State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[You Dun Boof’ed]

After the wicked succession of events over the past 3 months… It’s almost like Nick made a wish upon some kind of monkey’s paw that everyone would forget about the Montagraph lawsuit.

 

[YouDoNotHaveTheRight]

The inmates are going to love your underwear parties in prison Nick. :')

 

[AnOminous]

The days of being the Sunday School teaching trad father of five is over and can't be recovered once he pleads guilty to this and has to go on record admitting to being a cucked-out child-endangering cokehead.

He already admitted to the snitch part. And the cuck part. He literally admitted his wife cucked him to an irl chudjak in order to get his weird, cucked revenge. That's how much of a cucked faggot he is. He openly admitted, on the record, that he is a cuck and his wife gave nudes to another dude, presumably after getting fucked by him.

Nick Rekieta is a fucking CUCK
He's the biggest CUCK in the whole damn world
He's a stupid CUCK, he's a COKED-UP CUCK
He's a CUCK to all the boys and girls!

On Monday, he's a CUCK
On Tuesday, he's a CUCK
On Wednesday through Saturday, he's a CUCK
Then on Sunday, just to be different
He's a super King Kamehameha CUUUUUUUUUUCK!

But is is more strange than 'belts and suspenders' in a motion hearing?

Please don't make us go through this again and have to talk about how this expression often turns up in legal filings and is nothing unusual.

 

[thebigdream]

That poor guy. Nick's streams are unbearable.

"I never thought I'd cringe side by side with a fed."
"What about with a friend?"
"Aye, I could do that."

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Let's not mince words here. Nick and his lawyer outright lied about numerous matters of public record and that's just one.

And the judge isn't going to be inclined to give them a fucking inch

 

[Happy Little War Painter]

I might be reading this wrong, but in my understanding did Nick present to the court the slideshow with a few minutes of his stream with the audio muted as a way to try and trick the judge into agreeing with him? Completely oblivious/nefarious to the fact they have the full stream with audio?

 

[not william stenchever]

But I DESTROYED the evidence, judge child! That means you can't prosecute me and you certainly can't add more destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice charges! Enjoy prison!

Much like he destroyed his marriage. However, much like his marriage, the evidence and how it will be used against him is still extant in the legal realm.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

But is is more strange than 'belts and suspenders' in a motion hearing?

*belt [singular]!

Spoiler: I'm idle, yes

And for fun, here and here are why you shouldn't do it literally. Fashion don't:


Dear God, there's even a meme (but of course)

 

[Terrifik]

I hope to God you have a tech expert you will be needing to prove it either.
1. Youtube video
2. Cog video
3. Kiwifarms video
4. Rumble
5. Kino casino
6. Another youtubers
7. Dl??? Site for youtube downloads.
...
Good to know the cops are serious now.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I might be reading this wrong, but in my understanding did Nick present to the court the slideshow with a few minutes of his stream with the audio muted as a way to try and trick the judge into agreeing with him? Completely oblivious/nefarious to the fact they have the full stream with audio?

I think they are intentionally replying in this way to the Defendants motion, pointing out that it is not clear what they are trying to say, since the full video was provided by the state and no affidavit or testimony was given as proof to show where the video was altered.

If the Defense wants to have the video thrown out they will have to come out and say where they think the video was altered, with time stamps or finally come out and actually make the argument that "the video was not directly from Lord Balldos channels, so it is not admissable!!!!111111"

 

[demicolon]

Did he really thought they are that fucking dumb? Also it warms my heart to know they're losing patience for him.

 

[World in Scarlet]

Why did people think the clip/video that was talked about was originally from Cog?

I checked Nick's Odyssey and the duration of the original stream is 4:04, as stated by the prosecutor, so they're probably not referring to someone's coverage of the event.

link

The timestamp is great.

 

[AnOminous]

And the judge isn't going to be inclined to give them a fucking inch

It takes a literal pathological level of liar in your personality to lie about someone who knows you're lying and somehow expect your lie to take hold.

The judge in this case already knows Nick is lying. He already has the facts available to him that definitely prove that Nick is lying.

So what does Nick do?

He lies.

That's because he's a liar. And that's what liars do. They LIE!

The timestamp is great.

That's a perfect face for when you're a CUCK and you suddenly realize that also being a SNITCH involved admitting you're a CUCK, something you have adamantly denied despite obviously being a CUCK.

Nick is a CUCK. That's the face he made when he realized that he had, indeed, PERMANENTLY admitted to being a CUCKOLD.

That's what Nick is. He's a CUCK!

Dear God, there's even a meme (but of course)

This is a bunch of bullshit. If the situation actually does call for both suspenders and a belt, do both. That shit you posted is some propaganda. Do not be fooled. USE BOTH!
Whatever happens to Aaron Amhole, Nick is forever more a self-confessed CUCK!

 

[demicolon]

My theory is that Nick is going full on stupid because in the end his plan is to cop a plea.

My theory is that Nick is going full on stupid because he discovered party uppers 20 years too late and thinks he can be coked out of his mind every day without downsides.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

After watch Potentially Criminal's stream, I think I have finally figured just wtf Nick's lawyer was trying to say.

He is saying that Nick hid his video so the fact it's in evidence is a Brady violation as the cop would have needed a search warrant or whatever to get it and it wasn't presented in discovery. He just worded it so badly and didn't actually ask for an explanation so nobody knew wtf he meant.

He is basing this on the fact the cop didn't say where he got the video from. Of course, there is Odysee or the YouTube re-upload, but the cop doesn't say. So Nick's lawyer is defaulting to Brady violation. Jesus, that was hard to figure out.

All of the logo talk was literally about some clip the cop turned over in evidence. The clip is likely the one Aaron watched on his stream and his entire argument of watermark, etc, is based on that.

To be honest it looks like the prosecutor had no idea what Nick's lawyer was claiming. So I'd expect Nick’s lawyer to restate it on rebuttal.

Potentially Criminal is right: Nick's lawyer writes poorly and doesn't lay things out well.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

*belt [singular]!

Spoiler: I'm idle, yes

And for fun, here and here are why you shouldn't do it literally. Fashion don't:
View attachment 6366008

Dear God, there's even a meme (but of course)
View attachment 6366014

This is a good point. If someone had belts (plural) and suspenders, I'd be concerned they might have dementia.

 

[Not At All A Lizard]

Potentially Criminal is right: Nick's lawyer writes poorly and doesn't lay things out well.

To be fair to his attorney, he has absolutely nothing to work with in this case, and likely a client constantly screeching at how he wants things done. He's having to argue that a video that at worst was a direct complete copy of the original somehow can't be used to add to an investigation. You could say it's his job and he could do better, and of course he could, but this is a turd he's polishing. He has to be vague or the retardation shows. Ms. Pierce's document automatically reads a lot better because she just has to list the facts to make her case, and there are tons of them to work with.

It really helps that imo the Detective actually put together a really good warrant application. It feels to me like there may have been several iterations and discussions with people like the judge and prosecution before finalizing it, also evident from the judge being able to sign it immediately (well, after 4 minutes). Maybe it's because they knew the target was a wealthy belligerent retard who would definitely try to get it thrown out.

 

[Crispy Jakes]

Ahh Rekieta you're fucked buddy.

All according to keikaku

 

[Useful_Mistake]

It's probably just privated anyways. Google can likely make it reappear either way with a court order.

It is privated.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

Hopefully, the prosecution decides to no longer be gentle with him, and starts beating him with books.

I had assumed that in the end Nick was just going to end up getting a slap on the wrist but now I'm pretty sure that niggas going to prison

He has not only been defiant in co-operating with the state on testing and getting his kids back, he has insulted them every step of the way, mocked them, and been generally sleazy about it.
The best part is he has now wasted their time by not working on any plea deals.
I suspect at this point he is fucked. There's always a chance they may offer one last plea deal at juror selection.
But Nick knows best! He'll have his lawyer hand pick the finest people who will truly believe him and fight this to the end.

We've long described Nick's ability to argue a traffic offense up to the Death Penalty. This is that in action.

God is it ever.

He is saying that Nick hid his video so the fact it's in evidence is a Brady violation as the cop would have needed a search warrant or whatever to get it and it wasn't presented in discovery. He just worded it so badly and didn't actually ask for an explanation so nobody knew wtf he meant.

This is the dumbest defense imaginable the Lawyer probably had a minor aneurism writing, it which is why it reads so poorly. His brain was fighting the case of "My client put a video up on a public website anyone can watch things on, so you using that after it went private is illegal."
Wimp Lo Kung Pow logic. "I am bleeding, therefore I am the victor."

E:
This was a well put response by the state. The only thing I don't fully know about is the firearms. But if they were out in the open by drugs? Open and shut confiscate.
If they were locked up in a safe?
Different story. Sounds like to me they were out in the open, which is extra fucked.