Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

View attachment 6369553

J.K. Rowling is a multi-millionairess. A household name and one of the wealthiest women in the world.

And you think she rents?
They really can't understand how much money she has.
They are living in a fantasy world where they can only imagine using doordash every day, not realising she can buy whole restaurants if she wish. They simply cannot fathom what being well to do means, or what being really fuck you rich like JK means in the daily life.
 
View attachment 6367960

They're really running with this mold shit, aren't they?
"her kids aren't spending much time with her anymore". Almost as insane as the mould theory and they keep claiming this. Where did they get this and why should it be true? First of all, they are not little kids anymore (the youngest is 19), so what does "spending much time" even mean? Grown children have their own lives. Secondly, they just want it to be true because they love cutting off "unsupportive" family or leaving their wives and kids for their fetish. Maybe they are mad because unlike most other celebrities, she has always kept her kids out of the spotlight.
 
Alright, alright, I know I shouldn't, but there was such a rich vein of autism in the comments, I couldn't resist getting out my Minecraft pickaxe and starting to dig...

fascists are miserable.png


This message brought to you by the famously very happy trans community.

troons and fantasy.png


Yeah, troons are really good at pretending.

bodyshaming is horrific.png


Meanwhile, Aryasvitkona is out here every day brutally owning the likes of J.K. Rowling, Andrew Tate and Donald Trump, who 100% both totally know who they are and are very, very bothered and upset by what they think of them. Aryasvitkona knows that body shaming is horrific (lol, confirmed for fatty), but doesn't care, just like when they make jokes about J.K. and her obvious mold problem, because it so bothers Donald Trump and Andrew Tate when they make comments like that, and they're a bit of a fucking maverick when it comes to things like that.

If you can't roll with the big dogs, get off the fucking porch, capiche?

trans woman lovers.png

Ah yes, here we see the typical troon "Cis bitches jus' mad, 'cause we can steal they man" cope. Even before we get into the fact that it is well-documented that J.K.'s ex was a violent, abusive bully who literally left her to die alone in the street, the sort of men that would fuck a tranny - literal bottom-feeders - are not the sort of men any woman would be going, "Oh, woe is me!" over losing.

what if.png

This one highlights an unlikely, but interesting thought experiment, at least - what if J.K. Rowling actually came out as trans?

I say interesting, because everything about ThePupYT's response seems to imply that they probably wouldn't forgive her even then, which cements my theory that there is literally nothing J.K. Rowling could do to to appease these fucking lunatics.

Screenshot 2024-09-01 09.35.55.png

You're a fucking aspergillus. The lot of you are aspergillus. Riddled with it, you are.
 
Last edited:
I absolutely love how their description of fascist belief systems is an exact image of how trans activism and trans rhetoric work. They prey on people who are anxious, afraid, self-doubting, and uncomfortable with themselves, tell them they can be/feel fulfilled through this One Neat Trick of sterilizing themselves and destroying their health forever, and none of it comes anywhere close to addressing the actual issues they had in the first place. Add in the extremely strict hierarchical structure of the trans community, their habit of excommunicating and viciously attacking anyone who leaves the cult, and the horrific, violent, threatening, harassing and sexually harassing way they treat anyone who disagrees with their dogma, and... well... it sounds like they're in a fascist system.

Then again, trannies always have been the kings queens of projection.
 
They really can't understand how much money she has.
They are living in a fantasy world where they can only imagine using doordash every day, not realising she can buy whole restaurants if she wish. They simply cannot fathom what being well to do means, or what being really fuck you rich like JK means in the daily life.
For those that don't understand the feeling of "fuck you" money, imagine spending $10,000 dollars on a frivolous purchase. This is something you'd likely think about over and over, probably go over it with the family if you have one, and when you finally hit "buy", you feel this massive twinge of guilt about whether this money could have gone to something better, and this feeling never goes away. Most people wouldn't even bother thinking of spending that much money on a non-essential because the very thought burns a hole in their wallets and in their hearts. Rowling can sit on the toilet, whip out her phone, buy something for $100,000, put her phone back, wash her hands, leave the bathroom and will never lose sleep about where that money went. That is "fuck you" money.
 
As I understand she owns some kind of historic castle but she lives in an Edinburgh mansion.

But yes, of all the things for troons to attack anyone on, the state of your room is shall we say a bold choice.

She lives in a reasonably large but not excessive detached house in one of the better suburbs of Edinburgh (Barnton). Not a mansion by any means.
 
She lives in a reasonably large but not excessive detached house in one of the better suburbs of Edinburgh (Barnton). Not a mansion by any means.
When people talk about the mansion, they usually mean the house she sold (I think) at the start of this year, which has eight bedrooms and a garden larger than half my street. If her current house is even remotely similar, then by the standards of a typical British house, it's a mansion.

Ok, my facts are all wrong I think. Latest info I can find is that she lives in the White House in barnton, a 17th century mansion with huge grounds and a leylandii hedge. The other mansion (the eight bedroom one) was on the market in 2012.

Either way, they're not "reasonably large" by UK standards. They're enormous. They're large even by American standards.
 
Last edited:
fanofslavery.png
My controversial take is that Harry Potter is just kind of okay. I liked it as a kid but have no real desire to revisit it as an adult.
So many trans women talk about having had 'a Nazi phase' when they were younger, to the point that it's like a relatable meme in trans circles. Like they haven't just exchanged one extreme, autocratic belief system that preys on weak people's vulnerabilities for another.
Eliza Mondegreen's conclusion on this was that they go from being Nazi's to being trans because they want to be part of a hate movement, but don't want to be unpopular. There's a high social price to pay for being a public facing Neo-Nazi, but you can sling around the same sort of rhetoric under the guise of trans rights and be publicly celebrated for it.
 
Rowling going deranged from some rare form of mansion fungus is easier to comprehend for these troons than the possibility of her genuinely giving a single shit about women’s rights. It really shows their true colors.

Due to their lack of hygiene and lack of care of their own living quarters, isn't that sort of thing more likely to befall the troons than JK Rowling?
 
My controversial take is that Harry Potter is just kind of okay. I liked it as a kid but have no real desire to revisit it as an adult.
I don't think that's a very controversial take. It's a book series for children. That's the target audience.

My controversial take is that it's a shame that this thing didn't happen this year, because it's a nice thing, for children, who are going back to school very soon, and helps make the world feel like a more magical place.

Let's not forget, most of this shit is sour grapes from these fucking people. They dreamed of getting their letter from Hogwarts, their heart soared a little bit every time they saw an owl, they spent their formative years obsessing over this world, because it's immersive and fun and very easy to self-insert into if you're a child, and now they're bitter, perverted, abusive adults who want to take the magic away from innocent little children, just like the creepy groomers they are. "Oh, they're so mid and mean-spirited and they condone slavery and blah, blah, blah..." all because J.K. Rowling said men can't be women and it made their lady-boners droop.

Also, this is off-topic and just a personal thing, from my new playthrough of Hogwarts Legacy, but I have decided I hate this bitch.

1725281974674.png

"Hello dere, friend. Do yoo remembah how Ah beat yoo in de Accio minigame? Oh ho ho, yes indeed, dat was a very good game dat Ah beat yoo in. Ah am from Uganda, and over dere, de wizahds do naht use wahnds hardly at ahll, dey do it ahll by waggling dere big BBCs around. In Uganda, our magic school, Wagamamadaggadoodlefroobledydoo is SO much biggah and more eempressif than Hogwahrts!"

Why don't you fuck off back there then, bitch? Don't they burn little shits like you alive over there?

Folks, I am calling for Total Natty Death. It is non-negotiable, at this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those that don't understand the feeling of "fuck you" money, imagine spending $10,000 dollars on a frivolous purchase. This is something you'd likely think about over and over, probably go over it with the family if you have one, and when you finally hit "buy", you feel this massive twinge of guilt about whether this money could have gone to something better, and this feeling never goes away. Most people wouldn't even bother thinking of spending that much money on a non-essential because the very thought burns a hole in their wallets and in their hearts. Rowling can sit on the toilet, whip out her phone, buy something for $100,000, put her phone back, wash her hands, leave the bathroom and will never lose sleep about where that money went. That is "fuck you" money.
By the time she's washed her hands she's probably made that 10K again on royalties/interest/investment appreciation/etc. The only reason she isn't a billionaire is because of charitable donations and if she stopped giving as much to charities she'd be a billionaire again quite quickly. She also doesn't seem to do much to avoid paying tax as she's one of the biggest tax payers in the UK. One of the most recent valuations of her fortune put her at having £945 million, which actually comfortably makes her a USD billionaire.
 
View attachment 6373099
My controversial take is that Harry Potter is just kind of okay. I liked it as a kid but have no real desire to revisit it as an adult.

Eliza Mondegreen's conclusion on this was that they go from being Nazi's to being trans because they want to be part of a hate movement, but don't want to be unpopular. There's a high social price to pay for being a public facing Neo-Nazi, but you can sling around the same sort of rhetoric under the guise of trans rights and be publicly celebrated for it.
They're so salty and mean spirited, how dare people (kids) enjoy Harry Potter. This is a "back to school" event, so it's most certainly for families, but that concept is lost on trannies. The event still happened in other cities, btw.
 
Back