- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
To me it's not really clear whether Rekieta and his lawyer LIED or whether the Barneswalker was so unbelievably sloppy in making his arguments that he failed to articulate what his issue was.So they had the entire video Pomplun disclosed to them and tried to pass off a lazy screengrab from cog's channel as the entire discovery?
Any ramifications for this type of fuckery?
One thing that's been established from how the Barneswalker described the watermark and examining Cog's video is that it was part of the YouTube user interface and not a watermark added by Cog prior to upload.
This means that the only way the full four-hour video would have a watermark on it is if the video was saved by screen recording a computer for over four hours. If it was downloaded through software tools like yt-dlp or websites or browser extensions providing similar functionality, the watermark would not be present and it would be effectively indistinguishable from the original broadcast (less any "muh ENCODING" issues)
Unfortunately, there is a Community Happenings post which implies otherwise which means probably a lot of misguided posts will flood the thread unless it is corrected.It's the prosecution's filing, not a Court decision.
Nick Rekieta's motion to dismiss evidence was laughed out of court in a rather sassy manner.