Argue with Dr. Butt over ethics of revenge pornography, 4th dimensional molestation, and how pedophila is created

[Dr. Butt]

How is the bond for cocaine and guns lower than the non-concencual distribution of a nude?

It should be. Sex crimes will always be worse than drug running or "REEE gun and ammo weren't in separate locked boxes". They're also worse than feeding a child poor nutrition (which is what a kid getting into the drugs once is).

Publicly posting naked photos of a woman without her consent is a gateway molestation that indicates much deeper issues. Revenge porn is pedo-adjacent, just like AGP is serial killer-adjacent. (And I don't care if he claims to have only sent it to one person, that's still public if the woman didn't send it to both of them herself. I personally think people shouldn't be sending naked selfies to a male if they don't want them definitely shown to the entire world, but the fact that any man who requests cellphone nudes is a perv is not relevant to the question of whether revenge porn should be punished more harshly than owning a gun).

 

[Swole McPole]

REKIETA WANTS AARON JAILED FOR BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE POLYCULE!

"...in my opinion, he's gone well beyond the level of harassment. If everybody's noticed, I've only recently started saying ANYTHING, but we have been exceptionally quiet, intentionally so, none of, uh, none of, you know, our lives were geared to be out in the public like this, and um, having this one person routinely say false things over and over and over, and vindictively and viciously do it...."

Is this like when you have an enormous audience and you repeatedly, vindictively and viciously call somebody a paedophile who likes to suck little boy's dicks?

Presumably Rekieta has now seen the error of his ways and will be cutting Montegraph a cheque for a substantial sum of money to settle the defamation case?

Publicly posting naked photos of a woman without her consent is a gateway molestation that indicates much deeper issues. Revenge porn is pedo-adjacent, just like AGP is serial killer-adjacent.

When you're talking about a teenage girl who has shared nude images with her first boyfriend who has then distributed them around the schoolyard/internet I'd wholeheartedly agree with you.

When you're talking about a forty-something married mother of four kids who holidays in the swinger resort of Hedonism II, and posts naked pics of her and her swinger hubby to a locals group where the membership are regularly posting pics of their titties and ass, I'm not sure that the bar deserves to be quite so high. Particularly when the image we're talking about is something that she voluntarily sent to her married lover while in the process of committing adultery.

If there's any pedo adjacency going on there, all participants would be guilty of it. But I think the wife and mother of five kids who's sending out her titty pics to another woman's husband is deserving of at least as much condemnation as the man who shows the picture of her saggy old baps to his middle aged chum.

 

[AnOminous]

Is this like when you have an enormous audience and you repeatedly, vindictively and viciously call somebody a paedophile who likes to suck little boy's dicks?

Presumably Rekieta has now seen the error of his ways and will be cutting Montegraph a cheque for a substantial sum of money to settle the defamation case?

I like how Balldo is now so utterly brain-damaged he no longer even knows the legal definition of harassment and is just shrieking "muh horsemint" despite nothing he's whining about meeting even a single element of the offense.

I know Balldo is a dumb narcissistic faggot who thinks it's somehow illegal to talk about what an evil fuck he is, but he doesn't have any actual laws on his side.

 

[Dr. Butt]

If there's any pedo adjacency going on there, all participants would be guilty of it. But I think the wife and mother of five kids who's sending out her titty pics to another woman's husband is deserving of at least as much condemnation as the man who shows the picture of her saggy old baps to his middle aged chum.

I'm saying the pathology of sharing the naked picture without permission is in the same category as a pedo or troon.

When you're talking about a teenage girl who has shared nude images with her first boyfriend who has then distributed them around the schoolyard/internet I'd wholeheartedly agree with you.

Only if it was her first boyfriend? Bit weird to put so many moral qualifiers on the woman. Like that judge who said abortion in the case of rape was only acceptabel for an "underage girl who was violently raped and was a virgin saving herself for marriage".

The problem is men who share naked photos, hurt animals, jack off in lingerie, or hide in a friend's closet for 12 hours to "prank" her when she gets home, are indicating a deeper, much more dangerous problem than the naked picture sharing in and of itself.

 

[Mark Robinson BussyLiquor]

It is disrespectful to the Xourt not to let your freak flag fly. Nick, be yourself. Wear the balldo for the Xudge.

I'm saying the pathology of sharing the naked picture without permission is in the same category as a pedo or troon.

Only if it was her first boyfriend? Bit weird to put so many moral qualifiers on the woman. Like that judge who said abortion in the case of rape was only acceptabel for an "underage girl who was violently raped and was a virgin saving herself for marriage".

The problem is men who share naked photos, hurt animals, jack off in lingerie, or hide in a friend's closet for 12 hours to "prank" her when she gets home, are indicating a deeper, much more dangerous problem than the naked picture sharing in and of itself.

No, you're demented. A couple guys sniggering over a photo that some woman was stupid enough to send one of them are not in the same category as the other degenerate shit you mentioned.

If whores didn't send nudes, then they wouldn't have to worry about "revenge porn," now would they? Maybe they deserve it for being sluts? Did that occur to you?

 

[Dr. Butt]

Maybe they deserve it for being sluts?

The only thing a "slut" deserves is a fine or misdemeanor charge if she lives in an area where slutting is illegal. Why are you seething so hard over a woman you don't want to fuck in the first place?

 

[Mark Robinson BussyLiquor]

The only thing a "slut" deserves is a fine or misdemeanor charge if she lives in an area where slutting is illegal. Why are you seething so hard over a woman you don't want to fuck in the first place?

1) Don't assume who I would or would not fuck.

2) Don't assume the only reason men seethe is due to sex.

3) Slutting is a crime against God, so it's illegal everywhere.

 

[ChromaQuack]

The only thing a "slut" deserves is a fine or misdemeanor charge if she lives in an area where slutting is illegal. Why are you seething so hard over a woman you don't want to fuck in the first place?

Ascribing morality in totality to what the state says is fucking retarded, as are your non-sequitur scenarios that never happened, please kindly fuck off and come back when whatever you drank or ingested wears off.

Kayla's fantasy was a phaser attack.

Nah, we all know she watches the show for the quality romance in it, just look at these two.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

I'm saying the pathology of sharing the naked picture without permission is in the same category as a pedo or troon.

It's not a pathology. Pathologies aren't cured with permission. No amount of permission makes pedophilia okay.

 

[Swole McPole]

Only if it was her first boyfriend? Bit weird to put so many moral qualifiers on the woman. Like that judge who said abortion in the case of rape was only acceptabel for an "underage girl who was violently raped and was a virgin saving herself for marriage".

Are you being deliberately obtuse? I'm saying there's a qualitative difference between a naive 16 year old and a forty something swinger with twenty years of marriage and five kids behind her sending her nudes to ANOTHER married man.

While they should obviously both have the same expectations of privacy, the relative quantum of harm and the amount of contributory culpability these two women bear is significantly different. If you can't see that, I don't know what to tell you.

 

[Dr. Butt]

It's not a pathology. Pathologies aren't cured with permission. No amount of permission makes pedophilia okay.

Just because adult women are able to give consent, doesn't mean that it isn't fucked up to violate the boundaries of an adult woman who did not give you consent.

 

[not william stenchever]

Just because adult women are able to give consent, doesn't mean that it isn't fucked up to violate the boundaries of an adult woman who did not give you consent.

Counterpoint: Kayla is a retarded whore who has failed her children as a mother in innumerable ways to the point that she would be a good advertisement for Sharia law.

 

[Dr. Butt]

Counterpoint: Kayla is a retarded whore who has failed her children as a mother in innumerable ways to the point that she would be a good advertisement for Sharia law.

Like said, if she's so gross and you'd never fuck her, why are you seething so hard that she whored around for some other guys? Just calm down. You could be a big slut too, but you'd have to waste money on beer and drugs and listen to hipster women talk about stupid shit that doesn't matter. You don't need to be so angry at some "easy mode for women" that isn't even real.

The bond for rapey behaviour is higher than it is for improper gun storage & getting high. That sounds very fair to me.

 

[Swole McPole]

Like said, if she's so gross and you'd never fuck her, why are you seething so hard that she whored around for some other guys? Just calm down.

No matter how hard you white knight on her behalf, you're always going to be standing behind fapcop in the line for the gangbang.

 

[Strix454]

The bond for rapey behaviour is higher than it is for improper gun storage & getting high. That sounds very fair to me.

You really crossed the line there. Your flat-out saying now that your precious Kayla was raped and that Nick did nothing wrong. Revenge porn can be wrong. But its not rape in any sense of the word. And I don't understand how any of this makes Nick into a hero for you.

 

[Henri Barbusse]

Counterpoint: Kayla is a retarded whore who has failed her children as a mother in innumerable ways to the point that she would be a good advertisement for Sharia law.

There is no Kayla anymore. There is only Nick and pills fighting for control over a ruined body.

 

[Dr. Butt]

You really crossed the line there. Your flat-out saying now that your precious Kayla was raped and that Nick did nothing wrong. Revenge porn can be wrong. But its not rape in any sense of the word. And I don't understand how any of this makes Nick into a hero for you.

I don't understand when I said Nick is a hero. You must be about five years old to think that agreeing with the price of bail/bond for Aaron = exonerating Balldo. I think violating the boundaries of women is worse than doing drugs and leaving your gun on the floor or wherever. I did not call revenge porn "rape", I referred to the boundary-violoting as "rapey behaviour". Naked photo sharing is in the same category as troons desperate to piss in the women's toilets. Agreeing that bond for being a creepo should be high, is not the same as thinking Rekieta should go free. All these people are fuckups, but it's still bad for society to be nonconsensually sharing gash photos of said fuckups.

 

[Strix454]

I don't understand when I said Nick is a hero. You must be about five years old to think that agreeing with the price of bail/bond for Aaron = exonerating Balldo. I think violating the boundaries of women is worse than doing drugs and leaving your gun on the floor or wherever. I did not call revenge porn "rape", I referred to the boundary-violoting as "rapey behaviour". Naked photo sharing is in the same category as troons desperate to piss in the women's toilets. Agreeing that bond for being a creepo should be high, is not the same as thinking Rekieta should go free. All these people are fuckups, but it's still bad for society to be nonconsensually sharing gash p

Yeah. You are simping for Kayla, you went out of your way to say Nick's crimes are not really crimes and now you double down on it. Then you reach into your bag of feminist cliches like "boundary violating", "boundaries of women" and use a word like "rapey" to imply that revenge porn is the same as rape because you are clearly trying to lessen Nick's crimes and promote Kayla as a victim.

You further go on to explain that a troon pissing a woman's toilet is somehow also raping woman. WORDS MEAN THINGS. Don't come around here peddling your progressive bullshit about how male gaze, toilet use and just about anything other than physical sexual assault is rape. Its not.

You can try to weasel-word hide your agenda. You can try to build a troon shield around your weird defense of Nick, your simping for Kayla and your belief in non-physical forms of rape. But none of it is convincing. You had a reasonable argument up to a certain point. But when you dropped the rape bomb and started defending Nick rather than advocating against revenge porn, you crossed the line.

And yeah. You live in a society.

 

[keke]

Yeah. You are simping for Kayla, you went out of your way to say Nick's crimes are not really crimes and now you double down on it. Then you reach into your bag of feminist cliches like "boundary violating", "boundaries of women" and use a word like "rapey" to imply that revenge porn is the same as rape because you are clearly trying to lessen Nick's crimes and promote Kayla as a victim.

You further go on to explain that a troon pissing a woman's toilet is somehow also raping woman. WORDS MEAN THINGS. Don't come around here peddling your progressive bullshit about how male gaze, toilet use and just about anything other than physical sexual assault is rape. Its not.

You can try to weasel-word hide your agenda. You can try to build a troon shield around your weird defense of Nick, your simping for Kayla and your belief in non-physical forms of rape. But none of it is convincing. You had a reasonable argument up to a certain point. But when you dropped the rape bomb and started defending Nick rather than advocating against revenge porn, you crossed the line.

And yeah. You live in a society.

Troons and sexual predators alike get sexually thrilled by crossing women’s boundaries. That’s why flashers do what they do. It’s not feminist critique, it’s a criminal pattern of behaviour that is well-documented and part of criminal analysis for decades. Someone who hears no and does it anyway is what investigators build profiles around.

Revenge porn is a sex crime. Rape is a sex crime. I’m pretty sure that’s all Dr Butt was trying to say and worded it like shit, and you’re sperging hard for no reason. He said something was rapey and you’re saying he said it’s rape, who’s actually “try to weasel-word [sic] to hide your agenda”? Have you never heard the word rapey before? Brother is looping

Don't come around here

GAY

 

[Captain Manning]

This "Dabbleverse" shit is fucking gay.

Bunch of faggots who want to relive the long stale days of edgy AM shock jock radio.

I wish somebody would take a flamethrower to all of it.

I don't understand when I said Nick is a hero. You must be about five years old to think that agreeing with the price of bail/bond for Aaron = exonerating Balldo. I think violating the boundaries of women is worse than doing drugs and leaving your gun on the floor or wherever.

There is no way you can convince me that Aaron's charges deserve higher bail than Nick's far more serious charges. The theoretical max sentence for Nick's crimes is way higher. 26 grams of coke around children and firearms is no laughing matter.

And that's even before you get into the fact I have precious little sympathy for Kayla, and have trouble keeping a straight face while referring to her as a "victim" here.

The only reason I'm not making hay over this is I think @TherapyMan is right that they might have factored in Aaron's priors in calculating that bail. It's possible that Aaron's higher bail is defensible on that basis.

Make no mistake, if Aaron and Nick both had no priors, and Aaron got the higher bail, I'd be raising a lot more hell here.