MrBeast / MrBeast6000 / James Stephen "Jimmy" Donaldson / Beast Philantropy / Beast Reacts / @mrbeast / - YouTube's golden goose, philantropist and the perfect braindead content for kids. Covered his tranny best friend grooming for years, promotes gambling for kids, fakes contest videos. Also known as Mr. Cease & Desist.

[Metamorpho]

Since DogPack Part 3 has been sent to Youtuber dev hell, and Part 4 feels like a limp dick follow-up to context we don't have yet, Ill finish my own wee Jimmy post: part 2. But first-
View attachment 6364113
Mark your calendars he scheduled a "Hi Me in 10 Years" video for next year, fingers crossed for a Chris mention. Its been a month, how will this shit show develop in an entire year.

When Jimmy ditched Giant Asian Sticker his channel went to shit.

 

[Sweet Musica]

Idk man, this shit was pretty fucking funny

I’m referring to his recent stand ups where he pretends to be black George Carlin.

 

[Local Farmer]

Please don't. He doesn't have to be making YouTube videos. He's made 150k for less than 6 months of total work and he's still broke, trying to become famous. We've watched him make one bad decision after another since we learned of his existence. Just imagine how much of an annoying fuckup he's been since he turned 18. He's played way too big of a part in his current predicament to justify pity.

I legit dislike him, if not outright hate him, and not that it changes anything but Jimmy probably hated/hates him too.

Honestly at this point I think this guy is only a month away from getting a thread on this site.

Jake Weddle- Former employee of Mr. beast/ Failed comedian/ Selflessly accept bribe money/ ended up in more debt after receiving 100k

 

[Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu]

we don't know what part 3 (4?) is about. it's possible that some (crucial) information is easy to link to a certain employee.
don't forget that it's no longer only Dawson. he has multiple people who worked at mrbeast giving him information. if you were Dawson and they get cold feet for whatever reason, you'd fuck them over?

besides that, how would you feel if you were someone giving information and changed your mind out of fear of being sued or whatever and got fucked over?

This. He said he has to run everything by his lawyers, the people who are sources, witnesses and victims and their attorneys.

The thought of him going scorched earth is wonderful but this has become a huge undertaking with lots of cogs.

I would hate for him, in his haste, to derail the whole thing, destroy his credibility or make a stupid move that enables Jimmy to have a actual case against him.

 

[Stanley Ipkiss]

I understand these are just hypothetical reasons you're proposing for the delay, even though I'm sure it's a combination of him waiting for a response from Jimmy (which he stated initially and has since realized was dumb) and wasting time on editing and probably adding another 30 mins of an unneeded testimony from another fame-hungry faggot. I'll answer them anyway.

we don't know what part 3 (4?) is about. it's possible that some (crucial) information is easy to link to a certain employee.

We don't need to know what it's about if no one will care in a week. Every day that he waits takes a big chunk out of the potential viewerbase.

If there is any link that can't be removed by blurring out some names or using a voice filter or something, then you risk exposing them regardless. I can't think of a way to remove this risk in 3 weeks that can't be done in 1 day max. It's an easy decision. Use the info or don't.

don't forget that it's no longer only Dawson. he has multiple people who worked at mrbeast giving him information. if you were Dawson and they get cold feet for whatever reason, you'd fuck them over?

I would do what he did for the others who got cold feet before part 1 and 2: Just not use their info and allude to their existence a la "I've received messages from numerous people saying xyz but they don't want to come forward for obvious reasons". He already did this in Part 2. Why would "fucking them over" even be on the table? Again use the info or don't. This decision shouldn't take this long to make.

besides that, how would you feel if you were someone giving information and changed your mind out of fear of being sued or whatever and got fucked over?

I'd be mad, but if the only options truly are between:
1. fuck my witnesses over by carelessly exposing their names
2. take a month to fail at removing all links to my witnesses and then release a video no one cares about anyway,

I would stop wasting mine and everyone's time and fuck off into the sunset. Part 1 and 2 have done a lot of damage already and it's not Dawson's job to save the world from the antichrist. Hell the threat of a lawsuit by the clearly evil wealthy guy is enough of an admission of guilt that Dogpack doesn't need to say anything else and no one would blame him for backing down.

Edit:
I'm not advocating for any kind of scorched earth release where he's just fills videos with screenshots with names visible or whatever. I said I would either:
1. Release it all in one video, in which case he can take a year for all anyone cares. Jimmy isn't going anywhere.

2. Cut out the fat if he's going to release it in parts. No need for jokes. No need for any content cop skits. Jake Weddle's entire interview did not need to be in part 2. Taking this long isn't going to help him reach more people. It's doing the opposite. The people actually waiting for part 4 at this point are people who already have a vested interest. Us, MrBeast's team and commentary Youtubers. And you know YT isn't going to promote a video criticizing their cash cow so it won't randomly pop up on any normie's recommended feed.

 

[RACISM]

Look at Elon Musk for instance or Fox News.

What the fuck does that have to do with stand up comedy you fucking retarded nigger? Shut the fuck up you literal ape.

 

[This ruined Sonic]

WTF is up with this weird trend of mama's boys being misogynistic towards other women? Is it like a psychological thing or something?

 

[Space Police]

What if Mr. Beast is, instead of the Antichrist, a charismatic alien commander sent to turn humans into warriors via persuasion while his mom weakens the human military from the inside? That would at least explain where he got all his money from in the beginning, and it makes more sense than him being the Antichrist because the Antichrist would be bringing peace to Israel and would appear in a very tumultuous time in history, and we're in a comparatively peaceful, stable period right now.

 

[This ruined Sonic]

Part 3 of DogPack's Mr Beast exposal series has been uploaded to youtube.

youtube | preservetube

View attachment 6358337

Apparently, Jimmy is collecting rapists like Pokémon. You have those who assault men, those who assault women and those who assault children all gathered in his company which is beginning to resemble a pedophile ring.

 

[orangecat]

WTF is up with this weird trend of mama's boys being misogynistic towards other women? Is it like a psychological thing or something?

I'm sure there are a ton of reasons but if his dad was potentially abusive (which is what I believe the mom claimed), I'm sure that would make Jimmy (consciously or not) lose respect for his mother and women in general. He could also be emulating his dad in that case. Not having a healthy male role model is also a bad idea, since he'll then turn to his buddies (aka pedo Chris) and the internet to find male role models instead. Surrounding himself with "the boys" and no women for his formative years could contribute. Being exposed to sex workers as a teen/in his twenties is another way to view women as sex objects instead of people (the employee didn't say who on the Beast crew slept with a prostitute but I'm sure Jimmy was at least aware of it). And there's a lot of factors I'm sure contributed.

All speculation, of course.

 

[Ghostse]

I know this is kinda offtopic but it's incredibly funny to me that you tl;dr'ed a one line sentence with a wall of text

the teal deer wall of text is the tl;dr of how peicemealing your expose` works the algorithm. The full information is long and spergy.

 

[highly regarded 420]

WTF is up with this weird trend of mama's boys being misogynistic towards other women? Is it like a psychological thing or something?

Mother's breast is best

 

[onkey]

I understand these are just hypothetical reasons you're proposing for the delay I'll answer them anyway. (I combined the first and last sentence but that is the idea right?)

correct, purely hypothetical because I don't know what has been going on over at beast HQ nor dawson or any of his sources. I try to base most of the stuff I post with real sources but sometimes you just have to speculate and throw out ideas.

even though I'm sure it's a combination of him waiting for a response from Jimmy (which he stated initially and has since realized was dumb) and wasting time on editing and probably adding another 30 mins of an unneeded testimony from another fame-hungry faggot

you're sure? based on what? got proof? that's rhetorical, I know what you mean

We don't need to know what it's about if no one will care in a week.

I would care and I would watch it. you would not? again, rhetorical, I know what you mean.

If there is any link that can't be removed by blurring out some names or using a voice filter or something, then you risk exposing them regardless.

the difference here is consensual exposure. i.e. them agreeing with him publicizing with the possibility of it being traced vs him just doing it regardless and them potentially, depending on if he tells them or not, having to lawyer up with or without notice, which is what you're suggesting and is just a dick fucking move.

they are possibly getting cold feet BECAUSE the information could be easily linkable. I probably should have put the "crucial" without the parentheses. crucial information is important. also if you break the trust of 1 of your sources, say goodbye to all of them. i don't get how you don't see this.

I would do what he did for the others who got cold feet before part 1 and 2: Just not use their info and allude to their existence a la "I've received messages from numerous people saying xyz but they don't want to come forward for obvious reasons".

that could still be traced down to a group of employees i.e. when did this occur, what is the allegation, whatever, which could bring people into the picture who leaked nothing, depending on how aggressive the beast is handling this. there are bigass lawyers in the picture. sure they won't get in trouble if they didn't do anything, but they would unnecessarily get dragged into this

He already did this in Part 2.

aight cool, but I remember him mentioning that every part would go deeper into things than the one before (I think it was in part 1 or the first interview he did).

first it was only jimmy, now it's his cousin, lacoya or whatever. I can see how a source can get cold feet the bigger this gets, can you not?.

Why would "fucking them over" even be on the table? Again use the info or don't. This decision shouldn't take this long to make.

I'd be mad, but if the only options truly are between:
1. fuck my witnesses over by carelessly exposing their names
2. take a month to fail at removing all links to my witnesses and then release a video no one cares about anyway,

I would stop wasting mine and everyone's time and fuck off into the sunset. Part 1 and 2 have done a lot of damage already and it's not Dawson's job to save the world from the antichrist. Hell the threat of a lawsuit by the clearly evil wealthy guy is enough of an admission of guilt that Dogpack doesn't need to say anything else and no one would blame him for backing down.

i mean, yeah from our point of view maybe? we don't know what he knows though. it's possible that without certain information there is no part 3. I think it's worthwhile to take the time it takes to get everything into place vs just putting a half-ass effort out there.

 

[I'm a Silly]

I can only wonder if he will run as President Donaldson or President Beast.

@Local Farmer w/r/t Dave Chappelle:
All his funny shit was disavowed when he chimped out and fucked off to Africa.

I'm sure there are a ton of reasons but if his dad was potentially abusive (which is what I believe the mom claimed), I'm sure that would make Jimmy (consciously or not) lose respect for his mother and women in general. He could also be emulating his dad in that case. Not having a healthy male role model is also a bad idea, since he'll then turn to his buddies (aka pedo Chris) and the internet to find male role models instead. Surrounding himself with "the boys" and no women for his formative years could contribute. Being exposed to sex workers as a teen/in his twenties is another way to view women as sex objects instead of people (the employee didn't say who on the Beast crew slept with a prostitute but I'm sure Jimmy was at least aware of it). And there's a lot of factors I'm sure contributed.

All speculation, of course.

The pattern is that boys who are abused or see their mothers abused will externalize and become abusers, and the opposite is true for girls. Jimmy is probably better off in the prison his mother runs.

 

[Stanley Ipkiss]

the difference here is consensual exposure. i.e. them agreeing with him publicizing with the possibility of it being traced vs him just doing it regardless and them potentially, depending on if he tells them or not, having to lawyer up with or without notice, which is what you're suggesting and is just a dick fucking move.

they are possibly getting cold feet BECAUSE the information could be easily linkable. I probably should have put the "crucial" without the parentheses. crucial information is important. also if you break the trust of 1 of your sources, say goodbye to all of them. i don't get how you don't see this.

I don't see where you got that I think he should screw anyone over. If I tell you that a guy with a gun pointed at a random stranger can either fire it or not, I'm not advocating that he fire it, but rather pointing out that the decision is very simple. Standing there and deliberating with his lawyer about whether he should or shouldn't fire it is a waste of everyone's time because we all know the consequences of either decision.

My point is that info linking back to the source is a given in this particular scenario, and this makes it a fairly quick decision on whether or not to use it. The right choice is obviously to discard it and move on to the next, not to waste time deliberating and risking putting them in danger anyway or the video flopping because you took too long.

that could still be traced down to a group of employees i.e. when did this occur, what is the allegation, whatever, which could bring people into the picture who leaked nothing, depending on how aggressive the beast is handling this. there are bigass lawyers in the picture. sure they won't get in trouble if they didn't do anything, but they would unnecessarily get dragged into this

So again this is a fairly quick decision. Use it or don't. It's either vague enough that no one is really at risk, or so sensitive that it could fuck innocent people over just by it being said on camera. Again I would just not use it, but I'm emphasizing that the decision is really that simple. This isn't worth going over multiple times with lawyers over weeks, and if it is, Dawson is way way out of his fucking depth here.

aight cool, but I remember him mentioning that every part would go deeper into things than the one before (I think it was in part 1 or the first interview he did).

first it was only jimmy, now it's his cousin, lacoya or whatever. I can see how a source can get cold feet the bigger this gets, can you not?.

Yes I can, and my response to that has not changed: do it or don't. In my head a source getting cold feet means I can't use their info. I dunno what it means to you and Dawson. I'm not gonna risk someone's safety/livelihood against their will for a small chance to take down a guy the police aren't willing to go after, BUT again I say, I can (as in I have the option to) either do it or not do it. This isn't worth weeks of deliberation unless some of that time is spent convincing them to go through with it (dick move), or wasting time trying to include the info in a way that doesn't somehow link back to them or innocent colleagues, because it 100% fucking will and they should all be prepared for that if they allow him to use their info. The choice lies with Dawson. Do it or don't, but be quick about it.

i mean, yeah from our point of view maybe? we don't know what he knows though. it's possible that without certain information there is no part 3. I think it's worthwhile to take the time it takes to get everything into place vs just putting a half-ass effort out there.

Not sure what you mean by "half-ass" but it doesn't apply to anything I've put forth in this thread. For the 3rd time, my stance is he should've either taken all the time he needed to release one complete video, or cut out all the useless stuff if he's going in parts so he can release it before we move on to Boogie's next fuckup. I used part 2 as an example of a video he has released that included many such useless parts.

Here's a question for you? Why do you speak as if there absolutely has to be a part 3? If protecting his sources means that there isn't enough for a video, why is that unacceptable in your eyes? My advice to him in that case would be to fuck off and live a normal life, not to spend weeks doing the job of the police so that he can get sued and possibly ruin the lives of multiple people including himself.

 

[Caesar]

People keep repeating this and it brimgs up an interesting property. Back in the TV era, he'd never be allowed on Children's TV again ...but nobody uses Youtube Kids (full of slop anyway) and nothing short of hard age gating his videos like big meanie channels is going to enforce anything.

Is YouTube Kids not a half dead project anyway? Like didn't they scrap the dedicated app for example. These platforms should be made to have way more kid sanitized versions of their platforms if they want to keep them. For all the noise about the new COPPA enforcement a few years ago, it mainly seemed to screw people out of ad revenue as they were no longer targeted and not much else.

 

[onkey]

I don't see where you got that I think he should screw anyone over. If I tell you that a guy with a gun pointed at a random stranger can either fire it or not, I'm not advocating that he fire it, but rather pointing out that the decision is very simple. Standing there and deliberating with his lawyer about whether he should or shouldn't fire it is a waste of everyone's time because we all know the consequences of either decision.

you're still not getting the point, there is no longer just 2 (or 3 involving the lawyer) people involved. seriously read that back, there's only 3 people involved in your scenario. no longer the case.

My point is that info linking back to the source is a given in this particular scenario, and this makes it a fairly quick decision on whether or not to use it. The right choice is obviously to discard it and move on to the next

yeah lemme just conjure up a source from my source mana pool. doesn't work like that.
there's a supposed narrative and you just can't keep on conjuring up sources whenever someone bails out. they have to present themselves. eventually you just run out of sources and end up with a shitty video if you only grab the lowest hanging fruit. not to mention vetting the new sources which also takes time.

So again this is a fairly quick decision.

for you, someone (like most of us) with no other context than what has been publicly announced or speculated.

Use it or don't. It's either vague enough that no one is really at risk, or so sensitive that it could fuck innocent people over just by it being said on camera. Again I would just not use it, but I'm emphasizing that the decision is really that simple. This isn't worth going over multiple times with lawyers over weeks, and if it is, Dawson is way way out of his fucking depth here.

reminds me of that trolley dillema somewhat tbh. would (you) be the one responsible to "fuck innocent people over just by it being said on camera"? would (you) pull it?

Yes I can, and my response to that has not changed: do it or don't. In my head a source getting cold feet means I can't use their info.

yet. I don't think you get how nuanced this has to be, we're talking about probably the biggest youtube personality today. also cold feet does not have to mean "i'm out" it can also mean i want to be sure of my livelihood before I go public with this. and the trigger to that can be many things, more people coming out, getting legal protection, etc.

It's either vague enough that no one is really at risk

how are you expecting anyone to take it seriously then? trust me bro.

or so sensitive that it could fuck innocent people over just by it being said on camera

again trolley dillema, would you pull it?

Again I would just not use it, but I'm emphasizing that the decision is really that simple.

so you wouldn't? but you are expecting him to?

personally I don't think anyone could expect how much these videos would blow up in such a short time. especially dawson's. the fact that he hasn't monetized them is admirable (though there is 1 rumor of him maybe eventually enabling it in one video of a former mrbeast empoyee. haven't looked into this yet but wanted to mention it)

This isn't worth going over multiple times with lawyers over weeks, and if it is, Dawson is way way out of his fucking depth here.

says you. why not? I mean what even is "this" that you're talking about? got sources, proof, whatever to back that up?

besides, he basically kickstarted this thing. of course he is in over his head bro that's why the videos are probably taking longer than expected. (even though I think that 2-3 weeks is not long at all but w/e, especially considering that there's probably new allegations coming out every day or w/e as more and more people starting to feel comfortable to speak up)

BJ investigates and her other channel's videos are also quality if you ask me, I can't stand her personality tbh, but she does her research. she only gets a fraction of views that dawson's videos got. is it that hard to believe he's a bit in over his head? he was an IDEATION guy, not an editor or whatever. (granted, as far as we know right now. I do remember him mentioning having a youtube channel besides the dogpack one so idk.)

Ideation refers to the process of generating ideas or concepts, particularly in a creative or brainstorming context. It involves coming up with new ideas, solutions, or approaches to a problem or challenge. Ideation is a critical part of many processes, such as design thinking, innovation, product development, marketing, and problem-solving.

I'm not gonna risk someone's safety/livelihood against their will for a small chance to take down a guy the police aren't willing to go after, BUT again I say, I can (as in I have the option to) either do it or not do it

dawson never said he wants to get jimmy arrested, iirc he only wanted for the mrbeast company to fix their shit and nothing more.

i'ma skip some shit now because I'm tired.

Not sure what you mean by "half-ass" but it doesn't apply to anything I've put forth in this thread.

yes it does

The right choice is obviously to discard it and move on to the next

again, eventually you run out of sources. you can't just conjure up a source. i don't see how I have to explain this any further tbh. if you just keep on moving to the "next" if there is any, you will end up with low hanging fruit. not to mention (again) the time it takes to vet a resource. we're not talking sesame street here, this is mrbeast, the biggest (?) youtuber around currenty employing a $2000 per hour lawyer firm.

For the 3rd time, my stance is he should've either taken all the time he needed to release one complete video

that's impossible because of new information coming out faster than he could probably process in a video. that would most likely take longer than a year.

also if you metaphorically look at that one video as a candle that one will burn out (quickly) and that's it. I think drip feeding is the correct approach. now if your short term dopamine addicted brain can't handle the time this takes I suggest you go watch some youtube shorts and just move on.

Here's a question for you? Why do you speak as if there absolutely has to be a part 3?

i mean, yeah from our point of view maybe? we don't know what he knows though. it's possible that without certain information there is no part 3.

i'm done. no hard feelings i love you goodbye

 

[Rum Wife]

Dogpack comment on Cam Nugget's latest video regarding the Locoya stuff. Sorry, not really sure how to properly archive a comment on a YouTube video.

Note the part about upcoming interviews. I think we're going to see bigger media coverage of this whole mess very soon.

 

[Eventide]

Dogpack comment on Cam Nugget's latest video regarding the Locoya stuff. Sorry, not really sure how to properly archive a comment on a YouTube video.

Note the part about upcoming interviews. I think we're going to see bigger media coverage of this whole mess very soon.

In Dogpack's recent video, he mentioned how he's been contacted by streaming services (perhaps the "Beast Games" Fyre Festival-style documentary rumors are true?) & major journalists. It wouldn't shock me if there's something substantial in the works.

 

[username1811]

Dave Chappelle is unfunny because he doesn’t write jokes, he just preaches at the audience for an hour. Rightoids love him because he makes fun of trannies, but he also thinks George Floyd is a martyr and thinks black men are America’s greatest victims. His job is to be a clown but he thinks himself higher than that.

He also chimped out and left his own massively popular show to flee to Africa for… reasons??? Then he realized that being a recluse in Africa won’t pay any bills and according to some reports he accrued massive amounts of debt by that point. He then came back and tried to do a redemption run on his career to varying degrees of success. But he will always be known as the dude that threw away millions of dollars and any good will with his fans because he had a tantrum and went full ape mode without any good reason or explanation.