- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
The nukes were completely justified, in fact we did not use enough.they deserve a third bomb for that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The nukes were completely justified, in fact we did not use enough.they deserve a third bomb for that
Oh you don’t know the half in of it buddy….Its fuckin worse than you think….There is a lolicon magazine...
View attachment 6380879
"Puberty is literally when women are in their prime"- a pedophile.A while ago I posted about this burner Facebook account, where a Lolicon straight up admits to being attracted to minors:
View attachment 6381587
View attachment 6381588
View attachment 6381589View attachment 6381590View attachment 6381595View attachment 6381597View attachment 6381598View attachment 6381599
Some may say that Punished Theo is just “shitposting”. However, I'm not buying that. If someone says point blank that they are a pedophile and love CP, its safe to assume that they likely do have CP on their hard drives at minimum.
Why can't more admit it like this and make it easy for us...A while ago I posted about this burner Facebook account, where a Lolicon straight up admits to being attracted to minors:
The wood chipper is far too generous."Puberty is literally when women are in their prime"- a pedophile.
We are at if she bleeds she breeds territory. Oh I can smell this creature. I can smell the cum jars. This nigga has shilled out for a 20tb hard drive. And its full. Oh lord. You have to go back. Back to the woodchipper.
To be fair Subahibi has a multiple loli scenes, so it's kinda to be expected there.Anyways my two cents are that lolifags are weird and obnoxious.
I think someone brought this up before, but Japan was (before 1999) one of the worst countries in the world in terms of CSAM distribution. The only reason CSAM was banned is because other governments basically forced them to outlaw it:Reminder that the term lolicon refers to actual young girls back in the day AND drawings. And this was allowed to be printed and published.
Of course I'm not making that sort of argument. My post was responding to defenders of lolicon who prove too much by arguing that an "anti" (anti-pedophile) should also think that GTA players are murderers (or that violent video games cause violence). When I originally wrote it, I was responding to the pedophile known as @dzonatan who said this:My advice: probably don't use Jack Thompson style arguments against lolicon. Because using the same logic as the "violent video makes people violent" to argue that loli turns people into pedos is how people against lolicon end up losing the argument, unless if you are a Jack Thompson type yourself.
You'd be far better off, arguing that loli is bad because it's immoral and degenerate or citing studies and/or data that proves there's a link between pedophilia and lolicon, and one that's stronger than correlation since I've seen lolicons pull the "correlation =/= causation" defense. If you don't want to be associated with the anti-violent game people, then you should avoid using the same logic/style as the "violent games leads to violence" argument, when arguing against the loli defenders.
Other than that, you could add the violent video game analogy to the cope section, but I'd still warn against using the same type of moralfag argument. Also I do think Jack Thompson may have actually been right about Japanese media in America being another Pearl Harbor.
dzonatan said:[GTA and lolicon] are fictional crimes.
I'm the opposite of Jack Thompson precisely because pedos bring up Jack Thompson as a strawman and argue that people disgusted with drawn CP are just being a Jack Thompson.dzonatan said:Do you call GTA players murderers too?
The theoretical end point of porn addiction where you'll jack off to anything is about the only point i can see someone jerk off to lolicon and not be a pedophile, but at that point, it's likely they are a pedophile because nothing but the most depraved vile shit like CSAM will get them off any more. That's the only correlation =/= causation argument i can think of.Jerking off to lolicon doesn't cause you to be a pedophile, being a pedophile in the first place is what causes you to jerk off to lolicon. There's a strong correlation between enjoyment of lolicon and pedophilia. Anybody who has even a modicum of pattern recognition will see this too. You can argue correlation =/= causation but it's extremely unlikely that anybody could be jerking off to lolicon for non-pedophilic reasons.
iirc porn addiction rarely ends in pedophilia. More commonly they have a higher threshold for disgust regarding sex to begin with, so they don't find the thought of being aroused to children so unappealing as normal people do.The theoretical end point of porn addiction where you'll jack off to anything is about the only point i can see someone jerk off to lolicon and not be a pedophile, but at that point, it's likely they are a pedophile because nothing but the most depraved vile shit like CSAM will get them off any more. That's the only correlation =/= causation argument i can think of.
Relevant.Crazy this hasn't been posted yet
View attachment 6381446
And how deepl translates it (inb4 muh google)
View attachment 6381455
When you say "higher threshold" do you mean to say more stringent or more loose?More commonly they have a higher threshold for disgust regarding sex to begin with, so they don't find the thought of being aroused to children so unappealing as normal people do.
Both platforms take user feedback into consideration for translations. Anyone can submit translations with no background in languages and DeepL picks the most popular.Crazy this hasn't been posted yet
View attachment 6381446
And how deepl translates it (inb4 muh google)
View attachment 6381455
I guess they haven't asked rapists if they have watched lolicon with a multiple choice worksheet. Its not like there's FBI statistics or anything out there from all their stings.View attachment 6385113
What they mean to say is that there are no studies that investigate whether looking at drawn child porn leads to real rape. Not that there are any.