doubt on your case against Rackets?

Most critically, you have Balldoman's admission to the officer that he and his wife sleep in the master bedroom, where the drugs and one of the guns were found. You have Kayla and April in that bedroom, where the drugs were found.

 

[daffodils]

Who? All offense intended, this is a retarded post that starts a rumour that has no way of being verified or researched short of searching all of Twitter.

PPP said that "Rekieta and the crew" (Ralph) were posting the judge's phone number on Telegram and that he (PPP) helped Aaron Imholte to get that information to Pomplun.

Aaron confirms:

 

[repentance]

Belt and braces is a common British idiom not limited to lawyers at all. The point that's generally being conveyed is that somebody is taking any extra steps necessary to ensure a particular outcome. Things like redundancy or overdoing aren't generally implied by the term. If anything, it might suggest an overabundance of caution, but generally it just means doing whatever it takes to achieve your goal.

It's used in British oncology a lot in reference to whatever treatments follow an initial treatment method. While not strictly speaking necessary, those additional treatments are aimed at shoring up the success of initial treatment.

 

[RodgerDodger]

I guess, best case, but still very weak and not going to work: he could make the argument that the cop's training on magically knowing when someone is on cocaine and drunk and not just really drunk or on a legal stimulant and drunk is bullshit.
In all fairness that training probably is bullshit, cops are not human drug tests that can intuit the exact substances raging through your bloodstream. The state will probably uphold that the training is good because it is certified and all the cops have it so it must be good.
So then you have to pull up the behavioral criteria Nick would have to meet to be considered drunk and on illegal stimulants and not just drunk according to the cop's training. You have to show ways that the cop didn't comply with his training. And maybe you can make that argument: Nick is hardly energized, he's incoherent, he's nodding off on camera during his goon sesh, etc.
If the cop disregarded/didn't comply with the training that he claimed that he used to apply for the warrant you have a decent argument at reckless disregard for the truth for his application re: the cokestream. Getting passed-out sloppy on liquor on your own property is... not great parenting, and inadvisable, but it is not cause for the police to break down your door and go through your shit looking for cocaine.
I'm surprised we didn't see a pass at this yet, it's pretty close to the standard DWI attorney playbook re: breathalyzers. When was the cop last trained on how to do it right, when was it calibrated, is it all in complience with the dept. standards, etc. My guess is that you have to show Nick in a bad light and he won't tolerate that. We'll probably see it now. Hi Nick!

Emergency Responders get good at recognizing what they are dealing with. It's not magic drug vision. Put you can rationally, reasonably and easily gage whether they are on broad categories such as stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, etc with an extremely high degree of accuracy. It's a learned skill. But it is a skill. Cops do it. Health Care Providers do it.

Be honest even you can tell when somebody is tripping balls. And you probably have a 50/50 chance of correctly guessing what. It's just a game of watch the patient/perp and see what he's doing.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Ralph lives in a shack with no address in Tijuana. I'm pretty sure he's home now for the Gamer Gate 10th Anniversary with reformed homosexual/reformed jew Milo Yannopolis (who will not show up). They might throw out a warrant but they aren't going hog hunting in Mexico for some xweets about Aaron not having enough dinero and balls to enter the ring with the Ralphamale on the one and only KEEEEEULstream, baby.

>Ralph is totally in hiding, stalker child
>go down to Merida
>donde esta cerdito monstruo and shake zanny bottle
>locals gather their torches and pitchforks
>Ralph is captured and caged in about 10 minutes
>fly back after local children poke Ralph with sticks

Ralph is very public about his vices and you could probably narrow down where he gets booze or xannies from in about ten minutes. He’s probably known to local cops.

 

[Dimension Sniper]

Emergency Responders get good at recognizing what they are dealing with. It's not magic drug vision. Put you can rationally, reasonably and easily gage whether they are on broad categories such as stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, etc with an extremely high degree of accuracy. It's a learned skill. But it is a skill. Cops do it. Health Care Providers do it.

Be honest even you can tell when somebody is tripping balls. And you probably have a 50/50 chance of correctly guessing what. It's just a game of watch the patient/perp and see what he's doing.

If you work in a restaurant for any appreciable length of time you will also acquire this skill. Line cooks adore their Substances.

I think the important thing to keep in mind too is that the warrant isn’t based entirely on any one piece of evidence. You’ve got the report from the pastor combined with this livestream of the guy in question being very clearly fucked up. One or the other might not have been enough to justify a search, but the combination of both meets the burden for probable cause.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Keanu talking about Kayla's nude photo. To her mother.

There's nudes of the mom out there too. Some things you can just sense.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Who? All offense intended, this is a retarded post that starts a rumour that has no way of being verified or researched short of searching all of Twitter.

It's already been found. It's being discussed in detail in the separate thread for the criminal case and there's not one but two community happenings post about it.

The Rekieta fan who put out the call to action has deleted their tweet and protected their account. Juju favorably retweeted it before it was deleted.

 

[200MB]

There's nudes of the mom out there too. Some things you can just sense.

 

[Melty Butter]

we know from Hedonism II, swinging, nude beaches, underwear parties and Nick's odd lecture on the difference between voyeurism and exhibitionism that he and Kayla like to get naked in front of other people

It's surprising that no sex tape or "revenge porn" has surfaced yet. I’m curious if Romaine and Ricardo are aware of the case.

Don't normally watch Nate's content, didn't know he's also covering Nick stuff outside of the initial arrest. Good production value and editing.

The video was good. His credibility is strong, given his extensive experience as a NYC police officer, followed by roles as a prosecution and defense attorney. Additionally, it's notable that Nate has steadily grown to 523K subscribers, while LawyerYouKnow, who hasn’t addressed the Nick situation, has 419K subscribers. Both were featured on Nick's major trial streams initially.

If he takes it to trial and defends to the end, he might actually end up with jail time.

He can't be that deluded, can he?

Nick will never take a plea deal.

I still think he will plea out. Since the arrest, Nick has suggested (using some clever legal language) that a first-time drug possession offender usually avoids jail time. That usually means a plea deal.

Who? All offense intended, this is a retarded post that starts a rumour that has no way of being verified or researched short of searching all of Twitter.

I agree, but this moment of online stupidity—Aaron's agreement to "fight" a supporter of Nick—further undermines Aaron's credibility and intentions as a witness for the prosecution. His actions, already questionable due to STMS and ex-wife legal issues, could be exploited by the defense to complicate the case if it proceeds to trial.

 

[TexOffender]

Kurt gonna go over the transcript.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

PPP said that "Rekieta and the crew" (Ralph) were posting the judge's phone number on Telegram and that he (PPP) helped Aaron Imholte to get that information to Pomplun.

Aaron confirms:

It's one thing to assist like this behind the scenes but to then lede your superchat dono liveshow with that topic doesn't strike me as very helpful to one's credibility.