Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[Windows XP Home Edition]

I know relatively rational people with basic common sense who are on the woke end. However, that all goes out the window when it comes to trans ideology and gender shit. They are absolutely engrossed in tranny propaganda and believe JK Rowling is literally the Anti-Christ because she doesn't agree with the crowd on everything. One acquaintance of mine who identifies as a "queer pansexual" explained to me that Rowling is bad because she supports lesbian TERF groups that exclude trans women." And that lesbians don't deserve a safe space from straight men in frocks pretending to be lesbians because it's "bigoted" and "transphobic". Are troons who have their own exclusionary spaces "bigoted" too?


It's quite amusing to ask them questions along the lines of "Why do you hate JK Rowling?", "What did Rowling do?", and "Why is she anti-Trans?" and watch them struggle to come up with something coherent.

 

[SnergenFlergen]

off-topic, but it's always struck me as evolutionarily interesting that mammalian testes have to be outside the body, since they are so vulnerable, as opposed to some types of animals who have internal testes, and also so necessary.

I don't want to shit up the thread, so I'll spoiler my thoughts on this:

Spoiler: Sperg

I've always thought that men having prominent and extremely sensitive external genitalia was Mother Nature's way of offsetting the significant gulf between male and female strength. Men effectively have a large off switch located between their legs, which means that even a 5'1'' woman who weighs 150 pounds soaking wet can bring a 300 lb bodybuilder to his knees for a not insignificant amount of time with a single well-placed kick.

I'm not sure how this works from an evolutionary standpoint (I suppose vulnerable child-bearers being able to protect themselves from violent men does have it's advantages in terms of species propagation and is a biological incentive for men to behave themselves), but I'm just spitballing.

 

[Raging Capybara]

I know relatively rational people with basic common sense

One acquaintance of mine who identifies as a "queer pansexual"

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

I've always thought that men having prominent and extremely sensitive external genitalia was Mother Nature's way

Mother nature should have given women the abilty to produce poison or spit acid to defend themselves. But we live in Clown world so we have men pretending to be women and screeching about wizard book lady instead.

 

[Mao Hao Hao]

I don't want to shit up the thread, so I'll spoiler my thoughts on this:

Spoiler: Sperg

I've always thought that men having prominent and extremely sensitive external genitalia was Mother Nature's way of offsetting the significant gulf between male and female strength. Men effectively have a large off switch located between their legs, which means that a 5'1'' woman who weighs 150 pounds soaking wet can bring a 300 lb bodybuilder to his knees for a not insignificant amount of time with a single well-placed kick.

I'm not sure how this works from an evolutionary standpoint (I suppose vulnerable child-bearers being able to protect themselves from violent men does have it's advantages in terms of species propagation and natural selection, and is a biological incentive for men to behave themselves), but I'm just spitballing.

It's mostly due to having them be able to control temperature better to both increase sperm storage capacity and also decrease the chances of sperm mutations, and increasing fertility, since they can be kept at optimum temperatures. Also possibly as some sort of sexual decoration.
Not every mammal has fully external testicles, or ones that can descend/retract, such as whales and dolphins, elephants, seals and so on.
Humans only have them purely because apes do too, so they stuck around through evolution.

 

[Eternal Gopnik]

reddit and troons (same thing) have this whole rationale where it's actual a totally neutral word in the UK, so it's fine and less offensive to call JK one, as she's a brit, than it would be to an american. As a bong, this is not true at all and I don't hear it often here. But they already know that.

That's fascinating. By the same logic, calling a nigger a nigger is perfectly fine because they call each other that all the time.

 

[Dr. Butt]

While I suspect J.K. probably has had a bit of work done (as most wealthy older women in the public eye have), I also think that a lot of it can be chalked down to her just naturally ageing well. You'll note that those pictures of her the likes of India Willoughby are posting are from a VERY long time ago.

She's also got "face gains" from weight loss.

Mother nature should have given women the abilty to produce poison or spit acid to defend themselves.

Why don't the SRS Mengeles work on this instead???

 

[Marvin]

I've always thought that men having prominent and extremely sensitive external genitalia was Mother Nature's way of offsetting the significant gulf between male and female strength. Men effectively have a large off switch located between their legs, which means that even a 5'1'' woman who weighs 150 pounds soaking wet can bring a 300 lb bodybuilder to his knees for a not insignificant amount of time with a single well-placed kick.

I'm not sure how this works from an evolutionary standpoint (I suppose vulnerable child-bearers being able to protect themselves from violent men does have it's advantages in terms of species propagation and is a biological incentive for men to behave themselves), but I'm just spitballing.

Nah, it's not really that tidy.

Evolutionary pressures don't really care about rape being a part of the process. Look at ducks and similar species.

It's really just that having the higher metabolism that comes with higher core temperature enables certain advantages but that requires relocating the little swimmers outside of the body core because chemically it can't work that way.

 

[lamppost]

Spoiler: Stupid

View attachment 6343418

reddit and troons (same thing) have this whole rationale where it's actual a totally neutral word in the UK, so it's fine and less offensive to call JK one, as she's a brit, than it would be to an american. As a bong, this is not true at all and I don't hear it often here. But they already know that.

Yeah I've seen the Resetera threads lol.

Calling your friend down the pub a 'silly cunt' is different to calling the barmaid a cunt because she spilled your beer.

"You see, 'I'll rape that TERF cunt to death with my girl cock' is a term of endearment in the UK, we say it all the time! XD"

EDIT: @Miriam Margoyles I'm Norf FC, cunt is used all the time here, just not to our parents and in-laws

 

[Slideshow Bill]

They really do think that the Harry Potter rights are something that can just be taken away from her

"Well Mommy, what if I take away your toys, huh?! I'm gonna flush your phone. See how you like not playing Candy Crush, bitch!"
These people are like petulant children.

 

[JCnGGd32]

Yeah I've seen the Resetera threads lol.

Calling your friend down the pub a 'silly cunt' is different to calling the barmaid a cunt because she spilled your beer.

"You see, 'I'll rape that TERF cunt to death with my girl cock' is a term of endearment in the UK, we say it all the time! XD"

EDIT: @Miriam Margoyles I'm Norf FC, cunt is used all the time here, just not to our parents and in-laws

It’s (obviously) also autistic black and white thinking patterns. It’s either okay or not. They can’t understand nuance.

Plus they’re just too self-centred and self-unaware to care how it comes across to everyone else.

 

[chocolatebargalileo]

Welp, now that left wingers hate Rowling's guts, who's going to be the next "Stan Lee" of the book world?

 

[Sourceress]

Welp, now that left wingers hate Rowling's guts, who's going to be the next "Stan Lee" of the book world?

So far they've tried to crown Neil Gaiman (turned out to be a serial rapist and abuser), Stephen King (wrote pedo shit in one of his books), and George RR Martin (also wrote pedo shit in his books, hasn't written anything significant in a long time)... last I heard they were still shilling Rick Riordan, but given that his books are only transparently woke (and contain some honestly pretty obvious racism) it's only a matter of time before they have to move on from him, too.

Shockingly they're not having a whole lot of luck finding a replacement for the author of the number one best and most impactful children's and young adult book series in the entire world. Who would've thought?

Funny how many of their "picks" have turned out to be men who are pedos and rapists, though. I can take a stab in the dark at why that is...

 

[Whereismymind]

a

 

[Rudolf's Friend]

Crossover from the Kidd Bandit thread, but he wants Rowling to suffer as much as that tranny faggot Hunter Schafer has.

Kidd Bandit for those of you who don't know is a tranny wrestler who started out as an anime-obsessed wrestler who did OnlyFans content of himself crossdressing and was a particularly shitty wrestler before he got injured and his fans convinced him to troon out.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

suffer as much as that tranny faggot Hunter Schafer has.

When did this disgusting gay tranny monster ever suffer?

 

[Rudolf's Friend]

When did this disgusting gay tranny monster ever suffer?

According to these troons, Schafer suffered by having to deal with all those "transphobic trolls" who say that he will never be a real woman on twitter. In reality the only suffering he has had is all of the chemicals and shit he has had to put on himself to even try to look even somewhat passable and that's before all the filters and angles he uses, and then there's also the rotpocket (Assuming he even got that shit). Only reason I know about Schafer is because /leftypol/faggots constantly promote the faggot on /tv/ trying to act like "Trans women can pass" before someone shows them an unflattering angle of him.

 

[Procopius]

According to these troons, Schafer suffered by having to deal with all those "transphobic trolls" who say that he will never be a real woman on twitter. In reality the only suffering he has had is all of the chemicals and shit he has had to put on himself to even try to look even somewhat passable and that's before all the filters and angles he uses, and then there's also the rotpocket (Assuming he even got that shit).

I suspect he's not had the rot pocket installed, as he seems to suffer from the Jack Green problem of having "not much to work with". And even ignoring the world's smallest budgie being smuggled, it's remarkable just how male his body looks.

 

[Tragon Dirtle]

I don't know where to find it, but Hunter Schafer was the one who posted the buffalo bill style journal pages that suggested pretty disturbing thought patterns. I think they've been memoryholed because they freaked a lot of fans out, but they also might not have been serious because he's into horror or something. If serious I can see him having a lot of mental health 'struggles'.

random pics of him instead because why not

 

[Gondolindrim]

Welp, now that left wingers hate Rowling's guts, who's going to be the next "Stan Lee" of the book world?

If GRRM ever finishes Winds of Winter he'll be the next choice.