Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Captain Manning]

I may be getting a little in my cups already this long-weekend-eve, but Nick's formal legal positions thus far are embarrassing.

Well, what did you expect? He's a shit lawyer, who hired a shit lawyer, who is the protege of another shit lawyer. He's also guilty as fuck. All he's got is embarrassing shit to throw against the wall.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Nick is the one that has to be precise though. He has to go "here is where the officer is lying based on this."

He didn't

He also has to say "here is exactly why Aaron hates me" and he failed to do that as well.

 

[Journoscum]

Much like Hulk Hogan, Lord Balldo has NEVER told a lie

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Well, what did you expect? He's a shit lawyer, who hired a shit lawyer, who is the protege of another shit lawyer. He's also guilty as fuck. All he's got is embarrassing shit to throw against the wall.

Oh, I know; I just like rubbing it in and reminding Nick of the contempt his betters have for him.

 

[Long-time Lurker]

It appears that Nick's argument that "it's not the same video" is so retarded that the state didn't get it and they thought he meant detective Plimplum only watched the clip (which is also argued in Nick's motion if I remember correctly, so they are not wrong, that motion was such a mess). Very good.

Can't wait for Nick's response.

"You fools! By failing to address that it was a reupload you have automatically lost! I cannot be defeated!!" -- Nick Rekieta, depicted below

The state has a re-upload, but nicks motion seems to allege they just had the clip.

It's all moot, the re-upload is substantially the same video and pomplun didn't lie so this shouldn't trigger franks

^ This, if we're being serious.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I posted this in the LawTube thread, but Rekieta's lawyer does not appear to know how to spell the word "suppress" based on the file name of his motion from earlier in the month. The embedded document title has the non-word "supress" instead.

The PDF metadata confirms that the file creator was Nick's lawyer, meaning that the Barneswalker doesn't appear to know how to spell "Suppress"!

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I posted this in the LawTube thread, but Rekieta's lawyer does not appear to know how to spell the word "suppress" based on the file name of his motion from earlier in the month. The embedded document title has the non-word "supress" instead.



View attachment 6365339
View attachment 6365340

EPCI 200 IQ lawyer move! Nick claims he never tried to 'suppress' anything! He only tried to 'supress' it! Checkmate, Kiwifags!

 

[Captain Manning]

He also has to say "here is exactly why Aaron hates me" and he failed to do that as well.

"Aaron hates me because I was doing lines of coke off his (then) wife's ass."
.
.
.
"Wait no, strike that! STRIKE THAT!"

 

[Procrastinhater]

Well, what did you expect? He's a shit lawyer, who hired a shit lawyer, who is the protege of another shit lawyer. He's also guilty as fuck. All he's got is embarrassing shit to throw against the wall.

All Nicks arguments have been reduced to pedantic word games and disingenuous assertions. Its got a reek of desperation about it. You're right, he knows he's fucked and his only hope is this faggy Hail Mary at nuking the warrant because without that he's got no defence for having an oz of cocaine in his house.

 

[TexOffender]

So what's Nicks next play?

They aren't his drugs? The cops brought them in and planted them? The field tests don't work? Aaron made stuff up?

 

[yydszmiteg2]

All Nicks arguments have been reduced to pedantic word games and disingenuous assertions. Its got a reek of desperation about it. You're right, he knows he's fucked and his only hope is this faggy Hail Mary at nuking the warrant because without that he's got no defence for having an oz of cocaine in his house.

Classic narc move to play silly word games. As the saying goes. "If you can't hammer the facts, hammer the definitions. If you can't hammer definitions, hammer coke with your 9 year old".

 

[Apis Mellifica]

Balldobros...what the fuck???? I thought we were winning? Nick masterfully removed the video (UM ASKSHULLY HE JUST MADE IT PRIVATE, PRUDE!) before those stupid pigs could review it...and even if they did there was nothing illegal on it, which is why Nick had it taken down to begin with. How did that piece of shit cop, who can't even remember his Denny's order, find a copy? Why didn't Ethan Ralph's deployment in the area keep that stupid fuck Aaron quiet like it was supposed to? Even tattling on him to the cops backfired, now everyone knows he WAS a swinger cuckold freak. Now the stupid court that doubles as a vaginal distillery is alogging Nick and shooting down his true and honest motion to 'supress' evidence, it's FUNNY and WEIRD how he has the (second)best constitutional lawyer coke-money could buy and he's still getting reamed. I don't get it balldobros...we had it in the bag...

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

So what's Nicks next play?

They aren't his drugs? The cops brought them in and planted them? The field tests don't work? Aaron made stuff up?

Ethan Ralph needs a roomate?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

What I think the major own in this entire filing is that they basically say: "Lord Balldo wants a Franks hearing, but he did not provide evidence to prove the points he is trying to make. The defendant has no clue what the Franks test actually is, when it is required and what they have to present to even get to it. Just pretending malfeasance is at work without actually providing any proof is laughable

Nick was seething on Twitter for days over the incompetence of all those practicing lawyers around the world who do not understand the genius of his argument and that the Franks test and this hearing would be the death of this case against him.

I expect Nick to show up on several streams to lawsplain to his "friends" that milk him for content and super chats how idiotic everyone is and why his argument will prevail despite never presenting any proof for of his previous accusations.

[EDIT] Clarity and formatting.

 

[TwinPeaksEnjoyer]

So what's Nicks next play?

They aren't his drugs? The cops brought them in and planted them? The field tests don't work? Aaron made stuff up?

He going to throw April or Kayla under the bus.

 

[USAroXX]

Rekieta's junkie logic never fails to amaze.

 

[TexOffender]

He going to throw April or Kayla under the bus.

He can totally convince them that the court would go easier on them because they're women.

 

[Mr.Bucket]

One rather good thing from all of this is that it really points out which in lawtube are actual lawyers who care to accurately (to the best of their various abilities) describe the law no matter who is involved vs those who like to play pretend lawyer and just make bullshit stories up out of thin air.

 

[Jungle Strike]

One rather good thing from all of this is that it really points out which in lawtube are actual lawyers who care to accurately (to the best of their various abilities) describe the law no matter who is involved vs those who like to play pretend lawyer and just make bullshit stories up out of thin air.

...I agree...th-thank your for your faith in me.

 

[Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu]

One rather good thing from all of this is that it really points out which in lawtube are actual lawyers who care to accurately (to the best of their various abilities) describe the law no matter who is involved vs those who like to play pretend lawyer and just make bullshit stories up out of thin air.

2 that should never be taken seriously again.