Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[SMOCAINE 4]

How did his attorney miss that though? There's surely no way they submitted that without looking at what they were given? Is he representing himself? This raises so many questions that I'm legitimately confused.

Others have said something similar in the thread, but you sometimes you wind up with a client who’s just fucked. Some dickhead walks in with some dirty pond water and moldy lemons, gives 10k upfront, and tells you to try and make lemonade.

Also, you generally do not know how bad the case is until you’ve already established that relationship. Balldo could definitely make a compelling case to some defense attorney who is only vaguely familiar with the details, money notwithstanding.

 

[dustnight]

I just happened to be searching for the last time used the word 'monogamous' out of curiosity and stumbled across this gem of Nick joking about putting a little extra coco powder on his ice cream.

 

[Pitbull Victim]

Hmm, I wonder why they picked this time in particular to clip Nick's stream?

Ok, yeah, that makes sense.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Why is it impossible? It wasn't removed from Rekieta's YT channel until the next day IIRC and is still on Rekieta's Odysee channel right now.

It is unclear. If the warrant is written linearly, it seems Pomplum learned about the Cokestream AFTER it was taken down. However the state's response today seems to imply that they had the original video.

It might take a while to clear this up.

 

[Journoscum]

It appears that Nick's argument that "it's not the same video" is so retarded that the state didn't get it and they thought he meant detective Plimplum only watched the clip (which is also argued in Nick's motion if I remember correctly, so they are not wrong, that motion was such a mess). Very good. As dumb as Nick's argument is, it wasn't even explained in his filing, so no wonder the state is confused.

Can't wait for Nick's response.

"They are ARGUING the wrong THING. If you're paying ATTENTION this whole thing should scare YOU."

 

[Sheryl Nome]

It is unclear. If the warrant is written linearly, it seems Pomplum learned about the Cokestream AFTER it was taken down. However the state's response today seems to imply that they had the original video.

It might take a while to clear this up.

View attachment 6364913

The state has a re-upload, but nicks motion seems to allege they just had the clip.

It's all moot, the re-upload is substantially the same video and pomplun didn't lie so this shouldn't trigger franks

 

[Captain Manning]

Rekieta superchatted the guy like $10 or whatever a couple weeks or months ago, he probably expected him to be nice to him and his polycule FOREVER after that that.

Speaking from personal experience... yes, that checks out.

It seems to say that he has watched it, but that seems impossible. It could be a technological illiteracy on behalf of the police. I hope Nick hones in on this issue and does not get the court to understand it, and it ends up not mattering.

There's some things that are still unclear from the Prosecution's response, but my position on this is wherever Pomplun ultimately got his evidence copy (Cog, Nick's Odyssey, whatever), I am convinced that what he saw was a true and accurate recording on Nick's cokestream, and in no way is Nick being railroaded with falsehoods. The cokestream happened. Nick is a cokehead. You don't even need to be a trained law enforcement officer to reach that conclusion. Everybody here saw it and called it when it happened.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

The state has a re-upload, but nicks motion seems to allege they just had the clip.

It's all moot, the re-upload is substantially the same video and pomplun didn't lie so this shouldn't trigger franks

For PC, the caselaw cited by the state is that 'negligence' doe snot fulfill the Franks requirement anyway. Even the judge seems to understand this as he saw it as more appropriate for a motion in limine.

 

[Canard]

Has Nick even argued with some video comparison that video was somehow modified like adding something to it or editing it more than re-encoding and slapping water mark? I mean like substantially tell what exactly was altered?

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Come on Nick, get liquored up and go live to clear all this up for us buddy! You don't have anything left to lose at this point!

 

[Procrastinhater]

I'm kinda curious when it all started. I mean, Kayla has 5 children, but does Nick? Maybe he has 3.

Juat curious if this all started say 2-3 years ago, or intensified then, or if it was always a thing.

I've heard a theory Balldos "worst day ever" was the day he found out some or all of his kids aren't his.
Maybe the 9 year old is the only one that is and thats why she's "his favorite".
Maybe she's the one who isn't and thats why he gave her coke?
I'm just speculating.
So many questions, none of which would be getting asked if Rekieta could have just kept up his respectable LARP and been able to keep his low iQ animal urges behind closed doors.

I know Nick would regularly have a gay furry porn artist named Bonitis on his night show for a while who complained a few times about being injured by dog bites he received while "helping" (fucking) dogs and that Nick had interacted with him IRL and received commissioned artwork from him. That was >6 years ago. I'm pretty sure we are only at the tip of the iceberg re: Nick degeneracy and that this would go back way further if we dug more.

Talking about the animal urges of Lord Balldo I hope that isn't why the Pug is incontinent and always looks terrified when he picks it up.
I wouldn't put anything past Balldo when he's drunk and coked up and in his sleazy AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed mood.

He wouldn't even remember the next morning either.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

For PC, the caselaw cited by the state is that 'negligence' doe snot fulfill the Franks requirement anyway. Even the judge seems to understand this as he saw it as more appropriate for a motion in limine.

Exactly. A boomer detective seeing a re-upload and representing that he saw the video is not a lie.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

It is unclear. If the warrant is written linearly, it seems Pomplum learned about the Cokestream AFTER it was taken down. However the state's response today seems to imply that they had the original video.

It might take a while to clear this up.

View attachment 6364913

I think if you use "has" instead of "had" in your second highlighted section it makes sense. Bc "had" was already awkward there, and bc it said "since," I had (lol) read it as most likely "this stream was taken down between when Aaron mentioned it and today," not that he couldn't watch it bc it was taken down before he got to it. ...which then makes sense with "your affiant was able to review [the now-privated] video."

Eta: I have a lot of experience reading and challenging confusing grammar that 50 educated and invested people have already signed off on without realizing that the final language might be inexact or not quite crystal-clear to an outside reader.

This filing goes aways to clarifying minor (immaterial!) linguistic confusions, and if it comes up again I'm sure it will be fully clarified. And if I were a betting woman, I'd bet that it will not go well for Nick.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I've heard a theory Balldos "worst day ever" was the day he found out some or all of his kids aren't his.

This is super retarded. They all resemble Nick, undeniably.

 

[BaddestSeagull]

It is unclear. If the warrant is written linearly, it seems Pomplum learned about the Cokestream AFTER it was taken down. However the state's response today seems to imply that they had the original video.

But Nick's motion seems to be saying that their video (I'm assuming the full video they uploaded and Nick's side downloaded at the beginning of July) is the one with a watermark and "not the same video because compression". It's possible the state doesn't realize this is not directly from Nick's channel, they just go "what do you mean retard, it's your full stream, nothing is added or cut, it's full length, you're dumb" and they are not wrong.

 

[MechanicusAdmin]

Oh boy, the seething will be next level now. I'm on the edge of my seat here. Fire up that stream Nicholas, have a drink or three.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

Tough break for Balldo. The only thing that can clear Nick Rekieta’s name is if he takes the witness stand and clears it all up and explain to the jury how there’s a government conspiracy against him to deny him his rights. A good competent practicing lawyer with intelligence can pull it off. Alas Nick Rekieta is retarded, not very smart, and a non practicing lawyer so he will never take the witness stand and prove once and for all he’s innocent.

 

[DSP for president 2032]

It's this line for me. The entire thing is consistent with what Imholte said. In the era before everyone recorded themselves committing crimes and uploaded the footage to the internet, they gave out search warrants for a lot less than this. They have Imholte saying Nick's a cokehead, and footage that screams Nick's a cokehead. The warrant is going to hold up, or I'll be very surprised!

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Has Nick even argued with some video comparison that video was somehow modified like adding something to it or editing it more than re-encoding and slapping water mark? I mean like substantially tell what exactly was altered?

No. He alleged it was 'edited' or 'altered' because of the 'watermark' and 'branding' in the written motion, but at the Omnibus, his lawyer did not offer much more than the assertion it was NOT the original because it had be taken off the channel. He has not clarified what 'edits' were present and the State's current response seems to be taking a scattershot approach to guess and address what might be the alleged 'edits'.

It seems like the ambiguity about 'edited video' will be a bone of contention, but I got the sense the judge does not care about it because until you get to trial, they already have enough for probable cause because as a real lawyer has said:

Exactly. A boomer detective seeing a re-upload and representing that he saw the video is not a lie.

 

[Canard]

Tough break for Balldo. The only thing that can clear Nick Rekieta’s name is if he takes the witness stand and clears it all up and explain to the jury how there’s a government conspiracy against him to deny him his rights. A good competent practicing lawyer with intelligence can pull it off. Alas Nick Rekieta is retarded, not very smart, and a non practicing lawyer so he will never take the witness stand and prove once and for all he’s innocent.

Maybe he goes for jury nullification on basis that coke should not be illegal and it is entirely fine to be crazy cokehead with your drugged out wife while having a mistress in the house... And the CPS did not find any issues with his kids so coke could not have been problem for him.