What does an apple taste like? To you, it tastes like an apple, to me, it tastes like an apple, but what does your apple taste like to me? Describe the taste of an apple using words, without also comparing it to other tastes. "it tastes sweet, like chicken, cold or wet". All of those are subjective tastes.
"Very cool", you may think. "This shit was talked about when I was six, who the hell cares", you may ponder.
Well, consider this: Taste is one of the five senses and just like the other senses; touch, sound, smell and sight, their parameters are unique to the individual who is experiencing those sensations. In the extreme then, there are three realities; What you think an apple tastes like, what I think an apple tastes like and what the apple, in it's pure mathematical, universal code, actually tastes like.
What if then, we knew where in the brain these subjective parameters of senses occurred and, using linguistics, psychology and social programming, we could make any subject, no matter how universally agreed upon it once was, 'taste' different to the individual? Well, we could create realities that nobody could agree upon, by design.
How would this benefit? Simply in keeping the world divided and therefore conquered. Remember the blue/gold dress meme from years ago? A psy-op and a test to see if 'they' had accurately split reality using senses, in this case, sight. Do you see a blue dress? I don't, I see gold, therefore, you must be fucking mental because even a moron can see it's gold. Do you vote dem/tory/nazi/monster-raving-looney-party? Then you must be fucking mental because everyone knows voting for Kony is the only sensible vote, therefore you are wrong and different and cannot perceive reality.
With the rise of the internet, the smartphone and the conditioning that comes with both, the taste of politics, games and media has diverged so much that even simple statements like 2+2=4 and a woman is a human female, are like comparing tasty apples to repugnant oranges.
---
Double-posting to separate the tinfoil crazy.
David Icke used the 'lizard people' theory as a way to shield himself from litigation, or worse, assassination. 99% of what Icke has talked about in the past and continues to discuss to this today is absolutely on point. Yet, when the normies or media rags mention him, they do so in the same sentence as calling him a crackpot for his lizard theory. Therefore, he can continue talking freely and openly, knowing that the masses will never believe what he says and he stays out of the (rifle) sights of the glowies.
On the flip side, Alex Jones' biggest mistake is being known as the crazy guy who is also right. He can be right and still crazy, he can be crazy and still right. He has no separation and no shield like Icke, which is why he was sued into oblivion over the Sandy Hook theory.
Jones can be sued because he's crazy and right, where as Icke couldn't/wouldn't be sued because "lol, that dude thinks the queen is a lizard, anything he says is nuts".